The current approach to judicial diversity is not working and large scale structural and cultural change is required, law reform organisation Justice has claimed.

A report from a Justice working party, Increasing Judicial Diversity: An Update, has recommended:

The update builds on JUSTICE’s 2017 Increasing Judicial Diversity report.

The working party said that, analysing appointments data since 2017, it had found that “despite the clear case for increased judicial diversity, progress has remained slow”.

There had been some welcome headline achievements, it said, including two more women Justices appointed to the Supreme Court, the appointment of four more solicitors to the High Court and the appointment of Sir Rabinder Singh to the Court of Appeal.

However, most appointments to the senior courts had continued “much as before”.

There had been some improvement in the percentages of women appointed to the Circuit and High Court bench, however the overall numbers remained low meaning that progress was fragile, JUSTICE said.

The data demonstrated that there had been negligible improvement in respect of other underrepresented groups, JUSTICE claimed.

Andrea Coomber, Director of JUSTICE, said: “Nearly three years since our last report there has been only modest progress towards a more diverse senior judiciary. Our senior judiciary continues to be dominated by white men from the independent Bar. We are continually assured that change is right around the corner and yet the homogeneity of appointments to the key feeder roles of Recorder and Deputy High Court judge give little reason for optimism.

“The judiciary play a critical role in our democracy and hold immense power in society. They can take away people’s liberty, their children, their rights and more. That such power is held by such an unrepresentative group of people – however meritorious – should be of concern to us all.”

In an update on judicial diversity published earlier this month the JAC highlighted:

The JAC update can be viewed here.