This page draws together a monthly selection of articles and features supplied by LexisNexis for publication on Local Government Lawyer and Public Law Today. We also showcase other publications and resources that LexisNexis produces to support lawyers working in the public sector. To see all articles, please click here.
Slide background

LiPS and McKenzie friends - public law

LiPS and McKenzie friends public law 55927441 s 146x219LexisPSL Local Government analyses the key issues where litigants in person and McKenzie friends are involved in public law children cases.

(To access all the links in this article, use your LexisPSL subscription to log in or register for a free 1 week trial of LexisPSL)

Background

Every party to care proceedings is entitled to a fair hearing, and the parents and child are entitled to the protection of their art 6 rights (right to a fair trial) under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as incorporated into the Human Rights Act 1998. There is no obligation to use a solicitor, although in care proceedings, as opposed to private law children proceedings, legal aid remains available for both the child and the parents, and to anyone else with parental responsibility, regardless of means, so the majority of parents are legally represented. Litigants in person are comparatively rare in that context. In other proceedings, such as applications for the discharge of care orders, the legal aid position differs, and it is more common to find parents acting for themselves. Moreover, other relatives of the child (who do not have parental responsibility) may become parties to care proceedings, and may not be able to afford legal representation.

References:

HRA 1998, Sch 1, Pt I

There are three broad situations that may arise in public children proceedings:

  • a litigant representing themselves, conducting their own case, and acting as their own advocate
  • such a person exercising their rights of audience, but with the help of a McKenzie friend, and
  • where a litigant in person asks that another person, who is not a qualified lawyer with rights of audience, should be allowed to exercise rights of audience on their behalf

In each case, the court and the local authority must ensure that the litigant’s ECHR, art 6 rights are not infringed.

References:

HRA 1998, s 6

The court must ensure all reasonable assistance is offered to the litigant in person in putting their case. It is unrealistic to require advocates for other parties, who oppose the litigant in person’s application, to assist in promoting it, whether by framing the questions to be asked of other parties or a reticence to challenge the contrary evidence. But an advocate must not gain an unfair advantage for their client because of the disadvantaged status of the litigant in person and must draw to the attention of the court any mistake in law or fact articulated, even if it favours their client.

References:

Re W (children) (special guardianship order: local authority’s appeal) [2014] EWCA Civ 405

The children’s guardian is not a neutral party and while they must provide the court with such other assistance that it may require, the court must never ask for such help in a way that renders the guardian, or their advocate, effectively engaging in advocacy on behalf of a party whose position is, or can be perceived to be, in conflict with that of the child. Nor must the guardian, in their inspection of records, advice to the court and service of documents, be seen as an advocate to the court.

References:

FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, 16.20

Re W (children) (special guardianship order: local authority’s appeal) [2014] EWCA Civ 405

If a litigant in person is the applicant in proceedings, the court bundle must be prepared by the first listed respondent who is not also a litigant in person. See also Practice Note: Preparation of court bundles in family proceedings.

References:

FPR 2010, PD 27A

Although some procedural latitude might be justified in respect of an appeal by a litigant in person, the appeal procedure under FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 30 is neither complicated nor onerous. The fact that an applicant for permission to appeal is a litigant in person is not a reason for relaxing or ignoring the ordinary procedural structure of an appeal or the requirements of the rules.

References:

Re D (children) (placement orders: appeal) [2015] EWCA Civ 409, [2016] 1 FLR 249

 

Practice guidance

The Bar Council, CILEx and the Law Society issued new guidelines on dealing with litigants in person in June 2015. The guidelines discuss the relationship between the client's interest and the interests of the administration of justice, and the extent to which a lawyer can properly provide assistance to a litigant in person. The guidelines also discuss the role of McKenzie friends. The guidelines are supplemented by notes to explain a lawyer's duties to their client and their responsibilities to the court, that may be given to a client or to a litigant in person.

Note that the Judicial Executive Board issued a consultation paper in February 2016 proposing reforms to the existing guidance in relation to McKenzie friends and the following guidelines may therefore be subject to amendment in due course. See News Analysis: Consultation recommends codified rules for McKenzie friends and fee ban.

The President of the Family Division and the Master of the Rolls issued joint guidance, Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts) in 2010 that provides, inter alia, that:

References:

Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts) [2010] 2 FLR 962

H (children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1797, [2012] All ER (D) 124 (Jun)

  • litigants in person ordinarily have a right to have reasonable assistance from a McKenzie friend, but the litigant remains a litigant in person, and the McKenzie friend has no right to act as advocate or conduct the litigation—the court retains the right to refuse to permit such help, and may do so ‘where it is satisfied that, in that case, the interests of justice and fairness’ do not require it
  • the McKenzie friend may provide moral support, take notes, help with case papers, and quietly give advice—the McKenzie friend may not act as the litigant’s agent, manage their cases outside court (eg signing court documents), address the court, examine witnesses or make oral submissions
  • for private hearings, ie the vast majority of care hearings, the litigant must justify the presence of the McKenzie friend in court, although there is a strong presumption in favour of allowing a Mckenzie friend to be present
  • the following factors are not reasons for the court to refuse to allow a McKenzie friend to be present:

- the case, application, directions hearing or case management hearing is simple or straightforward

- the litigant appears able to conduct the case without help

- the litigant has chosen to be unrepresented by a qualified lawyer

- the other party is unrepresented

- the proposed McKenzie friend belongs to an organisation that promotes a cause, or

- the proceedings are confidential and the court papers contain sensitive information about the family’s affairs

  • the request can be refused or rescinded if the appointment has undermined, or might undermine, the efficient administration of justice—the following factors are examples of reasons for the court to validly refuse an application for a litigant in person to be assisted by a Mckenzie friend:

- the help is being provided for an improper purpose

- the assistance is unreasonable in nature or degree

- the McKenzie friend is subject to a civil proceedings or civil restraint order

- the McKenzie friend is using the litigant as a puppet

- the McKenzie friend is directly or indirectly conducting the litigation, or

- the court is not satisfied that the McKenzie friend fully understands the duty of confidentiality

  • litigants can lawfully agree to pay fees to McKenzie friends for reasonable assistance in or out of court, such as for carrying out clerical or mechanical activities (eg photocopying, preparing bundles, serving papers), or for the provision of legal advice, but such fees cannot lawfully be recovered from the other parties

Only an ‘authorised’ person or an ‘exempt person’ can carry out ‘reserved legal activities’, which include conducting litigation and exercising rights of audience. The court has discretion to grant an exemption to conduct the litigation or act as an advocate for the litigant in person. On whether a McKenzie friend should have rights of audience the Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts) states that:

References:

LSA 2007, s 19, Sch 3

Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts) [2010] 2 FLR 962

  • McKenzie friends have no right of audience or right to conduct litigation—it is a criminal offence to do so, unless appropriately qualified or the court grants such rights for the case in question
  • the courts should be slow to grant such rights to any lay person, including a McKenzie friend
  • any application for rights of audience needs very careful consideration, and should only be granted for good reason, taking into account the specific facts of the case in question, and not granted for mere convenience, automatically or without due consideration — it is for the litigant to persuade the court
  • past examples of such justification have included:

- the person is a close relative

- health problems prevent the litigant from addressing the court or conducting the litigation, and they cannot afford to pay for a lawyer, and

- the litigant is relatively inarticulate, and prompting may prolong the proceedings unnecessarily

  • the grant of such rights to those who hold themselves out as professional advocates or professional McKenzie friends, or who seek to exercise those rights on a regular basis, will only be granted in exceptional circumstances — to do otherwise would tend to subvert Parliament’s will
  • if the court has not granted the right to conduct litigation, fees cannot be lawfully recovered from the litigant or the other parties — if the court grants the right, subsequently incurred fees can in principle be recovered from the litigant, but not the other parties
  • once the court has granted a right of audience, fees for advocacy are in principle recoverable from the litigant, and also from the opposing parties as recoverable disbursements

A judge has a wide discretion, as long as they have regard to the guidance, in whether to allow a person to act, or to continue to act, as a McKenzie friend, and whether to grant them rights of audience. Cases where McKenzie friends have been prohibited from further involvement in proceedings include Re Baggaley, where a civil restraint order was made, and M v F, where the McKenzie friend was considered to be ‘affecting the efficient administration of justice’.

References:

Practice Guidance: McKenzie Friends (Civil and Family Courts) [2010] 2 FLR 962

Re Baggaley [2015] EWHC 1496 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 149 (Jun)

M v F [2017] Lexis Citation 138

The Law Society has also issued a practice note on meeting the needs of vulnerable clients that may be of assistance in cases where the capacity of a party may be in issue.

 

Litigant in person without assistance

The court should actively assist in clarifying the case that the litigant in person wishes to put and, if necessary, help them to some extent to put their case. For example:

  • advise the litigant in person to seek legal advice—especially if the possible order is very serious, as any care order is, but especially one where adoption could be the preferred outcome, and also if the court is considering (rare, in care proceedings) committal proceedings against the litigant
  • allow the litigant in person some latitude in the preparation and presentation of their case
  • allow extra time to prepare, and perhaps give access to reference books
  • ask questions of witnesses that the litigant should have asked

But the court must not go so far that it risks infringing the art 6 rights of another party.

References:

Re R (a child) (residence order: treatment of child’s wishes) [2009] EWCA Civ 445, [2010] 1 FLR 509

There remains a problem if the litigant in person wishes to cross-examine a child witness who has made accusations of sexual abuse. The statutory restrictions on this in the criminal courts have not been extended to family proceedings — in one case, the Attorney General exceptionally provided an advocate. In Q v Q the issue of lack of public funding (in a private children case where the father was a convicted sex offender) was highlighted by the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby. The Ministry of Justice has taken a robust approach however to judicial attempts to direct funding costs to it, successfully appealing the decision in Re K and H (Children: unrepresented father: cross-examination of child) in which it was ordered that Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service should fund the cost of an advocate to cross-examine a child witness in a private law case, where the (non-subject) child had alleged she had been sexually abused (see Re K and H (Children)).

References:

H v L [2006] EWHC 3099 (Fam), [2007] 2 FLR 162

Re R (a child) (residence order: treatment of child’s wishes) [2009] EWCA Civ 445, [2010] 1 FLR 509

Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31, [2014] All ER (D) 40 (Aug)

Re K and H (Children: unrepresented father: cross-examination of child) [2015] EWFC 1,[2015] All ER (D) 23 (Jan)

Re K and H (Children) [2015] EWCA Civ 543, [2015] All ER (D) 230 (May)

In Re A (a minor) (fact finding; unrepresented party), Hayden J took up the point (at para [60]), saying:

References:

Re A (a minor) (fact finding; unrepresented party) [2017] EWHC 1195 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 49 (Jun)

‘It is a stain on the reputation of our family justice system that a judge can still not prevent a victim being cross examined by an alleged perpetrator. This may not have been the worst or most extreme example but it serves only to underscore that the process is inherently and profoundly unfair. I would go further it is, in itself, abusive. For my part, I am simply not prepared to hear a case in this way again. I cannot regard it as consistent with my judicial oath and my responsibility to ensure fairness between the parties.’

Note however that a new FPR 2010, Pt 3A is in force from 27 November 2017 by virtue of the Family Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2017, SI 2017/1033, together with a new practice direction (PD 3AA), making special provision as to the participation of, and giving of evidence by, vulnerable persons in family proceedings. The new provisions require the court to consider whether a party’s or witness’s quality of evidence may be diminished as a result of vulnerability, and whether it is necessary to make participation directions, including provision for a party or witness to be questioned in court with the assistance of an intermediary. See also News Analysis: Amendments to the Family Procedure Rules 2010 regarding vulnerable parties.

In Re B (Family Proceedings) (Litigants in Person: Timely Service of Documents), Peter Jackson J set out said that the court should normally direct that practice direction documents (as specified in FPR 2010, PD 27A, para 6.1, supplementing FPR 2010, Pt 27) be served on a litigant in person at least three days before the final hearing, especially where the litigant in person is not fluent in English. The method of service, usually email, should be specified. If there is time, the court should consider directing that the key documents are to be served with a translation. In cases where late service on a litigant in person might cause genuine unfairness, the court should consider whether an adjournment of the hearing should be allowed until the position has been corrected. The need for earlier preparation and service places obligations on advocates and those who instruct them, but is necessary to prevent intrinsic unfairness to litigants in person that may arise from late service.

References:

Re B (Family Proceedings) (Litigants in Person: Timely Service of Documents) [2016] EWHC 2365 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 70 (Oct)

FPR 2010, SI 2010/2955, Pt 27

FPR 2010, PD 27A, para 6.1

On an appeal by a litigant in person within care proceedings, the local authority is expected to help the court by ensuring appeal bundles are provided, including where necessary by the provision of alternative or supplementary bundles.

References:

Re R (a child) (care proceedings: welfare evaluation) [2014] EWCA Civ 597, [2014] All ER (D) 87 (May)

 

Litigant in person assisted by McKenzie friend

In Re O (children), Re W-R (a child), Re W (children) the Court of Appeal considered the circumstances in which a litigant in person may seek assistance from a McKenzie friend in relation to family proceedings held in private and said, inter alia, that:

References:

Re O (children), Re W-R (a child), Re W (children) [2005] EWCA Civ 759, [2005] 2 FLR 967

  • the concept of a Mckenzie friend has evolved and pre-Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) judgments on the subject are not always apt
  • the purpose of allowing a litigant in person to have the assistance of a McKenzie friend is to further the interests of justice by achieving a level playing field, and there is a strong presumption in favour of allowing a litigant in person to have such assistance
  • if the judge rules adversely on such an application, they must explain their reasons for doing so carefully and fully to both the litigant-in-person and the proposed McKenzie friend
  • the sooner the issue is resolved, the better, to give continuity within the proceedings—it is good practice for the proposed McKenzie friend to be present at the time of the application, to assist in it being made and so that they fully understand the role they are to play and the confidentiality attaching to documents, and
  • it is helpful for the proposed McKenzie friend to produce a short CV/statement, declaring they have no personal interest in the case and understand their role and the rules regarding confidentiality

In Re N (a child) (McKenzie friend: rights of audience), Munby J (as he then was) addressed the circumstances in which the court may grant rights of audience to a McKenzie friend, as opposed to that person merely helping the litigant-in-person, saying that:

References:

Re N (a child) (McKenzie friend: rights of audience) [2008] EWHC 2042 (Fam), [2008] 2 FLR 1899

  • there must be good reason for such rights to be granted, in line with the general objective and principle of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (now repealed in part by the Legal Services Act 2007), and the court should be very slow to allow such an application
  • there do not have to be exceptional circumstances, however, and legislation confers an unfettered discretion
  • there is a spectrum, and each case is fact-specific—at one end is the person setting themselves up as a ‘professional’ McKenzie friend, and an unqualified advocate, whether or not for reward, and only in exceptional circumstances will the court allow that—at the other end of the spectrum may be the spouse or partner of the litigant, although again circumstances may vary greatly, and
  • the overriding objective is that the courts should do justice, and there will be increasing numbers of litigants-in-person with the cuts in legal aid—in some cases, the grant of rights of audience will help the court to ensure a fair hearing, and sometimes it will be ‘essential if justice is to be done and, equally importantly, perceived by the litigant in person as having been done’.

This article was originally published in LexisPSL Local Government. If you would like to read more quality content like this, then register for a free 1 week trial of LexisPSL.

More content from LexisNexis

December 02, 2021

Empty white space in a data hall operated by an IT company forms part of a rateable hereditament

LexisPSL analyse a case in which empty white space in a data hall operated by an IT company forms part of a rateable hereditament
November 26, 2021

Costs order made against an intermediary (A local authority v Mother)

LexisPSL conduct a Family analysis on a case in which a Costs order was made against an intermediary (A local authority v Mother).
November 25, 2021

Court finds no duty to take past housing oversupply into account in assessing five-year target

LexisPSL conduct a planning analysis on the Tewkesbury BC v SSHCLG case, in which the court dismissed a challenge to an inspector’s decision to grant planning permission for a housing development.
November 19, 2021

Infrastructure planning - an error of law in the process of determining applications did not justify a quashing of the decisions

Joseph Cannon analyses the EFW Group Ltd v SSBEIS case, in which an error of law in the process of determining applications did not justify a quashing of the decisions.
November 12, 2021

Faith school legitimate expectation and discrimination challenges dismissed

Adam Heppinstall QC and Jack Castle explore a case in which the court dismissed legitimate expectations, discrimination and irrationality challenges against the decision to move a Sikh-faith Academy to another Trust.
November 04, 2021

Issuing and serving the claim form

Rebecca Lawrence considers the pitfalls and potential relief in procurement challenges and beyond (CitySprint UK v Barts Health NHS Trust).
November 01, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - Effectively tackling ASB

Join expert Housing barrister, Kuljit Bhogal and Susan Taylor, Senior Solicitor at Capsticks as they outline the latest thinking for social landlords on effectively tackling ASB.
October 15, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - the Liberty Protection Safeguards

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Alex Ruck-Keene and Emma Harrison look at how the new Liberty Protection Safeguards will work in practice when they replace the Deprivations of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS) next year.
October 14, 2021

Who examines the examiners?

Graeme Watson of Clyde & Co LLP considers the role of case examiners for the General Medical Council and the extent to which their decisions are open to challenge by disappointed patients.
October 07, 2021

Unregulated placements for children under 16

Can the High Court to still authorise, under its inherent jurisdiction, the deprivation of liberty of a child under the age of 16 following amendments to the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010? Tahmina Rahman, barrister at 1GC Family Law, considers the issues.
September 30, 2021

Social care reforms in England - how will they work in practice?

Nicola Gunn of Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP, in association with Lexis PSL, considers what the reforms will mean in practice for those who require care.
September 24, 2021

The recovery of tuition fees

Imogen Proud analyses the decision of the High Court in SS Education v CCP Graduate School Ltd to deny the recovery of tuition fees under the Education (Student Support) Regulations 2011.
September 17, 2021

Local Government - new starter guide

The following LexisNexis practice note is aimed at trainee solicitors and those who are new to Local Government and explains the role of local government lawyers and provides an overview of the primary legal disciplines they will encounter.
September 07, 2021

Homelessness and eligibility

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note, produced in partnership with Iris Ferber of 42 Bedford Row, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the eligibility of applicants for housing assistance.
September 03, 2021

What is climate change litigation?

The following LexisNexis Environment practice note produced in partnership with Katharina Theil of Leigh Day and Richard Lord QC of Brick Court Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on the rise of climate change related litigation.
August 27, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - Local Authority Duties in Intercountry Adoption

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Ruth Cabeza, barrister and author of the text, International Adoption, from Harcourt Chambers and Joy Hopkinson, Principal Social Care Lawyer from London Borough of Lambeth, discuss the issues for local authorities dealing with overseas placements both in a private and public law context.
August 26, 2021

Gambling law: at-a-glance guide

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Carl Rohsler of Memery Crystal provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the legal issues most pertinent to the gambling industry.
August 19, 2021

Delivering 21st-century customer experience in the public sector

Rachel Buchanan examines how legal teams should support their authorities in delivering tailored services at a time of restrained resources.
August 05, 2021

The Public Law Outline 2014

The following Family practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the operation of the Public Law Outline 2014 during the Covid-19 Pandemic.
July 29, 2021

IR35 and off-payroll workers

The following LexisNexis Tax practice note, produced in partnership with David Smith of DLA Piper, explains the IR35 regime which applies where either a public authority or a private sector entity engages a worker via an intermediary.
July 22, 2021

Food advertising

This LexisNexis Practice Note, produced in partnership with Katrina Anderson of Osborne Clarke, considers the law and practice applicable to food advertising to consumers.
July 15, 2021

CQC enforcement tracker

This Practice Note from LexisNexis provides a summary of key prosecutions for health and social care offences brought by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England since 2015. This tracker is intended to assist practitioners in monitoring the type of sentences which are being imposed for breaches of health and social care legislation.
July 09, 2021

Good faith in commercial agreements

The following Commercial practice note from LexisNexis examines the concept of good faith and the extent to which it is applied in commercial agreements.
June 28, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - Climate Change

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: What are the legal powers that local authorities can use to fight climate change and what legal obstacles do they face? Rachel McKoy, Stephen Cirell, Richard Honey QC and James Lupton consider the problems.
June 18, 2021

Possession - anti-social behaviour, nuisance and crime

This Local Government practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the options available to social housing landlords when taking possession proceedings against tenants engaged in anti-social behaviour.
June 11, 2021

Unlawful eviction and quiet enjoyment

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Laura Tweedy of Hardwicke Chambers explains what unlawful eviction is, how and when it may arise from a civil and criminal perspective, the civil remedies available and potential consequential causes of action, in particular a breach of a tenant’s right to quiet enjoyment.
June 04, 2021

Anti-social behaviour - powers to control behaviour

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Hardwicke Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the powers available under The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
May 28, 2021

Introduction to public contracts procurement

The following LexisNexis Local Government practice note, produced in partnership with Katherine Calder of DAC Beachcroft, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information providing an introduction to public contracts procurement.
May 21, 2021

Housing disrepair for local authority landlords - a practical guide

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note, produced in partnership with Alexander Bastin of Hardwicke Chambers, discusses disrepair claims in relation to social housing, setting out the legal basis for a claim and other the relevant factors that need to be considered.
April 16, 2021

Education tracker

This Local Government practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering key upcoming developments of interest to Education lawyers from early years foundation stage (EFYS) to further and higher education.
April 09, 2021

Vulnerable persons - participation and evidence in family proceedings

The following Family practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the participation of vulnerable people and evidence in family proceedings.
March 31, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - implications for property

The following Property practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the implications for landlords of the Covid-19 pandemic.
March 19, 2021

Brexit - key legislation explained

The following Public Law practice note produced in partnership with Dr. Kieran Laird of Gowling WLG provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the key legislation governing Brexit.
March 12, 2021

Transparency in the family courts

Ths following Family practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering recent developments in the transparency of family court proceedings.
March 05, 2021

Use of confidential information in civil proceedings

This Dispute Resolution Practice Note from LexisNexis looks at the status and use of confidential information in civil proceedings including what confidential information is, how to protect confidential information and how confidentiality may be lost.
February 18, 2021

Brexit Timeline Tracker

This Practice Note sets out a timeline of key events and updates in the post-transition period, focussing in particular on the implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement and associated agreements.
February 11, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Children’s Social Care Tracker

This tracker is focused on children’s social care and is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to coronavirus (COVID-19) and children’s social care, where relevant to local government lawyers.
February 05, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Healthcare Tracker

This tracker is focused on healthcare and is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to coronavirus (COVID-19) and healthcare.
January 29, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Governance Tracker

This tracker from LexisNexis Local Government intended to be used to track the most recent key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to coronavirus (COVID-19) local authority governance, where relevant to local government lawyers.
January 21, 2021

Data protection under the EU GDPR

The following Information Law precedent from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering data protection after the final withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union.
January 14, 2021

Commencing criminal proceedings - applying for the issue of a summons

The following Corporate Crime practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the correct procedure for bring a criminal prosecution.
December 18, 2020

Education tracker

This Lexis®PSL Local Government future developments tracker is intended to be used to track key upcoming developments of interest to education lawyers covering the entire spectrum of education from early years foundation stage (EFYS) to further and higher education.
December 11, 2020

Termination for breach of contract

The following LexisNexis Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the identification and the process and implications of ending a contract due to breach.
December 03, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) – implications for property

The following Property practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the implications for commercial and residential property of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
November 27, 2020

Local Government Brexit tracker

This tracker is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to Brexit relevant to local government lawyers. It is arranged alphabetically by topic and is designed to provide an easy reference point for relevant content for lawyers to support preparation for and implementation of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.
November 20, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Managing the Workplace

The following LexisNexis Employment practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the management of workplaces during the Coronavirus pandemic.
October 22, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Social Care Tracker

This LexisNexis tracker is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to COVID-19, where relevant to social care lawyers.
October 16, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - local government tracker

This LexisNexis tracker is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to COVID-19, where relevant to local government lawyers.
October 09, 2020

The Planning White Paper

LexisNexis looks at the government's proposals for a ‘whole new planning system for England’ in White Paper published for consultation, alongside interim reforms.
October 02, 2020

The Public Sector Equality Duty

The following LexisNexis Public Law guidance note, produced in partnership with Zoe Bedford of Ellis Whittam, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the scope of the Public Sector Equality Duty.
September 25, 2020

Housing disrepair for local authority landlords - a practical guide

The following LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Alexander Bastin of Hardwicke, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information for local authorities covering all aspects of dealing with disrepair issues.
September 17, 2020

Employment law and Covid-19

This Employment guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering employment law issues arising from the Covid-19 pandemic.
September 11, 2020

Introduction to Public Contracts Procurement

The following LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Walker Morris, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering public contracts procurement, including the impact of Brexit.
September 04, 2020

Guide to Care Act 2014 repeals

The following LexisNexis Private Client guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering repealed legislation (in whole or in part), secondary legislation revoked (in whole or in part), relevant new secondary legislation and statutory guidance and directions cancelled.
August 21, 2020

Obtaining possession of a secure tenancy

The following LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Karl King of Hardwicke Chambers, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the grounds on which and steps required to obtain possession of a secure tenancy.
August 14, 2020

Obstruction of highways

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Nicholas Hancox Solicitors, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering a wide variety of circumstances in which public highways may be obstructed and what measures are available to councils to deal with them.
August 07, 2020

LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index: Quantifying legal demand growth and the impact of COVID-19

LexisNexis has built a data model to track growth in demand for legal services – the Gross Legal Product Index, or GLP. The report provides a framework for quantifying the impact of COVID-19 on your sector.
July 31, 2020

COVID-19: What’s worrying lawyers?

Elizabeth Rimmer of LawCare examines some of the issues encountered by lawyers when working remotely during the pandemic.
June 19, 2020

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) - practice and procedure

This Property Disputes guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the jurisdiction, practice and procedure of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
June 12, 2020

Quick guide to landlord’s remedies for breach of lease

The following property disputes guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information for commercial landlords.
June 05, 2020

The Public Law Outline 2014

This Practice Note provides practical guidance on key aspects of procedure and the PLO 2014 for public children proceedings.
May 07, 2020

Anti-social behaviour - powers to control behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Hardwicke Chambers, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the powers available to control behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
May 01, 2020

Anti-social behaviour - powers to close premises under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This Local Government guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information outlining the powers available to local authorities to close premises where anti-social behaviour is taking place.
Coronavirus Hand sanitizer 146x219
April 24, 2020

Coronavirus – What’s the impact on the legal profession?

With Coronavirus dominating the news and the majority of Europe now entering different stages of lockdown due to the rise in uncertainties about the virus, LexisNexis has rounded up its latest articles discussing the pandemic.
Human Rights 96780326 s 146x219
April 23, 2020

Why is advancing the rule of law so important?

Have you ever considered your human rights? The Universal Declaration of Human Rights outlines our various rights under the law, the most basic being: “We are all equal before the law."But, is this really the case?
April 16, 2020

Employment law and Covid-19

This following employment guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on employment law changes caused by the Covid-19 outbreak.
Roadworks 54101373 s 146x219
February 28, 2020

Road traffic – order procedure notices

This Local Government guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering road traffic orders, regulations, procedures and the powers available to local authorities.
Housing Rogue Landlord 99725772 s 146x219
February 13, 2020

Obtaining possession of a secure tenancy

Produced in partnership with Karl King of Hardwicke Chambers, this LexisNexis Local Government guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the range of tenancy types for social housing and the processes involved in obtaining possession for each.
February 06, 2020

Local authority social care duties

The following Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Ros Ashcroft of DAC Beachcroft and Stephanie Townley of Addleshaw Goddard LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering local authority duties towards social care.
January 31, 2020

Houses in multiple occupation

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the management, licensing and definition of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs).
December 13, 2019

Granting assured and assured shorthold tenancies

This practice note from LexisNexis explains the criteria for assured tenancies (AT) and assured shorthold tenancies (AST) and the exceptions to those criteria, the main terms of AT and ASTs, the position regarding succession, and summarises a landlord’s obligations in respect of energy efficiency, gas safety and other health and safety obligations, right to rent and tenancy deposits.
December 05, 2019

Assignment and succession of tenancy

Morayo Fagborun Bennett looks at the circumstances in which social housing tenancies can be transferred to another tenant.
November 29, 2019

Powers to control anti-social behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This guidance note provides a comprehensive and up to date overview of powers to control anti-social behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, Reform of anti-social behaviour powers (2014), Part 1 Civil Injunctions and Part 2 Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO).
Missiles 91309216 s. 146x219
October 11, 2019

Exploring the court’s power to block sale of arms to Saudi Arabia

Sue Willman, senior partner at Deighton Pierce Glynn, analyses the case of R (on the application of Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Secretary of State for International Trade (Amnesty International and others intervening) and its implications for UK arms trade.
Airport travel 3160566 640
October 11, 2019

Court rejects challenges to Heathrow expansion

Charles Streeten, barrister at Francis Taylor Building, explains how the court came to reject the claims for judicial review of the Heathrow runway expansion in R (on the application of Spurrier) v Secretary of State for Transport and other cases.
Housing family 96709182 s
October 04, 2019

Exploring the limits of public authority’s liability for children

Duncan Fairgrieve and Jim Duffy, barristers at 1 Crown Office Row, examine the Supreme Court’s decision in Poole Borough Council v GN and another that the respondent local authority did not owe a common law duty of care to exercise its functions under the Children Act 1989 to protect the appellants, who were children of a family which it had housed, from harm at the hands of anti-social neighbours.
Dead end road 32516564 s 146x219
October 04, 2019

Abandoning a procurement exercise - when can a contracting authority extinguish a challenge?

Lucy James looks at the legal effect of a decision to abandon a procurement exercise and whether it extinguishes an accrued cause of action a bidder may have against a contracting authority for breaches of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 SI 2015/102 (PCR 2015).
Education cuts 93374247 s 146x219
August 23, 2019

‘Funding crisis’ - a detailed look at the funding shortage in UK schools

According to campaigners, more than 200 schools in England are cutting their school weeks short due to funding shortages. This raises questions over legal ramifications and the responsibility of the government. Jean Tsang, associate at Bates Wells and governor of a maintained primary school, addresses these questions and looks at the worrying effects of this ‘funding crisis’ on the ‘most vulnerable children’ in the educational system.
Cost cutting 21525611 s 146x219
August 16, 2019

Judicial review challenge over closure of children’s centres defeated by local authority

The case R (on the application of L, an infant (by his mother and litigation friend)) v Buckinghamshire County Council represents the first time when the High Court considered in detail the meaning of the ‘sufficiency duty’ in section 5A of the Childcare Act 2006 (ChA 2006) in the context of whether a council’s consultation on the closure of a number of children’s centres was unlawful or not. James Goudie QC examines the background to and the practical implications of the judgment.
Market 25240022 s 146x219
August 09, 2019

How does a local authority establish a market?

The LexisPSL team outline the powers available to local authorities looking to establish a new market.
School gate iStock 000003257894XSmall 146x219
August 02, 2019

Forced academisation of schools - is resistance futile?

What are the circumstances which lead to a school being forced to become an academy, and is there anything that can be done to stop it happening? Katie Michelon provides an overview of the forced academisation process, and explains the options available to schools, parents and local authorities when faced with the possibility of an Academy Order.
Plane passenger plane 19469 640 pixabay
June 13, 2019

Home or away?

Katherine Illsley outlines how a local authority should approach the situation where a parent to be assessed for the purposes of public children care lives in another jurisdiction.
House key iStock 000004543619XSmall 146x219
June 07, 2019

Tenant Fees Act 2019 - government guidance

The government recently published guidance on the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (TFA 2019). Robin Stewart and David Smith of Anthony Gold Solicitors look at some of the key questions relating to the guidance, including enforcement, penalties and some controversial aspects such as guidance pertaining to payment of damages.
Choice 33452110 s 146x219
June 07, 2019

How should the courts approach cases with an ‘open’ pool of possible perpetrators?

Chris Stevenson, barrister at Fourteen, examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Re B (children: uncertain perpetrator) to allow a father’s appeal against a Family Court judge’s finding that he was within a pool of possible perpetrators responsible for sexually transmitting gonorrhoea to three of his children (registration required).
Planning 146x219
May 24, 2019

Court of Appeal finds permissive housing policies can restrict development elsewhere

In Gladman Developments Ltd v Canterbury City Council [2019] EWCA Civ 669, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by developer Gladman against the decision of the High Court to quash planning permission granted on appeal for a residential development on a site not allocated for development, not on previously developed land, and outside the existing built-up area.
Child safety gate 36045624 s 146x219
May 24, 2019

Safety first?

Daljit Kaur looks at the implications for disability discrimination of a case concerning a nursery-age child prevented from accessing provision over 15 hours.
UK map 66823434 s 146x219
May 17, 2019

The changing landscape of local authority Trading Standards prosecutions?

Richard Heller considers the potential impact of Qualter and others v Crown Court at Preston [2019] EWHC 906 (Admin) could have on the way regional Trading Standards services investigate and prosecute criminal offences (registration required).
Child removal iStock 000007583512XSmall 146x219
May 17, 2019

Wish they weren't here?

Can a parent with parental responsibility object to their child, who is subject to an interim care order, being taken on holiday by their foster parents?
Housing Rogue Landlord 99725772 s 146x219
May 10, 2019

Exploring the new guidance on greater protections from rogue landlords

Jason Hobday, associate at Womble Bond Dickinson, discusses the implications of recent government guidance documents which intend to enforce greater protections from rogue landlords (registration required).
Bias iStock 000008329150XSmall 146x219
May 09, 2019

Court finds judge in Uber licensing case was not biased

Philip Kolvin QC examines the High Court’s decision in R (United Cabbies Group) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court to dismiss the claimant’s application for judicial review of a district judge’s grant of an operator’s licence for London private hire vehicles to the third interested party, Uber.
Housing timer 45568205 s 146x219
May 03, 2019

End of the road?

Morayo Fagborun Bennett looks at the Court of Appeal's decision on waiving offers of alternative accommodation and the lawfulness of an earlier review decision on a subsequent homelessness appplication in Godson v London Borough of Enfield [2019] EWCA Civ 486.
Council Tax 89947548 s 146x219
May 03, 2019

Court rejects implied duty to report change of address for council tax purposes (R v D)

Samuel Genen, solicitor at Steel & Shamash, comments on the case of R v D [2019] EWCA Crim 209 where the Court of Appeal ruled that a failure to notify the local council of a change of address for the purpose of council tax did not constitute a criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006). (Registration required)
Evidence in Foreign Courts 71283762 s 146x219
March 22, 2019

Is it in the best interests of a child to give evidence in a foreign trial?

Katherine Duncan explains how the court, in Re X, carried out a balancing exercise in determining whether a child, who was ward of the court, should be permitted to travel out of the jurisdiction to give evidence at a foreign criminal trial.
High Courts inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults 95112860 s 146x219
March 15, 2019

High Court’s inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults

The case of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council v Meyers [2019] EWHC 399 (Fam) highlights the wide and largely unfettered nature of the power to grant injunctive relief under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults and the difficulty surrounding the issue of how the balance should be struck between protection of a person on grounds of vulnerability and respect for their autonomy, writes Bethan Harris.