By using this site, you consent to the use of cookies. This site uses cookies to provide enhanced functionality and to analyse how visitors use the site, but it does not identify individual users.
Government consults on devolution of decision-making on local transport schemes
Tuesday, 31 January 2012 12:29
Local transport bodies could have the power from 2015 to make decisions on capital funding for local schemes, under proposals issued for consultation by the Department for Transport.
Under the current regime, central government must approve all schemes worth more than £5m.
The consultation sets out plans for the devolution of control of decisions and budgets for local transport schemes, such as new local roads, transport schemes, pedestrian routes, and new local rail stations.
According to the DfT, the primary role of local transport bodies – including local enterprise partnerships and local authorities – would be “to agree, manage and oversee the delivery of a prioritised programme of transport schemes from 2015 onwards”.
Elements of the proposals include:
Government funding for schemes would be allocated by formula, rather than through a competitive bidding process. Indicative allocations will be published for each LEP area by August 2012;
Transport bodies would need to decide and agree their prioritised programme of schemes by April 2013;
The lack of a £5m threshold for a major scheme would mean “that a scheme of any size or on any network could potentially be prioritised and funded within a given allocation, where this is seen as a local priority”;
Transport bodies would be expected, as now, to secure third party contributions;
Transport bodies would need to provide assurance on governance and financial management arrangements, accountability for decisions and value for money;
Individual schemes will need to meet minimum value for money thresholds, be appraised in line with the DfT’s webTAG best practice guidance and follow the Transport Business Case framework. “But capable local transport bodies would have the freedom to appraise schemes themselves”;
The system is designed to encourage decision-making across LEP boundaries to local transport consortia. However, the DfT said the government would not force consortia formations; and
Transport bodies would oversee the delivery of individual schemes, but would not be the vehicle for delivery. This would remain with individual local authorities or other relevant delivery agencies.
The level of funding available for the period post-April 2015 will be decided “in due course”. The DfT is expected to spend around £1.7bn on local transport schemes between 2011 and 2015. The average cost to central government of a local major scheme under the previous government’s regional funding allocation was around £30m.
Transport Secretary Justine Greening said: “We want a system that is much more responsive to local needs and it makes good sense to give local residents and passengers a greater say in the transport infrastructure that they rely on so much.
“These proposals could hand real power to communities so they can make locally accountable decisions on what transport improvements are needed in their area.”
A copy of the consultation paper, Devolving local major transport schemes, can be viewed here.
Add comment
The use of pseudonyms is permitted. Supplying an email address is optional and will not be published or used for any purpose other than notifying you of new comments on this article (if requested below).
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.
Campaigners have launched a judicial review challenge to the first scheme to be promoted by a local authority under the infrastructure planning and consenting regime contained in the Planning Act 2008. Read more
A High Court judge has awarded Leeds City Council £2m in interim costs in the latest stage of a bitter dispute with a property developer over the building of a new arena. Read more
The Government has issued guidance to Local Enterprise Partnerships on how to deliver projects using the new round of European Structural and Investment Funds for 2014-20. Read more
A recent High Court judgment considered the sometime murky question of whether ministerial statements amount to material considerations in the determination of planning decisions. Suzan Yildiz and Adam Baker consider the relevant practice points… Read more
The role of Section 106 agreements is being challenged by reforms such as the Community Infrastructure Levy and changes in the Growth and Infrastructure Bill. Chad Sutton analyses the latest developments. Read more
Now Previewing on LGL.tv: Local Authority Joint Ventures(Click on the arrow to begin. Preview is shown smaller than actual size - click on bottom right of screen for full size.)
There has been plenty of action this week on the tenders front, most notably with the news that the London Boroughs Legal Alliance is to establish a new solicitors framework agreement from this October.
If you’re a householder, having to take legal proceedings must be a nuisance. And even more so when the issue is a nuisance at law; and a toxic one at that.
Latest Blog Posts
There has been plenty of action this week on the tenders front, most notably with the news that the London Boroughs Legal Alliance is to establish a new solicitors framework agreement from this October.
If you’re a householder, having to take legal proceedings must be a nuisance. And even more so when the issue is a nuisance at law; and a toxic one at that.
This entry reports on when and how changes introduced by the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 will be brought into force.
All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.