North Hertfordshire DC
Restrictive covenants and planning PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 01 February 2012 17:14

Michael Fahy considers the recent Court of Appeal decision of Zenios v Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1645 on the Lands Tribunal's refusal to modify a restrictive covenant.

The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the Lands Tribunal – now the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) – to refuse to modify restrictions prohibiting alterations to the external appearance of any house within the suburb without the consent of the Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust Ltd (the “Trust”).

This case is a useful reminder that planning law and estate management schemes can operate as independent dual systems of control. Developers should ensure they obtain both planning permission and consent from those with the benefit of a restrictive covenant, as the mere existence of planning permission will not override the authority of those benefiting from a restriction.

The appellants wanted to construct a first floor extension over their garage and argued that, under Section 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925, the Lands Tribunal should have modified or discharged the terms of the restrictive covenant preventing their development for the following reasons:

  1. the planning authority had already granted planning permission to construct the extension and the Trust’s decision should be driven by this decision; and
  2. in any event, the payment of money would be an adequate compensation for any loss or disadvantage.

Power to make independent decisions

The Judge ruled that it was for the Trust to reach its own independent view on the application and that it was entitled to arrive at the decision at which it did. It was held that the planning authority’s decisions “fall to be considered” but do not drive the decision to be made by the Trust. The Judge went on to comment that there was nothing unorthodox in a state of affairs where there are two controls, the local planning authority and the Trust, rather than just one upon the implementation of proposals such as these. Moreover, it was held that, if it were Parliament’s intention for the decisions of a planning authority to prevail in such circumstances, then one would expect that to be specifically provided for in the legislation.

Money as compensation

The Court confirmed that the Trust had a duty to act for the promotion of the public interest on behalf of those in the amenities of the area in question. It was ruled that the damage to the public interest represented by the Trust could not sensibly be compensated by money. While reaching its decision, the Court differentiated between the loss of amenity to an individual (where money could perhaps be an adequate compensation) and the loss of amenity to the public as a whole (where money could not be an adequate compensation).

Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

Appropriation by local authorities

Local authorities are in the unique position of being able to override private rights such as restrictive covenants under Section 237 of the Town and Country Planning Act (“TCPA”) 1990, as described in Kate Silverman’s article in Local Government Lawyer.

Further amendments to this power have been introduced by the Planning Act 2008. Paragraph 4 of Schedule 9 to that Act amends Section 237 of the TCPA so as to authorise the use of land which has been acquired or appropriated by a local authority for planning purposes, even if the use interferes with a private right or is in breach of a restriction as to the user of land arising by virtue of a contract. This change was introduced following the anomaly decision of Thames Water Utilities v Oxford City Council [1999] 1 E.G.L.R. 167 where it was held that the express wording of Section 237 did not override private rights triggered by a material change of use as distinct from the carrying out of works etc. as stated in section 237.

Therefore, if a local authority appropriates land for planning purposes, the current position is that the erection, construction, and carrying out of any works on the land or use of the land is authorised if it is done in accordance with the planning permission, notwithstanding that it may interfere with private restrictions. The effect of this is that private rights are overridden and converted into claims for monetary compensation.

Michael Fahy is Head of Real Estate at Steeles Law. He can be contacted on 020 7421 1720 or by email at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

Latest News

July 31, 2014

First site sold under public land disposal pilot scheme run by HCA

The first site has been sold under the Homes and Communities Agency’s public land disposal pilot scheme. Read more
July 30, 2014

Government backs Article 4 direction by council on office-to-resi conversions

The Government has agreed to a council’s Article 4 direction on changes of use from office to residential, subject to modifications. Read more
July 29, 2014

District pays £3.6m to settle claim brought by housing association

A district council has agreed to pay a housing association £3.6m to settle a dispute over properties transferred in 1996. Read more
July 24, 2014

London borough faces judicial review challenge to selective licensing scheme

A scheme for licensing private landlords is facing a threat of judicial review in the London Borough of Enfield. Read more
July 21, 2014

Law Society delays new CON 29 and CON 29O enquiry forms

The Law Society has delayed the introduction of new CON 29 and CON 29O enquiry forms. Read more
July 18, 2014

Council slams ministers for revoking Art 4 direction on office-to-flats conversions

The London Borough of Islington has reacted angrily to a decision by ministers to revoke an Article 4 direction that the council had made removing permitted development rights to convert properties from office to… Read more
July 18, 2014

Building owner to pay £40k+ after failure to comply with enforcement notice

A building owner must pay more than £40,000 as part of a crackdown by Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea planning enforcement officers in some of London’s most exclusive areas. Read more

 

Features

Village green iStock 000009004124XSmall 146x219
July 10, 2014

Trigger happy?

Emma Porritt and James Garbett look at additional trigger events to prevent applications to register town and village greens. Read more
Dialogue iStock 000009191235XSmall 146X219
July 10, 2014

Making yourself heard

Telecommunication leases may deliver an additional source of income for local authorities and other public bodies but at what cost? Cynyr Rhys examines the issues. Read more
July 03, 2014

What you need to know about district heat networks

Mark Routley looks at the opportunities and challenges for local authorities presented by district heat networks. Read more
July 03, 2014

High Court guidance on commercial service charges

The High Court has recently provided some useful guidance on commercial service charges, anticipated expenditure and apportionment, writes David Bird. Read more
June 26, 2014

The local authorities’ perspective on fracking

David Brammer discusses the role local government has to play in awarding fracking rights and regulating the industry. Read more
June 26, 2014

New services from the Land Registry

Bill Chandler highlights several significant recent developments from the Land Registry which affect all local authority lawyers involved with land and property, whether dealing with residential properties or complex commercial premises. Read more
June 19, 2014

Heritage partnership agreements

Richard Harwood QC discusses the new power to enter into heritage agreements under s. 26A of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. Read more

 

Older news and features

July 10, 2014

Trigger happy?

July 10, 2014

Making yourself heard

June 19, 2014

Green day

May 15, 2014

What’s the use?

Click here for full section archive

Featured Jobs

Christchurch and East Dorsets Councils


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here

 

No 37 Park Square Chambers

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts

 

 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

Will the SRA's decision to remove the 16 hour minimum training requirement...