Housing iStock 000010695703Small 146x219Neil Brand sets out the key considerations for local authorities and landlords arising out of the Homes (Fitness for Habitation) Act.

Anyone with even a passing interest in social housing can’t have failed to notice the seemingly unstoppable passage of the Private Members’ Homes (Fitness for Habitation) Bill through Parliament over the last 12 months or so.

The Bill received Royal Assent on 20 December 2018 and the Homes (Fitness for Habitation) Act 2018 came into force on 20 March 2019.

The Act amends Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to require all landlords to ensure that their properties, including common parts, are fit for human habitation at the beginning of the tenancy and throughout.

The obligations imposed by the Act apply to:

What is “fit for human habitation”?

The provisions defining what is, and is not, fit for human habitation are contained in the amended s10 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and include:

In addition, if the property is subject to any of the 29 ‘hazards’ set out in Schedule 1 of the Housing Health and Safety (England) Regulations 2005, it will be deemed unfit for human habitation. Those hazards include:

Exceptions to liability

The Act does, however, list a number of exceptional circumstances where a landlord will not be liable for the lack of fitness for human habitation of premises, including:

Consequences of breach

In the event that a Court finds a landlord in breach of the Act, the landlord can be ordered to pay compensation to the tenant and/or to undertake works, including improvement works, to the premises. There is currently no prescribed limit on the compensation that a landlord can be ordered to pay. The lack of clarity in this respect should act as a further incentive to landlords to ensure that they are not in breach of the new legislation.

A further consequence of being found in breach of the Act is that landlords of assured shorthold tenants will not be able to avail themselves of the section 21 “no fault” possession procedure, provisions which effectively run alongside the protections already in place for such tenants from retaliatory evictions under the Deregulation Act 2014.

Notice and timeframes

Landlords are liable to effect repairs to remedy a hazard within “…a reasonable amount of time…” of being made aware of the existence of the defect by the tenant, although there is no notice requirement in relation to the common parts of a building, in which case a landlord will be deemed to be impliedly on notice.

As with disrepair under section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, what is a “reasonable amount of time” is not specifically defined by the legislation and will depend on all the relevant circumstances. The Act makes clear that a landlord should, upon being notified of a defect, ensure that it is taking active steps to remedy the defect and ensure that the premises are put back into a habitable condition, failing which the tenant can issue proceedings seeking damages and an order compelling the landlord to undertake the necessary works.

Next steps

Landlords should ensure that:

Local authorities

Stock-holding authorities, in their capacity as landlords, are subject to the Act in the same way as any other landlord. Therefore authorities should consider carrying out stock condition surveys to ensure that any premises in their ownership or management are compliant with the Act.The MHCLG has published Guidance for Local Authorities. This recommends that all authorities:

Neil Brand is a partner at Bevan Brittan. He can be contacted on 0370 194 7807 or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..