Councils face "deluge" of disputes from draft care reforms: MPs and peers PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 12:14

Local authorities could face a “deluge” of disputes and legal challenges as a result of the Government’s reforms in the Draft Care & Support Bill, MPs and peers have warned.

In a report, the Joint Committee on the Draft Care & Support Bill said: “The introduction of a capped cost scheme, which will result in many more people being assessed and entitled to a personal budget, is likely to lead to an increase in disputes and legal challenges.

“We are not confident that ministers have yet fully thought through the implications for local authorities of these changes. In particular we believe that the arrangements for redress and complaints resolution must be reviewed to ensure that they are fit for purpose.”

The report called for independent resolution of disputes over decisions about care and support – “and costs that count towards the cap”­ – through a Care and Support Tribunal.

The joint committee also called for:

  • A national campaign to raise awareness of what the national care and support offer is, how people can plan and prepare for their own care needs, and what rights they have to care and support.
  • Information and advice for all (including self funders) about support, care planning and housing options.
  • A new power to mandate joint budgets and commissioning across health, care and housing, “such as support for the frail elderly, making it simpler for NHS and local councils to pool budgets”.
  • Fast-tracking of care and support assessments for terminally-ill people.
  • An end to ‘contracting by the minute’ whereby care workers "sometimes spend just fifteen minutes with the person being cared for".
  • New legal rights for young carers “to protect them from inappropriate caring responsibilities and ensure they get the support they need”.
  • An obligation on the Secretary of State to take into account the draft Bill’s well-being principle when designing and setting a national eligibility threshold.
  • Stronger measures on safeguarding, “including explicit responsibilities for local authorities to prevent the abuse and neglect”.
  • Greater clarity on the boundary between NHS continuing care which is free and means-tested social care, which is not. The current wording of the Bill was likely to lead to the unintended consequence that more people in residential care would fall into the means-tested system, the committee said.
  • A statutory duty of candour providing stronger protection for recipients of care or support services. This echoes the duty recently called for by Robert Francis QC in his report into failings at Mid Staffordshire hospital.

The committee meanwhile warned that restricting support and care to those with the highest levels of need would become “entirely self-defeating, because it shunts costs into acute NHS care and undermines interventions to prevent and postpone the need for formal care and support”.

Paul Burstow MP, chair of the joint committee, said: "We need care and support to be more focused on prevention and more joined up with health and housing. There is much in the government’s draft Bill to welcome; it cuts through a complex web of arcane legislation that people struggle with. But there is room for improvement.

“The government must take stock of its funding for adult care and support and think seriously about whether the transformation we all want to see can truly be delivered without greater resources.”

Burstow added: “There is a growing imperative to join-up services so they fit around people's lives and make the best use of resources. The whole system must shift its emphasis away from crises and towards prevention and early intervention. The draft Bill helps, but we believe it could do more."

A copy of the report can be viewed here


Latest News

April 17, 2014

Benefits of McKenzie Friends outweigh risks: Legal Services Consumer Panel

The access to justice benefits of having fee-charging Mckenzie Friends outweigh the risks, a report by the Legal Services Consumer Panel (LSCP) has said. Read more
April 16, 2014

Watchdog issues briefing on Supreme Court deprivation of liberty ruling

The Care Quality Commission has published a briefing on the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards for providers in the light of a landmark ruling last month by the Supreme Court. Read more
April 15, 2014

Family President makes adoption order in "final chapter" of C-section case

The President of the Family Division has this month made an adoption order for the baby girl at the centre of a high-profile case where the Court of Protection authorised a delivery by Caesarean section. Read more
April 14, 2014

Supreme Court to hear case on EU migrants and temporary inability to work

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an EU national’s appeal over a ruling that he was not eligible for housing assistance from a local authority as his inability to work was not temporary. Read more
April 10, 2014

Consultation – backing no horses, and the importance of interim relief

David Hart QC looks at the lessons to be learned from a recent Court of Appeal ruling that a council had failed to consult properly on the closure of a day care centre. Read more



Data inspection iStock 000008204804XSmall 146x219
April 02, 2014

The Duty of Candour - and general transparency

The Department of Health has published details of the proposed statutory Duty of Candour for health and adult social care providers, as well as a new general transparency duty. Corinne Slingo, Tracey Longfield and Belinda Dix examine the key points. Read more
adult social services portrait1
April 02, 2014

The Better Care Fund - what is in it for housing providers?

What opportunities does the Better Care Fund offer housing providers? David Owens explains. Read more
March 26, 2014

Damages for deprivation of liberty

The Court of Protection team at 39 Essex Street consider what can be learned from two damages settlements for deprivations of liberty. Read more
March 20, 2014

Getting capacity right

The Court of Protection team at 39 Essex Street examine a case concerning the crossover between the inherent jurisdiction and the CoP. Read more
February 26, 2014

The Care Bill, eligibility criteria and consultation

Jonathan Auburn and Benjamin Tankel examine the introduction through the Care Bill of new eligibility criteria and consider whether local authorities will need to consult and conduct equalities impact analysis. Read more


Older news and features

March 20, 2014

Getting capacity right

February 20, 2014

Who pays?

Click here for full section archive

Now Previewing on Zambrano Update (Click on symbol in bottom right-hand corner for full size.)

Featured Jobs

DAC Beachcroft Healthcare Regulatoy Lawyer

CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here


No 37 Park Square Chambers
InRealTime Translation


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts





Snap Judgement

Is the role of monitoring officer worth the risk?