By using this site, you consent to the use of cookies. This site uses cookies to provide enhanced functionality and to analyse how visitors use the site, but it does not identify individual users.
Planning fees set to rise in latest Government reforms
Wednesday, 04 July 2012 13:12
Councils’ planning fees are set to rise for the first time since 2008 under the latest package of measures unveiled by the Department for Communities and Local Government.
The DCLG said the fees would be uprated in line with inflation, arguing that this would reduce the burden on taxpayers, “who otherwise end up subsidising developers”. The increase is expected to be around 15%.
The Department also said that details of the approach to be taken for a review of around 6,000 pages of supporting planning guidance would be published “shortly”. This follows publication of the National Planning Policy Framework, which reduced 1,000 pages of policy to just over 50.
Planning Minister Greg Clark also confirmed that proposals on speeding up the process for determining planning appeals – including meeting its suggested 12-month deadline – would be published for consultation “later this year”.
Other measures include:
A proposal that councils whose planning decisions are consistent with an up-to-date local plan are not ordinarily liable for costs if their decision is appealed;
Changes to the operation of the Community Infrastructure Levy from the Autumn of 2012, “including ensuring that developers are not charged the levy twice, on the same development, if they amend existing planning consent”;
Extension of the funding to April 2013 to the four organisations that supply advice and support to communities at the forefront of neighbourhood planning.
Clark claimed that the Government’s reforms to the planning system were making it simpler, clearer and more accessible to people in communities.
"Following the simplification of the national planning policy in the National Planning Policy Framework, these proposed changes streamline the process of applying for planning permission,” he said.
"Our aim is to have a system that applicants and members of communities can be confident will give a reliable, swift and fair outcome."
Responding to the DCLG announcement, Cllr Clyde Loakes, Vice Chair of the LGA’s Environment and Housing Board, said: “The proposed reduction in the amount of centrally determined national planning guidance is positive. The Government listened to the LGA argument on planning fees and the proposed 15% increase will provide some important respite to town hall budgets.
“Under the current system, hard-pressed council taxpayers have been subsidising the planning fees of multi-national developers. We will continue to press for an even fairer, more transparent, localised system for planning fees which is evidence based."
Cllr Loakes also described as positive the consultation on planning use-classes, arguing that many councils had been pressing for greater local discretion.
He added: “The majority of planning applications are already processed in quick time so it is important that much greater consideration is given to proposals for a ‘planning guarantee’ before this is taken further, including all the factors that can cause delays and the consequences of externally imposed arbitrary deadlines.”
The use of pseudonyms is permitted. Supplying an email address is optional and will not be published or used for any purpose other than notifying you of new comments on this article (if requested below).
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case over whether a recreation ground provided by a local authority in exercise of its statutory powers for local people to take part in lawful sports and pastimes can be… Read more
Campaigners have launched a judicial review challenge to the first scheme to be promoted by a local authority under the infrastructure planning and consenting regime contained in the Planning Act 2008. Read more
A recent High Court judgment considered the sometime murky question of whether ministerial statements amount to material considerations in the determination of planning decisions. Suzan Yildiz and Adam Baker consider the relevant practice points… Read more
David Brock analyses a recent High Court judgment that found a purported s. 106 agreement was invalid, and calls on the DCLG to address the problems the case raised. Read more
How does planning law fit with the rights of the family and of the child under international law? David Hart QC analyses a recent High Court ruling. Read more
There has been plenty of action this week on the tenders front, most notably with the news that the London Boroughs Legal Alliance is to establish a new solicitors framework agreement from this October.
If you’re a householder, having to take legal proceedings must be a nuisance. And even more so when the issue is a nuisance at law; and a toxic one at that.
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.