This page draws together a monthly selection of articles and features supplied by LexisNexis for publication on Local Government Lawyer and Public Law Today. We also showcase other publications and resources that LexisNexis produces to support lawyers working in the public sector. To see all articles, please click here.
Slide background

Employment of local authority officers

Council chamber1LexisPSL Local Government, in partnership with Philip McCourt, provides a summary of the local government legal peculiarities involved in the appointment or dismissal of officers.

Discussion of employment issues in local government fall into three areas:

  • normal employment law issues, such as those concerning discrimination, fair or unfair dismissal (including redundancy), TUPE etc
  • contractual requirements, which will require consultation with national conditions of service except where local agreements have been made. In this scenario those will fall into one of three categories, being:

- Joint Negotiating Committee (JNC) terms for chief executives and chief officers

- other managers and staff under the single status (green book) conditions; and

- occupation specific conditions of service, such as those for teachers or firefighters

  • those laws that are specific to local authorities concerning the appointment of staff and those more generally concerning decision-making as a local authority that impact on those decisions. These are contained in several sources but principally as part of mandatory standing orders, commonly referred to as an authority's employment procedure rules

The appointment of officers

The council is empowered to appoint such officers as it thinks necessary for the proper discharge by the authority of such of their or another authority’s functions as falls or is agreed to be discharged by them.

Local Government Act 1972, s 112

Every appointment of a person to a paid office or employment by the council is to be made on merit.

Local Government and Housing Act 1989, s 7

There are then regulations establishing various mandatory standing orders (procedure rules) giving effect to obligations or restrictions on delegation of authority to bring these principles into effect. These rules should be set out within a council’s constitution.

Local Authorities (Standing Orders) Regulation 1993, SI 1993/202

Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/3384

Statutory chief officers, chief officers, deputy chief officers and other officers

Local government employment rules differentiate between categories of officers. These include statutory chief officers, chief officers, deputy chief officers and other officers.

For example, (whilst it is commonplace for all posts) it is only a legal requirement for the appointment of chief officers or deputy chief officers to be subject to a role description and person specification and, where the appointment is not an internal process, that it must be subject to appropriate advertisement.

The statutory chief officers are the:

These are officers that the authority must have in place, some of which may be combined and some of which cannot, but they all have additional personal responsibilities. Added to this list might be the returning officer and electoral registration officer.

SI 2001/3384, reg 6

There are a number of other statutory officer roles that a local authority must have in place, such as a scrutiny officer, and in Wales, the democratic services officer, but these are not chief officer posts in their own right.

Local Government Act 2000, s 9FB

Local Government Act (Wales) Measure 2011 (Commencement No 3) Order 2014, SI 2014/453, s 8

A ‘non-statutory chief officer’ is defined as:

  • a person for whom the head of the authority's paid service is directly responsible
  • a person who, as respects all or most of the duties of their post, is required to report directly or is directly accountable to the head of the authority's paid service; and
  • any person who, as respects all or most of the duties of their post, is required to report directly or is directly accountable to the local authority themselves or any committee or sub-committee of the authority; but

excludes any person whose duties are solely secretarial or clerical or are otherwise in the nature of support services.

A ‘deputy chief officer’ is defined as a person who, as respects all or most of the duties of their post, is required to report directly or is directly accountable to one or more of the statutory or non-statutory chief officers. This definition is subject to the same exclusion concerning administrative and support staff.

Local Government and Housing Act 1989, s 2

Localism Act 2011, s 43(2)

These posts are subject to redundancy. A chief officer (or deputy chief officer if on JNC contracts) should be afforded the opportunity to make oral representations to the committee before the decision on redundancy is taken.

What are known as the governance statutory chief officers, the first three listed above being the head of paid service, the chief finance or s 151 officer and the monitoring officer, have (in England) additional statutory employment protection due to the nature of their role in having to ‘speak truth unto power’, which is not always welcome. These statutory provisions are adopted by authorities as mandatory standing orders but are also contractually reflected in the JNC conditions of service. The nature of that employment protection changed in 2015 with the Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/881, moving the involvement of an independent third-party in any proposed disciplinary investigation from the beginning of the process to the end. That was felt by many authorities to be a potentially expensive and retrograde step, failing to address the object of the mischief to be addressed in the LGHA 1989 and the Widdecombe Report. As a result, many authorities have adopted the amended mandatory standing orders but, as the previous and amending standing orders are not mutually exclusive, have also kept the previous provisions in their standing orders (employment procedure rules) and in those officers’ contracts.

Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/3384 as amended by the Local Authorities (Standing Orders) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/881

Who makes the decision?

Where executive arrangements are in place, the appointment of staff, including their dismissal and the terms and conditions upon which they are appointed, is a function reserved to the Council. This means that these decisions are either taken by the Council itself, a Committee or an officer, although there are a number of exceptions to this introduced by the standing orders referred to above. The result of this is the following rules as outlined below.

Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000, SI 2000/2853, Sch 1, para 37

LGA 1972, s 101

Role of members

All appointments and dismissals in respect of staff positions that are not chief officers or deputy chief officers is the responsibility of the head of paid service (the chief executive). Members are not permitted to be involved in these decisions, except insofar as there are arrangements for an appeals committee for staff matters.

The appointment or dismissal of the head of paid service may only be made by a meeting of the full council, which may either be direct or as confirmation of a recommendation from a committee or sub-committee of council.

SI 2001/3384, Sch 1, para 4

Delegated authority may therefore be granted by council to a committee or sub-committee or to the head of paid service, in respect of all other chief officers and deputy chief officers. Again, this may be authority to discharge the full function of making or confirming appointment, or dismissal, or be limited to making a recommendation to a full meeting of the council.

The designation of the posts associated with the statutory chief officers, especially the head of paid service, monitoring officer and chief finance officer, are usually set out in the council’s constitution as part of standing orders (commonly referred to as employment procedure rules). Unlike the head of paid service, there is no statutory requirement for the full authority to approve appointment or dismissal to statutory posts, but this is common practice in respect of the monitoring officer and chief finance officer posts across many authorities and is likely to also be a requirement in those councils’ constitutions.

Involvement of leader or elected mayor and cabinet under executive arrangements

Where an elected mayor or leader and cabinet executive arrangements are in place, they will be involved in the decisions to appoint or dismiss a chief officer and deputy chief officer in two distinct ways.

  • where a committee or a sub-committee of the council is discharging, on behalf of the authority, the function of appointment or dismissal, at least one member of the cabinet must be a member of that committee or sub-committee
  • before an offer of appointment or notice of dismissal is issued, the members of the cabinet must be informed of the prospective decision and the elected mayor/leader may make representations concerning their 'material and well founded' objection to the decision maker

SI 2001/3384, Sch 1, Pts I, II, paras 5, 6

The particular role and involvement of the Chief Executive (head of paid service)

The role of the chief executive in this process is threefold as they have to undertake distinct roles as head of paid service (HoPS). The HoPS:

  • has the role of decision maker in posts below deputy chief officer (and as the responsible officer concerning the grant and supervision of exemptions from political restriction) (LGHA 1989, s 3 as amended by the Localism Act 2011)
  • is considered to be the principal advisor on staffing matters to the council and therefore the appropriate committee or a sub-committee (except for where there would be a conflict of interest in respect of her own pay and conditions of service)
  • has a responsibility to consider whether they should issue a formal HoPS report. The ‘section 4’ report informs the council of their proposals concerning:

- the manner in which the discharge by the authority of their different functions is co-ordinated

- the number and grades of staff required by the authority for the discharge of their functions

- the organisation of the authority's staff; and

- the appointment and proper management of the authority's staff

The full council is then required to consider those proposals. In effect however this formal power is seldom used, if ever, but is a blueprint for restructuring reports and the responsibilities of those involved.

LGHA 1989, s 4

Related issues that are not distinct to local authorities or employment matters have not been referred to in this article.

This article, written in partnership with Philip McCourt was originally published in LexisPSL Local Government. If you would like to read more quality content like this, then register for a free 1 week trial of LexisPSL.

More content from LexisNexis

August 07, 2020

LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index: Quantifying legal demand growth and the impact of COVID-19

LexisNexis has built a data model to track growth in demand for legal services – the Gross Legal Product Index, or GLP. The report provides a framework for quantifying the impact of COVID-19 on your sector.
July 31, 2020

COVID-19: What’s worrying lawyers?

Elizabeth Rimmer of LawCare examines some of the issues encountered by lawyers when working remotely during the pandemic.
June 19, 2020

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) - practice and procedure

This Property Disputes guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the jurisdiction, practice and procedure of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
June 12, 2020

Quick guide to landlord’s remedies for breach of lease

The following property disputes guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information for commercial landlords.
June 05, 2020

The Public Law Outline 2014

This Practice Note provides practical guidance on key aspects of procedure and the PLO 2014 for public children proceedings.
May 07, 2020

Anti-social behaviour - powers to control behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Hardwicke Chambers, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the powers available to control behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
May 01, 2020

Anti-social behaviour - powers to close premises under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This Local Government guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information outlining the powers available to local authorities to close premises where anti-social behaviour is taking place.
Coronavirus Hand sanitizer 146x219
April 24, 2020

Coronavirus – What’s the impact on the legal profession?

With Coronavirus dominating the news and the majority of Europe now entering different stages of lockdown due to the rise in uncertainties about the virus, LexisNexis has rounded up its latest articles discussing the pandemic.
Human Rights 96780326 s 146x219
April 23, 2020

Why is advancing the rule of law so important?

Have you ever considered your human rights? The Universal Declaration of Human Rights outlines our various rights under the law, the most basic being: “We are all equal before the law."But, is this really the case?
April 16, 2020

Employment law and Covid-19

This following employment guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on employment law changes caused by the Covid-19 outbreak.
Roadworks 54101373 s 146x219
February 28, 2020

Road traffic – order procedure notices

This Local Government guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering road traffic orders, regulations, procedures and the powers available to local authorities.
Housing Rogue Landlord 99725772 s 146x219
February 13, 2020

Obtaining possession of a secure tenancy

Produced in partnership with Karl King of Hardwicke Chambers, this LexisNexis Local Government guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the range of tenancy types for social housing and the processes involved in obtaining posession for each.
February 06, 2020

Local authority social care duties

The following Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Ros Ashcroft of DAC Beachcroft and Stephanie Townley of Addleshaw Goddard LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering local authority duties towards social care.
January 31, 2020

Houses in multiple occupation

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the management, licensing and definition of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs).
December 13, 2019

Granting assured and assured shorthold tenancies

This practice note from LexisNexis explains the criteria for assured tenancies (AT) and assured shorthold tenancies (AST) and the exceptions to those criteria, the main terms of AT and ASTs, the position regarding succession, and summarises a landlord’s obligations in respect of energy efficiency, gas safety and other health and safety obligations, right to rent and tenancy deposits.
December 05, 2019

Assignment and succession of tenancy

Morayo Fagborun Bennett looks at the circumstances in which social housing tenancies can be transferred to another tenant.
November 29, 2019

Powers to control anti-social behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This guidance note provides a comprehensive and up to date overview of powers to control anti-social behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, Reform of anti-social behaviour powers (2014), Part 1 Civil Injunctions and Part 2 Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO).
Missiles 91309216 s. 146x219
October 11, 2019

Exploring the court’s power to block sale of arms to Saudi Arabia

Sue Willman, senior partner at Deighton Pierce Glynn, analyses the case of R (on the application of Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Secretary of State for International Trade (Amnesty International and others intervening) and its implications for UK arms trade.
Airport travel 3160566 640
October 11, 2019

Court rejects challenges to Heathrow expansion

Charles Streeten, barrister at Francis Taylor Building, explains how the court came to reject the claims for judicial review of the Heathrow runway expansion in R (on the application of Spurrier) v Secretary of State for Transport and other cases.
Housing family 96709182 s
October 04, 2019

Exploring the limits of public authority’s liability for children

Duncan Fairgrieve and Jim Duffy, barristers at 1 Crown Office Row, examine the Supreme Court’s decision in Poole Borough Council v GN and another that the respondent local authority did not owe a common law duty of care to exercise its functions under the Children Act 1989 to protect the appellants, who were children of a family which it had housed, from harm at the hands of anti-social neighbours.
Dead end road 32516564 s 146x219
October 04, 2019

Abandoning a procurement exercise - when can a contracting authority extinguish a challenge?

Lucy James looks at the legal effect of a decision to abandon a procurement exercise and whether it extinguishes an accrued cause of action a bidder may have against a contracting authority for breaches of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 SI 2015/102 (PCR 2015).
Education cuts 93374247 s 146x219
August 23, 2019

‘Funding crisis’ - a detailed look at the funding shortage in UK schools

According to campaigners, more than 200 schools in England are cutting their school weeks short due to funding shortages. This raises questions over legal ramifications and the responsibility of the government. Jean Tsang, associate at Bates Wells and governor of a maintained primary school, addresses these questions and looks at the worrying effects of this ‘funding crisis’ on the ‘most vulnerable children’ in the educational system.
Cost cutting 21525611 s 146x219
August 16, 2019

Judicial review challenge over closure of children’s centres defeated by local authority

The case R (on the application of L, an infant (by his mother and litigation friend)) v Buckinghamshire County Council represents the first time when the High Court considered in detail the meaning of the ‘sufficiency duty’ in section 5A of the Childcare Act 2006 (ChA 2006) in the context of whether a council’s consultation on the closure of a number of children’s centres was unlawful or not. James Goudie QC examines the background to and the practical implications of the judgment.
Market 25240022 s 146x219
August 09, 2019

How does a local authority establish a market?

The LexisPSL team outline the powers available to local authorities looking to establish a new market.
School gate iStock 000003257894XSmall 146x219
August 02, 2019

Forced academisation of schools - is resistance futile?

What are the circumstances which lead to a school being forced to become an academy, and is there anything that can be done to stop it happening? Katie Michelon provides an overview of the forced academisation process, and explains the options available to schools, parents and local authorities when faced with the possibility of an Academy Order.
Plane passenger plane 19469 640 pixabay
June 13, 2019

Home or away?

Katherine Illsley outlines how a local authority should approach the situation where a parent to be assessed for the purposes of public children care lives in another jurisdiction.
House key iStock 000004543619XSmall 146x219
June 07, 2019

Tenant Fees Act 2019 - government guidance

The government recently published guidance on the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (TFA 2019). Robin Stewart and David Smith of Anthony Gold Solicitors look at some of the key questions relating to the guidance, including enforcement, penalties and some controversial aspects such as guidance pertaining to payment of damages.
Choice 33452110 s 146x219
June 07, 2019

How should the courts approach cases with an ‘open’ pool of possible perpetrators?

Chris Stevenson, barrister at Fourteen, examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Re B (children: uncertain perpetrator) to allow a father’s appeal against a Family Court judge’s finding that he was within a pool of possible perpetrators responsible for sexually transmitting gonorrhoea to three of his children (registration required).
Planning 146x219
May 24, 2019

Court of Appeal finds permissive housing policies can restrict development elsewhere

In Gladman Developments Ltd v Canterbury City Council [2019] EWCA Civ 669, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by developer Gladman against the decision of the High Court to quash planning permission granted on appeal for a residential development on a site not allocated for development, not on previously developed land, and outside the existing built-up area.
Child safety gate 36045624 s 146x219
May 24, 2019

Safety first?

Daljit Kaur looks at the implications for disability discrimination of a case concerning a nursery-age child prevented from accessing provision over 15 hours.
UK map 66823434 s 146x219
May 17, 2019

The changing landscape of local authority Trading Standards prosecutions?

Richard Heller considers the potential impact of Qualter and others v Crown Court at Preston [2019] EWHC 906 (Admin) could have on the way regional Trading Standards services investigate and prosecute criminal offences (registration required).
Child removal iStock 000007583512XSmall 146x219
May 17, 2019

Wish they weren't here?

Can a parent with parental responsibility object to their child, who is subject to an interim care order, being taken on holiday by their foster parents?
Housing Rogue Landlord 99725772 s 146x219
May 10, 2019

Exploring the new guidance on greater protections from rogue landlords

Jason Hobday, associate at Womble Bond Dickinson, discusses the implications of recent government guidance documents which intend to enforce greater protections from rogue landlords (registration required).
Bias iStock 000008329150XSmall 146x219
May 09, 2019

Court finds judge in Uber licensing case was not biased

Philip Kolvin QC examines the High Court’s decision in R (United Cabbies Group) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court to dismiss the claimant’s application for judicial review of a district judge’s grant of an operator’s licence for London private hire vehicles to the third interested party, Uber.
Housing timer 45568205 s 146x219
May 03, 2019

End of the road?

Morayo Fagborun Bennett looks at the Court of Appeal's decision on waiving offers of alternative accommodation and the lawfulness of an earlier review decision on a subsequent homelessness appplication in Godson v London Borough of Enfield [2019] EWCA Civ 486.
Council Tax 89947548 s 146x219
May 03, 2019

Court rejects implied duty to report change of address for council tax purposes (R v D)

Samuel Genen, solicitor at Steel & Shamash, comments on the case of R v D [2019] EWCA Crim 209 where the Court of Appeal ruled that a failure to notify the local council of a change of address for the purpose of council tax did not constitute a criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006). (Registration required)
Evidence in Foreign Courts 71283762 s 146x219
March 22, 2019

Is it in the best interests of a child to give evidence in a foreign trial?

Katherine Duncan explains how the court, in Re X, carried out a balancing exercise in determining whether a child, who was ward of the court, should be permitted to travel out of the jurisdiction to give evidence at a foreign criminal trial.
High Courts inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults 95112860 s 146x219
March 15, 2019

High Court’s inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults

The case of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council v Meyers [2019] EWHC 399 (Fam) highlights the wide and largely unfettered nature of the power to grant injunctive relief under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults and the difficulty surrounding the issue of how the balance should be struck between protection of a person on grounds of vulnerability and respect for their autonomy, writes Bethan Harris.