Ministers promise councils greater freedoms over travellers site provision PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 26 March 2012 00:00

Streamlined government guidance will put the provision of travellers sites “back into the hands of local councils, in consultation with local communities”, ministers have claimed.

The revised guidance issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government is just eight pages long, compared to 54 previously.

Ministers said local authorities would have the “freedom and responsibility” to determine the right level of site provision in their area.

The guidance sets out the Government’s view that traveller sites are inappropriate development for Green Belt land. “[It] makes clear that there should be due regard for the protection of the local environment and amenities when local authorities set out their criteria for allocating sites,” it adds.

The Department also said there would be changes to planning law to limit retrospective planning applications for any form of unauthorised development, as well as the introduction of incentives for new and refurbished traveller sites. This will deliver a better balance between site provision and enforcement, it argued.

The DCLG has identified a number of “key aims” in relation to travellers sites. These are:

  • “local planning authorities should make their own assessment of need for the purposes of planning;
  • to ensure that local planning authorities, working collaboratively, develop fair and effective strategies to meet need through the identification of land for sites;
  • to encourage local planning authorities to plan for sites over a reasonable timescale;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should protect the Green Belt from inappropriate development;
  • to promote more private traveller site provision while recognising that there will always be those travellers who cannot provide their own sites;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should aim to reduce the number of unauthorised developments and encampments and make enforcement more effective;
  • for local planning authorities to ensure their local plan includes fair, realistic and inclusive policies;
  • to increase the number of traveller sites in appropriate locations with planning permission, to address under-provision and maintain an appropriate level of supply;
  • to reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities in plan-making and planning decisions;
  • to enable provision of suitable accommodation from which travellers can access education, health, welfare and employment infrastructure; and
  • for local planning authorities to have due regard to the protection of local amenities and the local environmental.”

The Government suggested that planning rules had harmed community relations over recent years, “by imposing top-down targets for traveller sites on local councils, increasing the number of unauthorised sites, and compelling councils to encroach onto the Green Belt”.

Ministers also argued that previous policy had created a perception of special treatment for some travellers, and that this undermined the notion of fair play in the system.

The DCLG insisted that its changes would reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities.

Local Government Minister Bob Neill said: "Top-down targets from central Government failed to provide adequate land for travellers and caused tensions with the local settled community. People want to see fair play in the planning system, treating everyone fairly and equally.

"These new policies will allow local authorities to govern their own affairs whilst ensuring that both travellers and the settled communities get a fair deal through the planning system."

A report from a Ministerial Working Group examining the inequalities faced by traveller groups is expected shortly.

The revised policy can be downloaded here.

 

Add comment

The use of pseudonyms is permitted. Supplying an email address is optional and will not be published or used for any purpose other than notifying you of new comments on this article (if requested below).

All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.


Latest News

May 15, 2013

High Court battle begins over housing benefit regulations and "bedroom tax"

The High Court has begun hearing the judicial review challenge over new housing benefit regulations that came into force on 1 April. Read more
May 15, 2013

Council secures major cut in damages payable over unlawful eviction

A local authority has substantially reduced the amount of damages payable as a result of its unlawful eviction of a secure tenant from residential accommodation. Read more
May 14, 2013

Social housing group puts £2-4m in legal work up for grabs

A group of registered housing providers has launched the procurement of a legal services framework agreement worth £2-4m over its lifetime. Read more
May 10, 2013

Major reforms to permitted development to come into force on 30 May: Pickles

Major reforms to the permitted development regime will come into force on 30 May, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has announced. Read more
May 09, 2013

Relief for councils after landmark Supreme Court ruling on social services duty

Westminster City Council hailed a “crucial precedent” for local authorities today after the Supreme Court clarified the scope of their duty to provide accommodation to vulnerable individuals. Read more

 

Features

RCJ portrait 146x219
May 16, 2013

Homeless persons, vulnerability and personal circumstances

The Court of Appeal has provided important guidance on the matters to be taken into account when deciding whether a homeless person is “vulnerable” for the purposes of the Homelessness Act 1996. Paul Brown QC explains the ruling. Read more
Anti-Social 2 iStock 000001684994XSmall 146x219
May 08, 2013

Anti-social behaviour - the future

Andy Lane reviews the latest developments as the Government seeks to reform the approach to tackling anti-social behaviour. Read more
April 24, 2013

Don’t look down

The Court of Appeal has looked at whether a homeless applicant with a fear of heights could refuse an offer of accommodation the local authority considered suitable. Alexander Campbell assesses the implications. Read more
April 24, 2013

Local authorities and families with no recourse to public funds

Jonathan Auburn and Benjamin Tankel review three recent cases relating to the duty of local authorities to provide for families with no recourse to public funds. Read more
April 10, 2013

Interim payments, Zambrano and final determination of benefits claims

A High Court judge has handed down the latest Zambrano ruling. Catherine Rowlands analyses the judgment and sets out the further cases to be heard. Read more

 

Older news and features

April 24, 2013

Don’t look down

April 04, 2013

ECO sounding

March 27, 2013

Talking tough

March 21, 2013

BUDGET 2013: THE REACTION

Click here for full section archive

Now Previewing on LGL.tv: Possession and Proportionality (Click on bottom right of screen for full size.)

Featured Jobs


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

LGTV logo final 280 pxl

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts


 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

How is the post Localism Act standards regime working in practice?