By using this site, you consent to the use of cookies. This site uses cookies to provide enhanced functionality and to analyse how visitors use the site, but it does not identify individual users.
20 more local authorities join Community Infrastructure Levy front runners project
Thursday, 30 June 2011 00:00
A group of 20 local authorities have joined the Community Infrastructure Levy front runners project, Planning Minister Greg Clark has revealed.
As a front runner, the council concerned will be given a package of support from the Planning Advisory Service to help set the charge in their area. This will include group workshops and good practice advice.
The councils selected for phase two are:
London Borough of Barnet
Barnsley Metropolitan Council
Bristol City Council
Cambridgeshire Horizons (East Cambs District Council and Huntingdonshire District Council)
Chelmsford Borough Council
London Borough of Croydon
Elmbridge Borough Council
Gedling Borough Council
Havant Borough Council
London Borough of Islington
Milton Keynes Council
Oxford City Council
Plymouth City Council
Redcar and Cleveland Council
St Helens Council
London Borough of Sutton
Swindon Borough Council
Torbay Council
London Borough of Wandsworth
Wycombe District Council
The Department for Communities and Local Government claimed that the CIL would give councils more choice and flexibility in how they fund infrastructure. The levy had the potential to raise £1bn a year by 2016, it added.
Greg Clark said: "Yet again we've seen a lot of enthusiasm from councils eager to introduce the reformed Community Infrastructure Levy, to ensure the many benefits development can bring are not lost to local communities.
"This second wave of Front Runners will ensure local neighbourhoods reap the rewards from growth in their areas and provide valuable lessons others can learn from in the future."
A revised version of the DCLG's Community Infrastructure Levy overview document is available here.
Add comment
The use of pseudonyms is permitted. Supplying an email address is optional and will not be published or used for any purpose other than notifying you of new comments on this article (if requested below).
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case over whether a recreation ground provided by a local authority in exercise of its statutory powers for local people to take part in lawful sports and pastimes can be… Read more
Campaigners have launched a judicial review challenge to the first scheme to be promoted by a local authority under the infrastructure planning and consenting regime contained in the Planning Act 2008. Read more
A recent High Court judgment considered the sometime murky question of whether ministerial statements amount to material considerations in the determination of planning decisions. Suzan Yildiz and Adam Baker consider the relevant practice points… Read more
David Brock analyses a recent High Court judgment that found a purported s. 106 agreement was invalid, and calls on the DCLG to address the problems the case raised. Read more
How does planning law fit with the rights of the family and of the child under international law? David Hart QC analyses a recent High Court ruling. Read more
There has been plenty of action this week on the tenders front, most notably with the news that the London Boroughs Legal Alliance is to establish a new solicitors framework agreement from this October.
If you’re a householder, having to take legal proceedings must be a nuisance. And even more so when the issue is a nuisance at law; and a toxic one at that.
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.