This page draws together a monthly selection of articles and features supplied by LexisNexis for publication on Local Government Lawyer and Public Law Today. We also showcase other publications and resources that LexisNexis produces to support lawyers working in the public sector. To see all articles, please click here.
Slide background

Safeguarding and the Court of Protection

Safeguarding and the Court of Protection 45418352 s 146x219Safeguarding issues frequently underpin or arise in welfare proceedings in the Court of Protection. LexisPSL Local Government, in partnership with Alex Ruck Keene, Michelle Pratley and the Legal Action Group, set out the key considerations.

(To access all the links in this article, use your LexisPSL subscription or register for a free 1 week trial of LexisPSL)

What is safeguarding?

‘Safeguarding’, in its broadest sense, encompasses all aspects of a person’s welfare. It is this meaning of safeguarding that informs the approach of local authorities to the provision of adult services.

References:

Law Commission’s report: Adult social care, Law Com No 326, May 2011, para 9.2 

However, in the context of proceedings in the Court of Protection the term ‘safeguarding’ is generally used to refer to what might more accurately be called ‘adult protection’: investigation and intervention by a public body where it is suspected that a person has been, is currently, or may in future be, the subject of abuse.

The statutory basis of safeguarding applications

Prior to the commencement of the Care Act 2014 (CA 2014), the safeguarding responsibilities on local authorities in England arose from a mixture of statutory obligations (including the duty to undertake community care assessments), statutory guidance and public law and human rights requirements.

References:

No Secrets: guidance on developing and implementing multi-agency policies and procedures to protect vulnerable adults from abuse, Department of Health/Home Office, 2000

CA 2014 changed the law by imposing specific safeguarding duties on local authorities in England. Equivalent duties were also introduced in Wales by the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014.

References:

Care Act 2014, s 1 (the duty to promote well-being)

CA 2014, s 42 (the duty of enquiry)

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 5 (the duty to promote well-being)

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 126 (the duty of enquiry)

It is important to note that it is not only local authorities who have safeguarding obligations: other bodies, most obviously national health service (NHS) bodies, also have responsibilities toward adults at risk and may find that those responsibilities necessitate bringing proceedings in the Court of Protection. While the changes set out in CA 2014 and the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 do not directly apply to such bodies, the general principles in relation to safeguarding and applications to the Court of Protection apply to them with equal force.

 

Safeguarding duties of local authorities

There are now two specific safeguarding duties imposed on local authorities: the duty to promote well-being and the duty of enquiry.

The duty to promote well-being

CA 2014 imposes an over-arching duty on English local authorities to promote the well-being of individuals when discharging its statutory care and support functions. ‘Well-being’ is defined as including protection from an abuse and neglect.

References:

CA 2014, s 1

An equivalent duty to promote well-being was also introduced in Wales.

References:

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 5

The duty of enquiry

CA 2014 also introduced a statutory duty of enquiry where an English local authority has reasonable cause to suspect that an adult in its area (whether or not ordinarily resident there):

References:

CA 2014, s 42

  • has needs for care and support (whether or not the authority is meeting any of those needs) (ie whether or not the adult is eligible for community care services provided by the local authority)
  • is experiencing, or is at risk of, abuse or neglect, and
  • as a result of those needs is unable to protect themselves against abuse or neglect or the risk of it

There is an equivalent duty of enquiry in Wales.

References:

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 126

 

The meaning of 'abuse'

Abuse is not defined in CA 2014 but the legislation makes clear that it includes financial abuse.

References:

CA 2014, s 42(3)

The statutory guidance accompanying CA 2014 provides that it also encompasses physical abuse, domestic violence, sexual abuse, psychological abuse, modern slavery, discriminatory abuse and organisational abuse. ‘Neglect’ is defined in the statutory guidance as including neglect by acts or omission such as ignoring medical, emotional or physical care needs, failure to provide access to appropriate health, care and support or educational services and the withholding of the necessities of life, such as medication, adequate nutrition and heating. It can also include self-neglect.

References:

Care and Support Statutory Guidance, Chapter 14 (updated 24 February 2017)

The Welsh legislation gives a more detailed definition of both abuse and neglect in the legislation itself.

References:

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 197

There is also a non-exhaustive list of examples given in the accompanying Welsh statutory guidance.

References:

Welsh government statutory guidance: Working Together to Safeguard People, Volume 1—Introduction and Overview, Pt 7, para 26

Neither the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014 nor the Welsh statutory guidance expressly provide for self-neglect, and indeed the language of the latter would suggest that self-neglect is outside the scope of neglect for these purposes.

Where the duty of enquiry arises, the local authority must make or cause to be made whatever enquiries it thinks necessary to enable it to decide whether any action should be taken in the adult’s care and, if so, what action and by whom.

References:

CA 2014, s 42(2)

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 126

Critically, CA 2014 does not introduce any additional powers for local authorities in respect of either the prevention or the investigation of abuse or neglect. The government declined the opportunity to introduce a power of entry by which a local authority would be able to seek a judicial warrant to enter a property and speak to an adult at risk. A different approach was taken in the Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, which includes a power for an authorised officer in Wales to apply for an adult protection and support order.

References:

Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act 2014, s 127

 

Safeguarding and the Court of Protection

The ability to apply to the Court of Protection is one of the most important powers that is available to local authorities in the adult protection context. As such, it is unsurprising that safeguarding concerns are at the heart of a significant proportion of welfare applications made by local authorities. Such applications are made because the local authority believes that an adult who lacks decision-making capacity in one or more domains has been subjected to, or is at risk of, harm. (See also: Alex Ruck Keene, Kelly Stricklin-Coutinho and Henry Gilfillan, ‘The role of the Court of Protection in safeguarding' [2015] Journal of Adult Protection 380).

It is common for local authorities to seek best interests declarations and/or decisions from the court in such cases that engage the vulnerable or protected person (P)’s human rights, most often under Article 8 but also at times under Articles 2, 3 and 5. An application must always be made where such rights are engaged and P, their family members or close friends do not agree that the safeguarding measures proposed by a local authority are in P’s best interests.

Difficulties frequently arise when local authorities are not sufficiently clear as to the specific requirements that arise when matters move from safeguarding investigation to proceedings before the court. A decision to instigate proceedings before the Court of Protection gives rise to a specific set of obligations upon the applicant, be that a local authority or NHS body, arising from the demands of the court process. See Practice Note: Fact-finding hearings in the Court of Protection for further details of fact-finding hearings as this is often a crucial part of safeguarding or adult protection proceedings.

Perhaps the most important point to emphasise here is that it is inappropriate for Court of Protection proceedings to be used as a ‘voyage of discovery’: the applicant must be satisfied at the outset that it has a satisfactory evidential basis for any allegations that it advances against those whom it contends have harmed the adult or from whom the adult is at risk. That evidential basis may, in a very urgent case, be limited, but as a general rule, it is clear that a local authority should not embark upon Court of Protection proceedings unless it is satisfied that it has the evidence that it will need at the final hearing to support factual allegations made against any individuals.

References:

A Local Authority v PB and P [2011] EWHC 502 (COP), at para 38

This means that a decision to bring proceedings has to be taken after a rigorous assessment (involving senior members of the social work management team and the legal department) to ensure that:

  • the evidence being put before the court is sufficiently cogent. While the standard of proof before the Court of Protection is the civil standard of balance of probabilities, it is axiomatic that a serious allegation should not be advanced without proper evidence (see A Local Authority v HS [2013] EWHC 2410 (COP) (not reported by LexisNexis®), at paras 184–186)
  • the sources of information forming the foundation of the decisions being made are checked and considered to be reliable

References:

Surrey CC v M [2013] EWHC 2400 (Fam)

'The fact that a piece of information has been repeated many times does not enhance its reliability'

  • Surrey CC v M at para 77, per Theis J, a case relating to similar concerns in care proceedings  where orders are being sought that interfere with P’s rights (most commonly under the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 8, but also Articles 2, 3 and 5), the picture being put to the court is a balanced one

References:

Surrey CC v M [2013] EWHC 2400 (Fam)

  • proper consideration has been given to whether it is necessary to put the allegations to the alleged abuser before taking steps upon the basis of those allegations. The obligation upon public bodies to treat parties affected by their actions in a just manner is capable of being overridden by the obligation to protect an adult at risk, but a failure to recognise that obligation can, itself, give rise to flawed decision-making

References:

Davis and Davis v West Sussex CC [2012] EWHC 2152 (QB)

The courts are alive to the fact that, on occasion, local authorities are on the horns of a dilemma, and that it may be necessary to invoke the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection urgently before it has been possible to investigate an allegation of abuse. (See A Local Authority v HS [2013] EWHC 2410 (COP) (not reported by LexisNexis®), at para 187).

However, in such a case, it is all the more important that stock is taken as soon as possible thereafter of matters. The failure to do so will lead to (at least) two adverse consequences:

References:

Somerset County Council v MK [2014] EWCOP B25 (damages not quantified)

Somerset County Council v MK [2015] EWCOP B1 (indemnity costs)

Milton Keynes Council v RR [2014] EWCOP B19

Essex County Council v RF [2015] EWCOP 1: (£60,000 damages, care home fees waived at a cost to the local authority of £23–£25,000, costs)

  • leaving allegations ‘[hanging] like a cloud’ over family members or other individuals, which can place those individuals in an unnecessarily adversarial position vis-à-vis the local authority and create a substantial distraction to the real welfare issues, and

References:

A London Borough v (1) BB (by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor) [2011] EWHC 2853 (Fam), at para 18

  • in the worst case scenario, very substantial damages and/or costs may be incurred unnecessarily by other parties, and then fall to be paid by the local authority:

‘There was a prolonged failure on the local authority’s part to recognise the weakness of its case. The allegations were vague and insufficiently particularised. The ‘evidence’ in support was manifestly inadequate. It was internally inconsistent and unreliable. The truth of what was alleged was assumed without any proper, critical, analysis’ (A Local Authority v HS [2013] EWHC 2410 (COP) (not reported by LexisNexis®), at paras 184–188)

The propositions set out above do not affect the general duty to place disputes before the court even where the best outcome may not be immediately clear. Court of Protection proceedings need not be adversarial and may be the best forum for resolving finely-balanced questions as to what may constitute the best and least restrictive alternative for P.

In all cases it is essential that the available evidence has been openly shared with the court and the parties. It is not for the local authority (or indeed any other party) to decide whether it is going to restrict or limit the evidence that it presents.

References:

Re W (Care Proceedings: Functions of Court and Local Authority) [2013] EWCA Civ 1227, [2014] 2 FLR 431

 

Safeguarding during Court of Protection proceedings

Public bodies can sometimes be unclear as to whether they can take safeguarding steps without the authorisation of the court, where safeguarding issues arise when proceedings are on foot in the Court of Protection.

The short answer is that the fact that Court of Protection proceedings are on foot does not alleviate the obligations on the local authority (or NHS body) where they have reason to believe that P has suffered harm or is at risk of harm. However, while they should take such steps as are immediately necessary to meet the situation, it is likely always to be necessary to bring the matter back to court if they will involve a substantial change in P’s circumstances (eg where P is living).

When there are ongoing proceedings in the Court of Protection, the issue of whether or not P should be the subject of an ‘achieving best evidence’ interview with the police must be raised with the court and subject to a direction from the judge, unless there is an absolutely pressing emergency.

References:

Enfield LBC v SA [2010] 1 FLR 1836

Where the substance of the interview might relate to allegations that another party to the proceedings (or someone closely connected to a party) had harmed P then there may be good grounds for the matter being raised, at least initially, without notice to that party. However, in every case, notice should be given to the Official Solicitor or any other person who acts as P’s litigation friend.

In some cases the involvement of the police will be required to implement decisions and declarations made by the Court of Protection. In such cases, parties should look to the guidance that has been given on involving the police in removing P from their home. (See LBH v GP and MP [2010] 13 CCLR 171 (unreported, 8 April 2009) (not reported by LexisNexis®), at para 31 per Coleridge J and Enfield LBC v SA [2010] 1 FLR 1836).

This article, from LexisPSL Local Government, was produced in partnership with Alex Ruck Keene and Michelle Pratley both of 39 Essex Chambers and the Legal Action Group, publishers of the Court of Protection Handbook from which parts of this article are taken.

This article was originally published in LexisPSL Private Client. If you would like to read more quality content like this, then register for a free 1 week trial of LexisPSL.

More content from LexisNexis

November 26, 2021

Costs order made against an intermediary (A local authority v Mother)

LexisPSL conduct a Family analysis on a case in which a Costs order was made against an intermediary (A local authority v Mother).
November 25, 2021

Court finds no duty to take past housing oversupply into account in assessing five-year target

LexisPSL conduct a planning analysis on the Tewkesbury BC v SSHCLG case, in which the court dismissed a challenge to an inspector’s decision to grant planning permission for a housing development.
November 19, 2021

Infrastructure planning - an error of law in the process of determining applications did not justify a quashing of the decisions

Joseph Cannon analyses the EFW Group Ltd v SSBEIS case, in which an error of law in the process of determining applications did not justify a quashing of the decisions.
November 12, 2021

Faith school legitimate expectation and discrimination challenges dismissed

Adam Heppinstall QC and Jack Castle explore a case in which the court dismissed legitimate expectations, discrimination and irrationality challenges against the decision to move a Sikh-faith Academy to another Trust.
November 04, 2021

Issuing and serving the claim form

Rebecca Lawrence considers the pitfalls and potential relief in procurement challenges and beyond (CitySprint UK v Barts Health NHS Trust).
November 01, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - Effectively tackling ASB

Join expert Housing barrister, Kuljit Bhogal and Susan Taylor, Senior Solicitor at Capsticks as they outline the latest thinking for social landlords on effectively tackling ASB.
October 15, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - the Liberty Protection Safeguards

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Alex Ruck-Keene and Emma Harrison look at how the new Liberty Protection Safeguards will work in practice when they replace the Deprivations of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS) next year.
October 14, 2021

Who examines the examiners?

Graeme Watson of Clyde & Co LLP considers the role of case examiners for the General Medical Council and the extent to which their decisions are open to challenge by disappointed patients.
October 07, 2021

Unregulated placements for children under 16

Can the High Court to still authorise, under its inherent jurisdiction, the deprivation of liberty of a child under the age of 16 following amendments to the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (England) Regulations 2010? Tahmina Rahman, barrister at 1GC Family Law, considers the issues.
September 30, 2021

Social care reforms in England - how will they work in practice?

Nicola Gunn of Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP, in association with Lexis PSL, considers what the reforms will mean in practice for those who require care.
September 24, 2021

The recovery of tuition fees

Imogen Proud analyses the decision of the High Court in SS Education v CCP Graduate School Ltd to deny the recovery of tuition fees under the Education (Student Support) Regulations 2011.
September 17, 2021

Local Government - new starter guide

The following LexisNexis practice note is aimed at trainee solicitors and those who are new to Local Government and explains the role of local government lawyers and provides an overview of the primary legal disciplines they will encounter.
September 07, 2021

Homelessness and eligibility

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note, produced in partnership with Iris Ferber of 42 Bedford Row, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the eligibility of applicants for housing assistance.
September 03, 2021

What is climate change litigation?

The following LexisNexis Environment practice note produced in partnership with Katharina Theil of Leigh Day and Richard Lord QC of Brick Court Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on the rise of climate change related litigation.
August 27, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - Local Authority Duties in Intercountry Adoption

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: Ruth Cabeza, barrister and author of the text, International Adoption, from Harcourt Chambers and Joy Hopkinson, Principal Social Care Lawyer from London Borough of Lambeth, discuss the issues for local authorities dealing with overseas placements both in a private and public law context.
August 26, 2021

Gambling law: at-a-glance guide

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Carl Rohsler of Memery Crystal provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the legal issues most pertinent to the gambling industry.
August 19, 2021

Delivering 21st-century customer experience in the public sector

Rachel Buchanan examines how legal teams should support their authorities in delivering tailored services at a time of restrained resources.
August 05, 2021

The Public Law Outline 2014

The following Family practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the operation of the Public Law Outline 2014 during the Covid-19 Pandemic.
July 29, 2021

IR35 and off-payroll workers

The following LexisNexis Tax practice note, produced in partnership with David Smith of DLA Piper, explains the IR35 regime which applies where either a public authority or a private sector entity engages a worker via an intermediary.
July 22, 2021

Food advertising

This LexisNexis Practice Note, produced in partnership with Katrina Anderson of Osborne Clarke, considers the law and practice applicable to food advertising to consumers.
July 15, 2021

CQC enforcement tracker

This Practice Note from LexisNexis provides a summary of key prosecutions for health and social care offences brought by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England since 2015. This tracker is intended to assist practitioners in monitoring the type of sentences which are being imposed for breaches of health and social care legislation.
July 09, 2021

Good faith in commercial agreements

The following Commercial practice note from LexisNexis examines the concept of good faith and the extent to which it is applied in commercial agreements.
June 28, 2021

Local Authority Insight Series - Climate Change

ON-DEMAND WEBINAR: What are the legal powers that local authorities can use to fight climate change and what legal obstacles do they face? Rachel McKoy, Stephen Cirell, Richard Honey QC and James Lupton consider the problems.
June 18, 2021

Possession - anti-social behaviour, nuisance and crime

This Local Government practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the options available to social housing landlords when taking possession proceedings against tenants engaged in anti-social behaviour.
June 11, 2021

Unlawful eviction and quiet enjoyment

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Laura Tweedy of Hardwicke Chambers explains what unlawful eviction is, how and when it may arise from a civil and criminal perspective, the civil remedies available and potential consequential causes of action, in particular a breach of a tenant’s right to quiet enjoyment.
June 04, 2021

Anti-social behaviour - powers to control behaviour

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note produced in partnership with Hardwicke Chambers provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the powers available under The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.
May 28, 2021

Introduction to public contracts procurement

The following LexisNexis Local Government practice note, produced in partnership with Katherine Calder of DAC Beachcroft, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information providing an introduction to public contracts procurement.
May 21, 2021

Housing disrepair for local authority landlords - a practical guide

This LexisNexis Local Government practice note, produced in partnership with Alexander Bastin of Hardwicke Chambers, discusses disrepair claims in relation to social housing, setting out the legal basis for a claim and other the relevant factors that need to be considered.
April 16, 2021

Education tracker

This Local Government practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering key upcoming developments of interest to Education lawyers from early years foundation stage (EFYS) to further and higher education.
April 09, 2021

Vulnerable persons - participation and evidence in family proceedings

The following Family practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the participation of vulnerable people and evidence in family proceedings.
March 31, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - implications for property

The following Property practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the implications for landlords of the Covid-19 pandemic.
March 19, 2021

Brexit - key legislation explained

The following Public Law practice note produced in partnership with Dr. Kieran Laird of Gowling WLG provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the key legislation governing Brexit.
March 12, 2021

Transparency in the family courts

Ths following Family practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering recent developments in the transparency of family court proceedings.
March 05, 2021

Use of confidential information in civil proceedings

This Dispute Resolution Practice Note from LexisNexis looks at the status and use of confidential information in civil proceedings including what confidential information is, how to protect confidential information and how confidentiality may be lost.
February 18, 2021

Brexit Timeline Tracker

This Practice Note sets out a timeline of key events and updates in the post-transition period, focussing in particular on the implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement and associated agreements.
February 11, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Children’s Social Care Tracker

This tracker is focused on children’s social care and is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to coronavirus (COVID-19) and children’s social care, where relevant to local government lawyers.
February 05, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Healthcare Tracker

This tracker is focused on healthcare and is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to coronavirus (COVID-19) and healthcare.
January 29, 2021

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Governance Tracker

This tracker from LexisNexis Local Government intended to be used to track the most recent key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to coronavirus (COVID-19) local authority governance, where relevant to local government lawyers.
January 21, 2021

Data protection under the EU GDPR

The following Information Law precedent from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering data protection after the final withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union.
January 14, 2021

Commencing criminal proceedings - applying for the issue of a summons

The following Corporate Crime practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the correct procedure for bring a criminal prosecution.
December 18, 2020

Education tracker

This Lexis®PSL Local Government future developments tracker is intended to be used to track key upcoming developments of interest to education lawyers covering the entire spectrum of education from early years foundation stage (EFYS) to further and higher education.
December 11, 2020

Termination for breach of contract

The following LexisNexis Dispute Resolution practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the identification and the process and implications of ending a contract due to breach.
December 03, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) – implications for property

The following Property practice note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the implications for commercial and residential property of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
November 27, 2020

Local Government Brexit tracker

This tracker is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to Brexit relevant to local government lawyers. It is arranged alphabetically by topic and is designed to provide an easy reference point for relevant content for lawyers to support preparation for and implementation of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union.
November 20, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Managing the Workplace

The following LexisNexis Employment practice note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the management of workplaces during the Coronavirus pandemic.
October 22, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Social Care Tracker

This LexisNexis tracker is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to COVID-19, where relevant to social care lawyers.
October 16, 2020

Coronavirus (COVID-19) - local government tracker

This LexisNexis tracker is intended to be used to track key developments, legislation, guidance, parliamentary briefing notes and other sources of interest relating to COVID-19, where relevant to local government lawyers.
October 09, 2020

The Planning White Paper

LexisNexis looks at the government's proposals for a ‘whole new planning system for England’ in White Paper published for consultation, alongside interim reforms.
October 02, 2020

The Public Sector Equality Duty

The following LexisNexis Public Law guidance note, produced in partnership with Zoe Bedford of Ellis Whittam, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the scope of the Public Sector Equality Duty.
September 25, 2020

Housing disrepair for local authority landlords - a practical guide

The following LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Alexander Bastin of Hardwicke, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information for local authorities covering all aspects of dealing with disrepair issues.
September 17, 2020

Employment law and Covid-19

This Employment guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering employment law issues arising from the Covid-19 pandemic.
September 11, 2020

Introduction to Public Contracts Procurement

The following LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Walker Morris, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering public contracts procurement, including the impact of Brexit.
September 04, 2020

Guide to Care Act 2014 repeals

The following LexisNexis Private Client guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering repealed legislation (in whole or in part), secondary legislation revoked (in whole or in part), relevant new secondary legislation and statutory guidance and directions cancelled.
August 21, 2020

Obtaining possession of a secure tenancy

The following LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Karl King of Hardwicke Chambers, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the grounds on which and steps required to obtain possession of a secure tenancy.
August 14, 2020

Obstruction of highways

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Nicholas Hancox Solicitors, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering a wide variety of circumstances in which public highways may be obstructed and what measures are available to councils to deal with them.
August 07, 2020

LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index: Quantifying legal demand growth and the impact of COVID-19

LexisNexis has built a data model to track growth in demand for legal services – the Gross Legal Product Index, or GLP. The report provides a framework for quantifying the impact of COVID-19 on your sector.
July 31, 2020

COVID-19: What’s worrying lawyers?

Elizabeth Rimmer of LawCare examines some of the issues encountered by lawyers when working remotely during the pandemic.
June 19, 2020

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) - practice and procedure

This Property Disputes guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the jurisdiction, practice and procedure of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
June 12, 2020

Quick guide to landlord’s remedies for breach of lease

The following property disputes guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information for commercial landlords.
June 05, 2020

The Public Law Outline 2014

This Practice Note provides practical guidance on key aspects of procedure and the PLO 2014 for public children proceedings.
May 07, 2020

Anti-social behaviour - powers to control behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Hardwicke Chambers, provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the powers available to control behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
May 01, 2020

Anti-social behaviour - powers to close premises under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This Local Government guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information outlining the powers available to local authorities to close premises where anti-social behaviour is taking place.
Coronavirus Hand sanitizer 146x219
April 24, 2020

Coronavirus – What’s the impact on the legal profession?

With Coronavirus dominating the news and the majority of Europe now entering different stages of lockdown due to the rise in uncertainties about the virus, LexisNexis has rounded up its latest articles discussing the pandemic.
Human Rights 96780326 s 146x219
April 23, 2020

Why is advancing the rule of law so important?

Have you ever considered your human rights? The Universal Declaration of Human Rights outlines our various rights under the law, the most basic being: “We are all equal before the law."But, is this really the case?
April 16, 2020

Employment law and Covid-19

This following employment guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information on employment law changes caused by the Covid-19 outbreak.
Roadworks 54101373 s 146x219
February 28, 2020

Road traffic – order procedure notices

This Local Government guidance note from LexisNexis provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering road traffic orders, regulations, procedures and the powers available to local authorities.
Housing Rogue Landlord 99725772 s 146x219
February 13, 2020

Obtaining possession of a secure tenancy

Produced in partnership with Karl King of Hardwicke Chambers, this LexisNexis Local Government guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the range of tenancy types for social housing and the processes involved in obtaining possession for each.
February 06, 2020

Local authority social care duties

The following Local Government guidance note, produced in partnership with Ros Ashcroft of DAC Beachcroft and Stephanie Townley of Addleshaw Goddard LLP provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering local authority duties towards social care.
January 31, 2020

Houses in multiple occupation

This LexisNexis Local Government guidance note provides comprehensive and up to date legal information covering the management, licensing and definition of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs).
December 13, 2019

Granting assured and assured shorthold tenancies

This practice note from LexisNexis explains the criteria for assured tenancies (AT) and assured shorthold tenancies (AST) and the exceptions to those criteria, the main terms of AT and ASTs, the position regarding succession, and summarises a landlord’s obligations in respect of energy efficiency, gas safety and other health and safety obligations, right to rent and tenancy deposits.
December 05, 2019

Assignment and succession of tenancy

Morayo Fagborun Bennett looks at the circumstances in which social housing tenancies can be transferred to another tenant.
November 29, 2019

Powers to control anti-social behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014

This guidance note provides a comprehensive and up to date overview of powers to control anti-social behaviour under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, Reform of anti-social behaviour powers (2014), Part 1 Civil Injunctions and Part 2 Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO).
Missiles 91309216 s. 146x219
October 11, 2019

Exploring the court’s power to block sale of arms to Saudi Arabia

Sue Willman, senior partner at Deighton Pierce Glynn, analyses the case of R (on the application of Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Secretary of State for International Trade (Amnesty International and others intervening) and its implications for UK arms trade.
Airport travel 3160566 640
October 11, 2019

Court rejects challenges to Heathrow expansion

Charles Streeten, barrister at Francis Taylor Building, explains how the court came to reject the claims for judicial review of the Heathrow runway expansion in R (on the application of Spurrier) v Secretary of State for Transport and other cases.
Housing family 96709182 s
October 04, 2019

Exploring the limits of public authority’s liability for children

Duncan Fairgrieve and Jim Duffy, barristers at 1 Crown Office Row, examine the Supreme Court’s decision in Poole Borough Council v GN and another that the respondent local authority did not owe a common law duty of care to exercise its functions under the Children Act 1989 to protect the appellants, who were children of a family which it had housed, from harm at the hands of anti-social neighbours.
Dead end road 32516564 s 146x219
October 04, 2019

Abandoning a procurement exercise - when can a contracting authority extinguish a challenge?

Lucy James looks at the legal effect of a decision to abandon a procurement exercise and whether it extinguishes an accrued cause of action a bidder may have against a contracting authority for breaches of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 SI 2015/102 (PCR 2015).
Education cuts 93374247 s 146x219
August 23, 2019

‘Funding crisis’ - a detailed look at the funding shortage in UK schools

According to campaigners, more than 200 schools in England are cutting their school weeks short due to funding shortages. This raises questions over legal ramifications and the responsibility of the government. Jean Tsang, associate at Bates Wells and governor of a maintained primary school, addresses these questions and looks at the worrying effects of this ‘funding crisis’ on the ‘most vulnerable children’ in the educational system.
Cost cutting 21525611 s 146x219
August 16, 2019

Judicial review challenge over closure of children’s centres defeated by local authority

The case R (on the application of L, an infant (by his mother and litigation friend)) v Buckinghamshire County Council represents the first time when the High Court considered in detail the meaning of the ‘sufficiency duty’ in section 5A of the Childcare Act 2006 (ChA 2006) in the context of whether a council’s consultation on the closure of a number of children’s centres was unlawful or not. James Goudie QC examines the background to and the practical implications of the judgment.
Market 25240022 s 146x219
August 09, 2019

How does a local authority establish a market?

The LexisPSL team outline the powers available to local authorities looking to establish a new market.
School gate iStock 000003257894XSmall 146x219
August 02, 2019

Forced academisation of schools - is resistance futile?

What are the circumstances which lead to a school being forced to become an academy, and is there anything that can be done to stop it happening? Katie Michelon provides an overview of the forced academisation process, and explains the options available to schools, parents and local authorities when faced with the possibility of an Academy Order.
Plane passenger plane 19469 640 pixabay
June 13, 2019

Home or away?

Katherine Illsley outlines how a local authority should approach the situation where a parent to be assessed for the purposes of public children care lives in another jurisdiction.
House key iStock 000004543619XSmall 146x219
June 07, 2019

Tenant Fees Act 2019 - government guidance

The government recently published guidance on the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (TFA 2019). Robin Stewart and David Smith of Anthony Gold Solicitors look at some of the key questions relating to the guidance, including enforcement, penalties and some controversial aspects such as guidance pertaining to payment of damages.
Choice 33452110 s 146x219
June 07, 2019

How should the courts approach cases with an ‘open’ pool of possible perpetrators?

Chris Stevenson, barrister at Fourteen, examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Re B (children: uncertain perpetrator) to allow a father’s appeal against a Family Court judge’s finding that he was within a pool of possible perpetrators responsible for sexually transmitting gonorrhoea to three of his children (registration required).
Planning 146x219
May 24, 2019

Court of Appeal finds permissive housing policies can restrict development elsewhere

In Gladman Developments Ltd v Canterbury City Council [2019] EWCA Civ 669, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by developer Gladman against the decision of the High Court to quash planning permission granted on appeal for a residential development on a site not allocated for development, not on previously developed land, and outside the existing built-up area.
Child safety gate 36045624 s 146x219
May 24, 2019

Safety first?

Daljit Kaur looks at the implications for disability discrimination of a case concerning a nursery-age child prevented from accessing provision over 15 hours.
UK map 66823434 s 146x219
May 17, 2019

The changing landscape of local authority Trading Standards prosecutions?

Richard Heller considers the potential impact of Qualter and others v Crown Court at Preston [2019] EWHC 906 (Admin) could have on the way regional Trading Standards services investigate and prosecute criminal offences (registration required).
Child removal iStock 000007583512XSmall 146x219
May 17, 2019

Wish they weren't here?

Can a parent with parental responsibility object to their child, who is subject to an interim care order, being taken on holiday by their foster parents?
Housing Rogue Landlord 99725772 s 146x219
May 10, 2019

Exploring the new guidance on greater protections from rogue landlords

Jason Hobday, associate at Womble Bond Dickinson, discusses the implications of recent government guidance documents which intend to enforce greater protections from rogue landlords (registration required).
Bias iStock 000008329150XSmall 146x219
May 09, 2019

Court finds judge in Uber licensing case was not biased

Philip Kolvin QC examines the High Court’s decision in R (United Cabbies Group) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court to dismiss the claimant’s application for judicial review of a district judge’s grant of an operator’s licence for London private hire vehicles to the third interested party, Uber.
Housing timer 45568205 s 146x219
May 03, 2019

End of the road?

Morayo Fagborun Bennett looks at the Court of Appeal's decision on waiving offers of alternative accommodation and the lawfulness of an earlier review decision on a subsequent homelessness appplication in Godson v London Borough of Enfield [2019] EWCA Civ 486.
Council Tax 89947548 s 146x219
May 03, 2019

Court rejects implied duty to report change of address for council tax purposes (R v D)

Samuel Genen, solicitor at Steel & Shamash, comments on the case of R v D [2019] EWCA Crim 209 where the Court of Appeal ruled that a failure to notify the local council of a change of address for the purpose of council tax did not constitute a criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006). (Registration required)
Evidence in Foreign Courts 71283762 s 146x219
March 22, 2019

Is it in the best interests of a child to give evidence in a foreign trial?

Katherine Duncan explains how the court, in Re X, carried out a balancing exercise in determining whether a child, who was ward of the court, should be permitted to travel out of the jurisdiction to give evidence at a foreign criminal trial.
High Courts inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults 95112860 s 146x219
March 15, 2019

High Court’s inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults

The case of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council v Meyers [2019] EWHC 399 (Fam) highlights the wide and largely unfettered nature of the power to grant injunctive relief under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction for the protection of vulnerable adults and the difficulty surrounding the issue of how the balance should be struck between protection of a person on grounds of vulnerability and respect for their autonomy, writes Bethan Harris.