By using this site, you consent to the use of cookies. This site uses cookies to provide enhanced functionality and to analyse how visitors use the site, but it does not identify individual users.
DCLG issues regulations on reconsidering Sustainable Community proposals
Monday, 18 June 2012 16:49
The Government has introduced new regulations that will allow previously dismissed proposals under the Sustainable Communities Act to be reconsidered.
The Government has also launched a consultation on whether parish and town councils should be given the power to make submissions under the legislation.
The Act allows people to submit proposals – through their local authority – to the Government asking it to remove barriers, such as planning regulations or bye-laws.
Under the new regulations, a third party ‘selector’ will be able to ask the Government to review its decision. The Department for Communities and Local Government said this would mean the Government would have to fully justify its reasons for rejecting the original proposal.
The Government will also have to consult and try and reach an agreement with the ‘selector’ before a decision is made on implementation of the proposal.
The identity of the selector is to be announced in due course. The regulations will come into force on 26 July 2012.
The DCLG insisted that the regime would be “light touch”.
Decentralisation Minister Greg Clark said: "Local people often have great ideas for their areas and are keen to improve their neighbourhoods yet are met with a plethora of rules and regulations that do nothing but stand in their way.
"Ensuring people can challenge these rules will make the Government much more accountable for the rules it implements. Government's role should always be to support local people, not stop them.
"These new regulations help enforce that notion and put the power where it belongs, at the local level. They will help replace the implicit 'no' to improvement in our cities, towns and villages with an explicit 'yes'."
The use of pseudonyms is permitted. Supplying an email address is optional and will not be published or used for any purpose other than notifying you of new comments on this article (if requested below).
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case over whether a recreation ground provided by a local authority in exercise of its statutory powers for local people to take part in lawful sports and pastimes can be… Read more
Campaigners have launched a judicial review challenge to the first scheme to be promoted by a local authority under the infrastructure planning and consenting regime contained in the Planning Act 2008. Read more
A recent High Court judgment considered the sometime murky question of whether ministerial statements amount to material considerations in the determination of planning decisions. Suzan Yildiz and Adam Baker consider the relevant practice points… Read more
David Brock analyses a recent High Court judgment that found a purported s. 106 agreement was invalid, and calls on the DCLG to address the problems the case raised. Read more
How does planning law fit with the rights of the family and of the child under international law? David Hart QC analyses a recent High Court ruling. Read more
The latest View from the President’s Chamber from the head of the family justice system, Sir James Munby, is simply a must-read for all those involved in or with responsibility for the running of childcare legal teams. It also has significant resourcing implications.
This entry reports on the revocation of the last three regional strategies, nearly three years after the government first attempted to get rid of them.
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.