Of special interest PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 27 June 2012 00:00

Standards iStock 000000830416XSmall 146 x 219Publication of the regulations governing disclosable pecuniary interests has completed the standards regime jigsaw. Olwen Dutton and Peter Keith-Lucas examine the detail and assess what it means for authorities.

The Department for Communities and Local Government has at last published the last pieces of the standards jigsaw – the regulations which define Disclosable Pecuniary Interests along with the Commencement Order that sets out the transitional arrangements for the change over to the new standards regime under the Localism Act 2011.

The new regime comes into force in the next few days so local authorities need to set up the new arrangements as soon as possible, and members, Monitoring Officers and all officers who deal with members in their jobs will have to be trained on the new provisions.


These regulations are extremely belated. The Localism Act 2011 received Royal Assent on 15 November 2011 and at the time Grant Shapps stated that the new regime was to be in place by 1 April 2012. That deadline passed; DCLG then announced that the new regime was to be in place by 1 July 2012.

By taking seven months to publish the regulations, DCLG now requires every authority to arrange an extraordinary meeting at short notice to adopt its Code of Conduct and Arrangements for dealing with conduct complaints. Allowing five clear days to get the agenda and reports out before the meeting gives no opportunity for sensible discussion over what should go into such Code and Arrangements, and no time for member training before those members are subject to criminal sanctions under the new regime.

Disclosable Pecuniary Interests

The definitions of Personal and Prejudicial Interests under the Model Code are replaced by a new definition of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (DPIs) under the Relevant Authorities (Disclosable Pecuniary Interests) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1464), which apply to all local authorities in England and to police authorities in Wales.

Where a member has a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest, it is a criminal offence to fail to register that interest, to fail to disclose it at a meeting unless it is already registered, or to participate on a relevant item of business, unless the member has a dispensation from the authority, or to take any action on the matter as a member of the Executive, other than to refer the matter to another executive member for determination.

The definition of a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest is significantly different from the former Prejudicial Interest definition: 

  • It applies to interests of the member and their spouse or partner. This means that for registration, it is wider than the old requirements which applied only to interests of the member him/herself. But for disclosure and non-participation purposes it is significantly narrower than the old definition, as it omits reference to the member’s family or friends. 
  • It is broader than the old definition of a prejudicial interest, in that it is a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest even if there is no likelihood that it might prejudice the member’s perception of the public interest. The Government has clearly taken the view that this element of the old Prejudicial Interest test would not stand up to scrutiny in the criminal courts, but it means that a decision which has only a minimal impact on a member’s property or employer can trigger a criminal offence.
  • It is also narrower in that it applies only to very defined categories of interest and omits reference to matters likely to affect the wellbeing or financial standing of the member, or his/her family or friends. Whilst councils may wish to adopt local Codes which require councillors at least to disclose where a decision would affect or relate to family or friends, the removal of the power of suspension puts in doubt the ability of a Code to require that a member withdraw from consideration of a matter which directly affects family or friends.

The seven specific categories of Disclosable Pecuniary Interest also show significant changes from the old Model Code of Conduct. Bevan Brittan LLP will be publishing a line-by-line comparison, but at this stage we would point out that there are real difficulties with some of the definitions in the Regulations: 

  • the “Employment” category applies only to employment or a business carried on for profit or gain, so excluding unpaid work for public, voluntary and charitable bodies (unless Special Responsibility Allowances constitute profit or gain). 
  • the “Contracts” category only applies to contracts between the authority and either the member or a body in which he has a beneficial interest; however, the definition of “beneficial interest” includes directors, but omits employment on terms where the member would get a direct benefit such as a performance bonus from the existence of the contract.
  • the “Contracts” category also appears to apply only once the contract has been entered, so that the member has no bar on participation during the procurement phase for the contract. 
  • Gifts and Hospitality have been omitted from the regulations. So, if authorities wish to maintain a register of gifts and hospitality or provide advice to members on when to accept or decline gifts or hospitality, or when such a gift or hospitality might give the impression of bias, no statutory sanctions will be available for breach.

Transition to the new regime

The Localism Act 2011 (Commencement No. 6 and Transitional, Savings and Transitory Provisions) Order 2012 (SI2012/1463) (the Order) disapplies the old standards regime as from 1 July 2012, other than for resolving outstanding complaints, and brings the new regime into force from the same day. The Order also partially commences certain provisions from 7 June so as to enable authorities to do the necessary preparatory work.

Every authority must have adopted a Code and Arrangements for handling member conduct complaints through Council by 1 July 2012.

In addition, the Order sets out the transitional arrangements for the changeover to the new standards regime under the Localism Act 2011. Two categories of outstanding complaints under the old Code survive – complaints which have been investigated by Standards for England and have already been referred to the First Tier Tribunal for determination, and complaints which by 1 July 2012 have been investigated by or on behalf of the Monitoring Officer and referred to the Council’s Standards Committee (which are now to be dealt with under the Council’s new Arrangements, without a power to impose a suspension).

The wording of the Order appears only to extend the life of complaints where the investigation has been completed and the matter referred back to the Standards Committee for determination. For all other complaints (i.e. those which for which the investigation has yet to be completed) under the Order as drafted there are simply no arrangements for them ever to be determined. Existing appeals to the First Tier Tribunal and legal proceedings in respect of determined complaints will be continued.

One unexpected new provision, not in the drafts and appearing without apparent consultation, is that a Standards Committee’s power to suspend is revoked from 7 June 2012, so that this sanction is now no longer available.  This has already caused considerable disquiet amongst authorities, given that these sanctions tend to be reserved to the more serious cases, and the change seriously weakens the sanctions that authorities can place upon members for breaches of the Code in its last few weeks.

Independent persons

Many will remember the concern that was caused by the last minute changes to the Localism Bill relating to the role of the Independent Person. For these purposes, the controversy was caused by the provision which barred existing independent members from being Independent Persons.  The regulations have now amended this by disapplying for one year the provisions in s.28(8)(b) which brought this on, as long as they are not in post on 1 July 2012, which would be difficult as the Standards Committees to which they are independent members will have ceased to be by then.

However, if councils are considering appointing their existing independent members as their new Independent Persons, there are two things to be aware of:  

  • the regulations do not disapply s 28(8)(c), which provides that independent persons cannot be appointed unless the vacancy has been advertised and brought to the attention of the public; that they would be Independent Person has submitted an applications, and that the appointment has been approved by a majority of the members of the authority.
  • the “no friends” provision in s.28(8)(a), which states that a person is not independent if they are a relative or close friend of a member, co-opted member or officer of the authority  or of a parish council.  As this is wider than before it is necessary to check this as well, otherwise they will not be eligible for appointment.

Model documents

While DCLG and LGA have both produced their own model Codes (covering only the member’s general conduct  and not the interests aspects) our view is that both these Codes are seriously flawed, lacking in clarity, very weak on confidentiality, respect and bullying, and open to political abuse now that Standards Committees no longer contain Independent Members and have an Independent Member Chairman.

On the interests aspects, the new definition of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests broadly equates to the old Prejudicial Interests, so there is no statutory provision comparable with the requirement to disclose personal interests. The model Code of Conduct which we have developed attempts to apply the DPI definitions to the member’s family and friends, and associated bodies such as employers and companies in which the member is a director, to ensure that members are still required to disclose such interests even where they do not preclude the member from participating in the decision-making process.

Bevan Brittan LLP have produced a model report to Standards Committee (and on to Council), model Arrangements and a model Code of Conduct which are all available free of charge to any local authority. If you would like a copy, please email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

DCLG has stated that it will conduct a post implementation review of the policy to abolish the Standards Board regime within the next five years, to check that the new local arrangements for local authority standards are operating as expected and that the new rules are not too onerous.

In the meantime, authorities need to adopt the new Code and Arrangements, and arrange for members (and the independent persons, whether or not they have been Independent members previously) to be trained on the new provisions - ideally of course before the new provisions start on 1 July 2012.

Olwen Dutton and Peter Keith-Lucas are partners at Bevan Brittan. 


Latest News

April 23, 2014

Minister stresses importance of overview and scrutiny in combined authorities

A government minister has written to the leaders of constituent and non-constituent councils in three recently-created combined authorities to highlight the importance of following good practice on overview and scrutiny. Read more
April 22, 2014

Pickles threatens five councils over alleged breaches of publicity code

The Communities Secretary has threatened five London councils with legal directions over alleged breaches of the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity. Read more
April 22, 2014

Justice Secretary hits out at "inappropriate" use of judicial review

Society is “too legalistic” and the legal system is being “exploited inappropriately by pressure groups with a political point to make”, the Justice Secretary has claimed. Read more
April 17, 2014

Met Police find "no credible evidence of criminality" in Tower Hamlets files

The Metropolitan Police has found “no credible evidence of criminality” within files it received about the London Borough of Tower Hamlets to provide reasonable grounds to suspect that fraud or any other offence has… Read more
April 16, 2014

ICO raps two councils after data breaches involving social services records

Two local authorities have given undertakings to the Information Commissioner’s Office after breaches of the Data Protection Act in relation to social services records. Read more
April 16, 2014

Council and Leader defeat £670k slander claim over childrens care homes

A High Court judge has dismissed a £670,000 claim for slander brought against a borough council and its leader by two companies that operate residential children’s care homes in its area. Read more
April 15, 2014

LGPS Advisory Board publishes QC opinion on tobacco investment

An administering authority for Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) funds may choose to take into account the public health implications of tobacco investment but only if the result of such consideration is the… Read more



Dialogue iStock 000009191235XSmall 146X219
April 10, 2014

Consultation – backing no horses, and the importance of interim relief

David Hart QC looks at the lessons to be learned from a recent Court of Appeal ruling that a council had failed to consult properly on the closure of a day care centre. Read more
Money iStock 000008683901XSmall 146x219
April 02, 2014

Are local authorities bound by Ombudsman recommendations?

A High Court judge recently ruled that a council's decision to pay a developer only 20% of the £250,000 recommended by the Local Government Ombudsman was lawful. Nicholas Dobson analyses the case. Read more
April 02, 2014

The Duty of Candour - and general transparency

The Department of Health has published details of the proposed statutory Duty of Candour for health and adult social care providers, as well as a new general transparency duty. Corinne Slingo, Tracey Longfield and Belinda Dix examine the key points. Read more
April 02, 2014

Local authority control of charities - what are the limits?

The ties between a local authority and a charity were the subject of a recent Charity Commission report. Rachel Tonkin looks at the issues raised and the lessons to be learned. Read more
March 26, 2014

It's a sin to tell a lie

Jon Baines looks at the data protection issues raised by councils' use of voice risk analysis when benefit claimants are on the telephone. Read more
March 20, 2014

(Probably) the first group action for damages under the Data Protection Act

In December 2013 a group legal action was settled against a London borough following breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Human Rights Act 1998. Anna Thwaites, who acted for the claimants, explains the legal basis for the claims. Read more



Knowledge Bank

May 18, 2012

Managing in a Political Environment

Author: Nicholas Dobson, Freeth Cartwright This paper outlines the changing role of the local government lawyer in the context of the legal, political and constitutional framework of local government. This paper looks at the legal powers that underpin the role of local authorities, including the…
April 19, 2012

General Power of Confidence – ‘A New Hope’?

Author: Nicholas Dobson, Freeth Cartwright The general power of competence has been designed to give councils the confidence to act, using the power as their primary tool, without needing to refer back to central government. The question is: will the new power deliver?
March 27, 2012

Predetermination and Bias - Can Careless Talk Still Cost Decisions?

Author: Nicholas Dobson, Freeth Cartwright Ministers entered government much exercised about the law surrounding predetermination. In the opinion of some, this was a conspiracy by local government lawyers to undermine the democratic process. And they were going to have none of it! The 2010…
March 15, 2012

Recent developments in freedom of information

Author: Anya Proops, 11KBW The body of jurisprudence relating to freedom of information has continued to develop apace over the last year. The exponential growth in appeals being heard by both the first-tier and upper tribunals has meant that practitioners are having to work ever harder to keep…

Older news and features

March 26, 2014

It's a sin to tell a lie

Click here for full section archive

Wilkin Chapman Goolden

Featured Jobs

Harrogate Chief Solicitor

CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here


Howell Christie Ltd


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts





Snap Judgement

Is the role of monitoring officer worth the risk?