Tribunal dismisses bid to get board minutes for South West One via FOI PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 10 October 2012 12:34

The First-Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) has dismissed a bid to obtain the board minutes of the high-profile South West One joint venture through a freedom of information request.

South West One is owned by IBM (75%) and three public authorities (25%) – Somerset County Council, Taunton Deane Borough Council and Avon and Somerset Police Authority.

In Orr v The Information Commissioner and Avon and Somerset Police Authority EA/2012/0077, Mr Orr requested copies of South West One board minutes held by the police authority from April 2010 to the end of March 2011. There were four sets of board minutes covered by that period.

The police authority refused the request, relying on s. 41 of the Freedom of Information Act on the basis that the minutes had been received from the joint venture in confidence. It maintained that stance following a review.

The Information Commissioner’s Office upheld that refusal, saying the requirements of s. 41 had been satisfied. The ICO also concluded that there was no evidence that the joint venture agreement between IBM and the three public authorities and the service delivery contract between the police authority and South West One were being used to circumvent FOIA improperly.

Orr appealed. His ground of appeal was initially that the ICO should have found that SW1 was a public authority to which FOIA applied. But the Tribunal said this was “wholly misconceived” and “doomed to fail”.

However, the Tribunal declined to strike out the appeal as it had not seen the information requested nor the evidence of the deputy chief executive officer of the police authority. It said it could not therefore property judge whether the information was confidential in nature or whether a powerful public interest might demand disclosure anyway.

In its ruling, the Tribunal said it was “undeniable” that the police authority received the requested information from a third party (South West One) and that it was imparted on expressly confidential terms.

The Tribunal added that the minutes, which it had read, contained references to commercial initiatives and perceived opportunities, “clearly confidential in nature, disclosure of which would have been detrimental to the commercial interests of South West One”. The minutes also recorded discussions on a range of matters affecting the running of the venture.

Orr said he would have been prepared to accept the excision of sensitive names. This approach was rejected by the Tribunal.

“Board minutes are, by their nature, confidential information,” it said. “They record disagreements and minority opinions. They should frankly describe the inner workings of the company, whenever significant issues are discussed. It is important in the shareholders’ interests, that board minutes fully reflect what has been transacted.”

The Tribunal said it was in no doubt that disclosure of the minutes would have been detrimental to South West One’s interests.

On the issue of the public interest, the Tribunal said: “We have regard, on the one hand, to what is already in the public domain and, on the other, to the undoubted importance of transparency in the operation of joint ventures, in so far as that is consistent with the proper commercial interests of the company thereby created, here SW1.

“If a joint venture company has been formed for the specific purpose of frustrating the duties of disclosure enacted in FOIA; if public funds are being needlessly squandered in a badly–managed business; if serious conflicts of interest are or may be distorting the company`s operations, then there may be a strong case for disclosing information which reveals such facts, on the ground that disclosure by the requested public authority (here ASPA) would not be actionable.”

However, the Tribunal said this was not the case here. “There is no improper attempt to hide information from a FOIA request. Whether or not the criticism of South West One`s performance is justified, whether or not improper conflicts of interest have been permitted, the minutes shed no light on such issues,” it said.

The Tribunal said it saw no legitimate public interest in disclosure of the minutes, and therefore upheld the ICO’s decision that the police authority could rely on s. 41.

The Tribunal went on to say: “It is perhaps worth observing that, whilst the use of a joint venture company may create a ‘democratic deficit’ as regards the availability of the s.41 exemption, the position is less clear, as regards s.43(2) [prejudice to commercial interests].

“If one or more public authorities decide to engage in a commercial venture, most probably but not inevitably, through a limited company of which it or they is/are shareholder(s), such a company is a public authority by virtue of s.6 of FOIA but, as such, entitled to invoke s.43(2) to protect its commercial interests in response to, for example, a request for disclosure of its minutes.

“A similar request to the public authority shareholder could likewise be met by reliance on s.43(2). So when commercial interests are at stake, the elector`s right to know may not be significantly greater where the venture company is owned solely by a public authority rather than by a combination of public authorities and private investors.”

Anya Proops of 11KBW was counsel for the police authority.

Last month it emerged that South West One was suing one of its founder authorities, Somerset County Council, in a row over payments for procurement savings. The authority rejected the claims and said it would make counter-claims where it felt it had suffered losses.

_________________________________________________________________

CPD courses from just £17.50 (+VAT)

 

LGTV_logo_final_350_pxl

 

Online webinar - available 24/7
Online webinar - available 24/7
Online webinar - available 24/7
Online webinar - available 24/7
Online webinar - available 24/7
Online webinar - available 24/7

Try before you buy - your first course is free!

Click here to see the full list of courses on Local Government Law.tv

Unlimited access to all content for just £199 + VAT. Click here for more details.

_________________________________________________________________

 

 

Latest News

April 23, 2014

Minister stresses importance of overview and scrutiny in combined authorities

A government minister has written to the leaders of constituent and non-constituent councils in three recently-created combined authorities to highlight the importance of following good practice on overview and scrutiny. Read more
April 22, 2014

Pickles threatens five councils over alleged breaches of publicity code

The Communities Secretary has threatened five London councils with legal directions over alleged breaches of the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity. Read more
April 22, 2014

Justice Secretary hits out at "inappropriate" use of judicial review

Society is “too legalistic” and the legal system is being “exploited inappropriately by pressure groups with a political point to make”, the Justice Secretary has claimed. Read more
April 17, 2014

Met Police find "no credible evidence of criminality" in Tower Hamlets files

The Metropolitan Police has found “no credible evidence of criminality” within files it received about the London Borough of Tower Hamlets to provide reasonable grounds to suspect that fraud or any other offence has… Read more
April 16, 2014

ICO raps two councils after data breaches involving social services records

Two local authorities have given undertakings to the Information Commissioner’s Office after breaches of the Data Protection Act in relation to social services records. Read more
April 16, 2014

Council and Leader defeat £670k slander claim over childrens care homes

A High Court judge has dismissed a £670,000 claim for slander brought against a borough council and its leader by two companies that operate residential children’s care homes in its area. Read more
April 15, 2014

LGPS Advisory Board publishes QC opinion on tobacco investment

An administering authority for Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) funds may choose to take into account the public health implications of tobacco investment but only if the result of such consideration is the… Read more

 

Features

Dialogue iStock 000009191235XSmall 146X219
April 10, 2014

Consultation – backing no horses, and the importance of interim relief

David Hart QC looks at the lessons to be learned from a recent Court of Appeal ruling that a council had failed to consult properly on the closure of a day care centre. Read more
Money iStock 000008683901XSmall 146x219
April 02, 2014

Are local authorities bound by Ombudsman recommendations?

A High Court judge recently ruled that a council's decision to pay a developer only 20% of the £250,000 recommended by the Local Government Ombudsman was lawful. Nicholas Dobson analyses the case. Read more
April 02, 2014

The Duty of Candour - and general transparency

The Department of Health has published details of the proposed statutory Duty of Candour for health and adult social care providers, as well as a new general transparency duty. Corinne Slingo, Tracey Longfield and Belinda Dix examine the key points. Read more
April 02, 2014

Local authority control of charities - what are the limits?

The ties between a local authority and a charity were the subject of a recent Charity Commission report. Rachel Tonkin looks at the issues raised and the lessons to be learned. Read more
March 26, 2014

It's a sin to tell a lie

Jon Baines looks at the data protection issues raised by councils' use of voice risk analysis when benefit claimants are on the telephone. Read more
March 20, 2014

(Probably) the first group action for damages under the Data Protection Act

In December 2013 a group legal action was settled against a London borough following breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Human Rights Act 1998. Anna Thwaites, who acted for the claimants, explains the legal basis for the claims. Read more

 

 

Knowledge Bank

May 18, 2012

Managing in a Political Environment

Author: Nicholas Dobson, Freeth Cartwright This paper outlines the changing role of the local government lawyer in the context of the legal, political and constitutional framework of local government. This paper looks at the legal powers that underpin the role of local authorities, including the…
April 19, 2012

General Power of Confidence – ‘A New Hope’?

Author: Nicholas Dobson, Freeth Cartwright The general power of competence has been designed to give councils the confidence to act, using the power as their primary tool, without needing to refer back to central government. The question is: will the new power deliver?
March 27, 2012

Predetermination and Bias - Can Careless Talk Still Cost Decisions?

Author: Nicholas Dobson, Freeth Cartwright Ministers entered government much exercised about the law surrounding predetermination. In the opinion of some, this was a conspiracy by local government lawyers to undermine the democratic process. And they were going to have none of it! The 2010…
March 15, 2012

Recent developments in freedom of information

Author: Anya Proops, 11KBW The body of jurisprudence relating to freedom of information has continued to develop apace over the last year. The exponential growth in appeals being heard by both the first-tier and upper tribunals has meant that practitioners are having to work ever harder to keep…

Older news and features

March 26, 2014

It's a sin to tell a lie

Click here for full section archive

Wilkin Chapman Goolden

Featured Jobs

Harrogate Chief Solicitor


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here

 

Howell Christie Ltd

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts

 

 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

Is the role of monitoring officer worth the risk?