Legal Assistants (Litigation and Planning)
Ministers promise councils greater freedoms over travellers site provision PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 26 March 2012 00:00

Streamlined government guidance will put the provision of travellers sites “back into the hands of local councils, in consultation with local communities”, ministers have claimed.

The revised guidance issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government is just eight pages long, compared to 54 previously.

Ministers said local authorities would have the “freedom and responsibility” to determine the right level of site provision in their area.

The guidance sets out the Government’s view that traveller sites are inappropriate development for Green Belt land. “[It] makes clear that there should be due regard for the protection of the local environment and amenities when local authorities set out their criteria for allocating sites,” it adds.

The Department also said there would be changes to planning law to limit retrospective planning applications for any form of unauthorised development, as well as the introduction of incentives for new and refurbished traveller sites. This will deliver a better balance between site provision and enforcement, it argued.

The DCLG has identified a number of “key aims” in relation to travellers sites. These are:

  • “local planning authorities should make their own assessment of need for the purposes of planning;
  • to ensure that local planning authorities, working collaboratively, develop fair and effective strategies to meet need through the identification of land for sites;
  • to encourage local planning authorities to plan for sites over a reasonable timescale;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should protect the Green Belt from inappropriate development;
  • to promote more private traveller site provision while recognising that there will always be those travellers who cannot provide their own sites;
  • that plan-making and decision-taking should aim to reduce the number of unauthorised developments and encampments and make enforcement more effective;
  • for local planning authorities to ensure their local plan includes fair, realistic and inclusive policies;
  • to increase the number of traveller sites in appropriate locations with planning permission, to address under-provision and maintain an appropriate level of supply;
  • to reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities in plan-making and planning decisions;
  • to enable provision of suitable accommodation from which travellers can access education, health, welfare and employment infrastructure; and
  • for local planning authorities to have due regard to the protection of local amenities and the local environmental.”

The Government suggested that planning rules had harmed community relations over recent years, “by imposing top-down targets for traveller sites on local councils, increasing the number of unauthorised sites, and compelling councils to encroach onto the Green Belt”.

Ministers also argued that previous policy had created a perception of special treatment for some travellers, and that this undermined the notion of fair play in the system.

The DCLG insisted that its changes would reduce tensions between settled and traveller communities.

Local Government Minister Bob Neill said: "Top-down targets from central Government failed to provide adequate land for travellers and caused tensions with the local settled community. People want to see fair play in the planning system, treating everyone fairly and equally.

"These new policies will allow local authorities to govern their own affairs whilst ensuring that both travellers and the settled communities get a fair deal through the planning system."

A report from a Ministerial Working Group examining the inequalities faced by traveller groups is expected shortly.

The revised policy can be downloaded here.

 

Latest News

April 24, 2014

Infrastructure and planning trio return to Bircham Dyson Bell

Three specialist major infrastructure and planning lawyers are to rejoin Bircham Dyson Bell less than a year after leaving for a rival law firm. Read more
April 09, 2014

County council scraps energy from waste contract at cost of £30m-plus

A county council is to terminate a £600m waste contract at a cost of more than £30m, blaming the “failure to secure satisfactory planning permission”. Read more
April 03, 2014

Campaigners rule out further appeal over redevelopment of football ground

Campaigners who sought to have the planning permission for the redevelopment of Bristol Rovers’ Memorial Ground quashed have ruled out taking the case to the Court of Appeal on costs grounds. Read more
April 01, 2014

London borough to use s. 106 agreements to tackle 'buy-to-leave' homes

A London borough is consulting on plans to use s. 106 agreements to tackle the issue of “buy-to-leave” homes. Read more
March 31, 2014

Campaigners net hearing over planning permission for QPR training ground

Campaigners seeking to challenge Ealing Council’s decision to grant Queen’s Park Rangers planning permission for the redevelopment of a sports ground and to give the club a 200-year lease have been granted an oral… Read more
March 27, 2014

Court backs decision to pay only 20% of £250k recommended by LGO

A district council has fended off a judicial review challenge to its decision to pay a complainant only 20% of a £250,000 sum recommended by the Local Government Ombudsman. Read more

 

Features

Planning 146x219
April 24, 2014

New permitted development rights in force

Polly Reynolds outlines the new permitted development rights introduced earlier this month. Read more
Money iStock 000008683901XSmall 146x219
April 16, 2014

Setting planning fees

Should local authorities be allowed to set their own planning fees? Polly Reynolds examines recent developments. Read more
April 16, 2014

Recent changes to the CIL regime: a summary

Jonathan Darby provides a summary of recent changes that affected the Community Infrastructure Levy. Read more
April 02, 2014

The Planning Court comes into being

Richard Harwood OBE QC analyses the introduction of a Planning Court this week and outlines the key changes. Read more
April 02, 2014

Are local authorities bound by Ombudsman recommendations?

A High Court judge recently ruled that a council's decision to pay a developer only 20% of the £250,000 recommended by the Local Government Ombudsman was lawful. Nicholas Dobson analyses the case. Read more
April 02, 2014

Retrospective validation, exceptional circumstances and the Whitley principle

The High Court recently upheld approvals for Cardiff’s Energy from Waste scheme. Simon Bird QC analyses the case. Read more
April 02, 2014

Further chinks in the armour of town and village green status

Polly Reynolds analyses the likely impact of a key Supreme Court ruling on rectification of the register of town and village greens. Read more

 

Older news and features

March 05, 2014

Core stability

March 05, 2014

The sound and the fury

February 26, 2014

Applying the sequential test

February 13, 2014

Action stations

Click here for full section archive

Now Previewing on LGL.tv: Green Belt Development - The Legal Issues (Click on bottom right of screen for full size.)

Featured Jobs

Ashford Borough Council Planning Lawyer
East Sussex Solicitor Planning and Highways


CLICK HERE to search all current vacancies

Featured Courses & Events

50% off LGLtv subscriptions

Sign up for Courses and Events Updates

* indicates required

Services v2

Yellow pages iStock 000009762383XSmall cropTo access details of individual advertisers, please click on the relevant banner below.

To search all entries in the Local Government Lawyer Services Directory, please click here

 

Easton Bevins Chartered Surveyors
Ivy Legal

 


 Shout_to_the_top_looking_left_iStock_000006002590XSmall_98x74 Latest Blog Posts

 

 


 

Ballot_iStock_000006080605XSmall_thumb

Snap Judgement

Is the role of monitoring officer worth the risk?