Planning Enforcement 2nd Edition

Ministers promise councils greater freedoms over travellers site provision PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 26 March 2012 00:00

Streamlined government guidance will put the provision of travellers sites “back into the hands of local councils, in consultation with local communities”, ministers have claimed.

The revised guidance issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government is just eight pages long, compared to 54 previously.

Ministers said local authorities would have the “freedom and responsibility” to determine the right level of site provision in their area.

The guidance sets out the Government’s view that traveller sites are inappropriate development for Green Belt land. “[It] makes clear that there should be due regard for the protection of the local environment and amenities when local authorities set out their criteria for allocating sites,” it adds.

The Department also said there would be changes to planning law to limit retrospective planning applications for any form of unauthorised development, as well as the introduction of incentives for new and refurbished traveller sites. This will deliver a better balance between site provision and enforcement, it argued.

The DCLG has identified a number of “key aims” in relation to travellers sites. These are:

  • “local planning authorities should make their own assessment of need for the purposes of planning;
  • to ensure that local planning authorities, working collaboratively, develop fair and effective strategies to meet need through the identification of land for sites;
  • to encourage local planning authorities to plan for sites over a reasonable timescale;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should protect the Green Belt from inappropriate development;
  • to promote more private traveller site provision while recognising that there will always be those travellers who cannot provide their own sites;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should aim to reduce the number of unauthorised developments and encampments and make enforcement more effective;
  • for local planning authorities to ensure their local plan includes fair, realistic and inclusive policies;
  • to increase the number of traveller sites in appropriate locations with planning permission, to address under-provision and maintain an appropriate level of supply;
  • to reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities in plan-making and planning decisions;
  • to enable provision of suitable accommodation from which travellers can access education, health, welfare and employment infrastructure; and
  • for local planning authorities to have due regard to the protection of local amenities and the local environmental.”

The Government suggested that planning rules had harmed community relations over recent years, “by imposing top-down targets for traveller sites on local councils, increasing the number of unauthorised sites, and compelling councils to encroach onto the Green Belt”.

Ministers also argued that previous policy had created a perception of special treatment for some travellers, and that this undermined the notion of fair play in the system.

The DCLG insisted that its changes would reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities.

Local Government Minister Bob Neill said: "Top-down targets from central Government failed to provide adequate land for travellers and caused tensions with the local settled community. People want to see fair play in the planning system, treating everyone fairly and equally.

"These new policies will allow local authorities to govern their own affairs whilst ensuring that both travellers and the settled communities get a fair deal through the planning system."

A report from a Ministerial Working Group examining the inequalities faced by traveller groups is expected shortly.

The revised policy can be downloaded here.

 

Add comment

The use of pseudonyms is permitted. Supplying an email address is optional and will not be published or used for any purpose other than notifying you of new comments on this article (if requested below).

All comments will be moderated before publication. We reserve the right not to publish comments that are offensive, defamatory or irrelevant to the topic.


Latest News

May 14, 2013

Supreme Court to hear village green case over status of recreation ground

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case over whether a recreation ground provided by a local authority in exercise of its statutory powers for local people to take part in lawful sports and pastimes can be… Read more
May 10, 2013

Major reforms to permitted development to come into force on 30 May: Pickles

Major reforms to the permitted development regime will come into force on 30 May, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has announced. Read more
May 07, 2013

County sees off double JR challenge to permission for energy-from-waste plant

A county council has defeated two judicial review challenges to its decision to grant planning permission for an energy-from-waste plant. Read more
May 07, 2013

Local authority-promoted Planning Act 2008 scheme faces judicial review

Campaigners have launched a judicial review challenge to the first scheme to be promoted by a local authority under the infrastructure planning and consenting regime contained in the Planning Act 2008. Read more
May 03, 2013

District defeats High Court challenge to CPO of iconic amusement park site

A district council has fought off a High Court challenge to a compulsory purchase order for the site of a former amusement park. Read more

 

Features

Construction iStock 000002149516XSmall 146x219
May 16, 2013

Heritage reform and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013

New legislation looks set to speed up the process of applying for listed building consent, writes David Merson. Read more
Money iStock 000008683901XSmall 146x219
May 02, 2013

Highway to CIL

Government proposals to reform further the Community Infrastructure Levy have a focus on highway works. Matt Gilks analyses the measures. Read more
April 24, 2013

Ministerial statements – material considerations or trivial pursuits?

A recent High Court judgment considered the sometime murky question of whether ministerial statements amount to material considerations in the determination of planning decisions. Suzan Yildiz and Adam Baker consider the relevant practice points… Read more
April 24, 2013

The s. 106 that wasn't a s. 106

David Brock analyses a recent High Court judgment that found a purported s. 106 agreement was invalid, and calls on the DCLG to address the problems the case raised. Read more
April 24, 2013

Planning policy versus the UN rights of the child

How does planning law fit with the rights of the family and of the child under international law? David Hart QC analyses a recent High Court ruling. Read more

 

Older news and features

April 04, 2013

Nullity points

March 27, 2013

Love you to death?

March 21, 2013

BUDGET 2013: THE REACTION

February 13, 2013

State of play

Click here for full section archive

Now Previewing on LGL.tv: Duties of Consultation and Disclosure Owed by Planning Authorities (Click on bottom right of screen for full size.)

Featured Jobs


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

LLM Planning and Environmental Law

LGTV logo final 280 pxl

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts


 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

How is the post Localism Act standards regime working in practice?

39 Essex Street