Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Insolvency influx – the upsurge of CVAs

Icons CourtJames Nelson examines the rise in Company Voluntary Arrangements, analyses their impact on commercial leases and explains how landlords, including public bodies and local authorities, can respond.

In recent times, Company Voluntary Arrangements (‘CVA’) are becoming an increasingly utilised insolvency mechanism for cash strapped companies to settle existing debts owed to their creditors (including their landlords) and perhaps most importantly, to avoid administration or liquidation.

Nevertheless, despite the recent popularity of CVAs, there is a growing lobby of concern that CVAs are being used by these companies who are also commercial tenants as a means of dodging arrears of rent due under their leases.

As such, given the increasing use of CVAs in the current climate, commercial landlords should be aware of the potential ramifications for their properties and the inevitable knock on effect to their rental income.

An overview of the commercial property market

2020 was a challenging year for most businesses, a distressing year for a sizeable amount of those businesses and regrettably, a fatal year for some businesses. With the Government announcing a third national lockdown, which has now come into force and will be in effect until at least mid-February, many businesses are facing another period of significant economic uncertainty.

The UK Government has intervened with legislative measures designed to protect commercial tenants from financial demands and/or eviction – perhaps most notably, section 82 of the Coronavirus Act 2020 (moratorium on forfeiture for non-payment of rent) and the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (restrictions on Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (“CRAR”) and winding up petitions).

The effect of COVID-19 on the commercial property sector has been well documented since March 2020, as landlord-tenant relations in certain sectors have been strained by the impact of COVID-19 restrictions. Landlords and tenants alike have been forced to weigh up their property requirements and come to the negotiating table to attempt to broker rental concessions and organise repayment plans. It is estimated that approximately £4.5 billion of rent debts have accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic and the figure continues to rise.

Yet, despite government measures, many companies are still unable to meet their debts and are seeking ways of restructuring to stay afloat. The dire economic situation for a large portion of the retail/hospitality sector has led to several well-known chains entering into CVAs - such as Caffe Nero, Pizza Express, New Look and Clarks Shoes. Other companies, such as Vue International Cinemas and Cineworld, have threatened entering into a CVA if their landlords do not agree to their new rent proposals. The use of CVAs has risen threefold (33 in 2020, up from 11 in 2019) and many commentators are signalling that a new wave of CVAs may be rolling in within the coming months.

Why enter into a CVA?

A CVA is an insolvency rescue procedure which allows a company to settle debts by paying a proportion of what it owes to its creditors and/or agreeing a mode of payments for present and future debts (e.g. annual rent, service charges etc…).

A CVA has to be proposed and agreed by at least 75% of the voting creditors at a meeting. If the 75% figure is hit, the CVA passes and becomes legally binding as at the date of the meeting.

A CVA can set out numerous proposed terms over a set period with regard the liabilities of the particular company – which can include the modification and variation of commercial lease terms (of which the parties had originally agreed to be bound by when they entered into the lease). Provisions such as rent concessions, rent reductions, new termination rights, dilapidations waivers and even a ‘COVID-19 Lockdown Relief’ clause (where rent is suspended in the event of a nationwide or even a tiered lockdown) have been seen in recent times.

The core feature of a CVA is its flexibility, as it gives commercial tenants the opportunity to set out (albeit, unilaterally) a variety of restructuring proposals.

The autonomy afforded to companies under the CVA procedure has led to accusations that some commercial tenants are abusing the process to write off substantial rent arrears and to absolve themselves of financial failings and mismanagement.

Commercial landlord lobbying groups, such as the British Property Federation, have called for a revamp of the existing insolvency law to make the CVA procedure fairer by giving proportionate voting rights in favour of those to which the CVA compromises the most (i.e. the voting rights being commensurate with the size of the debt owed by the company).

Tips for Commercial Landlords

Commercial landlords should be aware of their options at the outset of a CVA being proposed and it would be advisable put in place contingency plans ahead of any prospective CVA.

There are numerous factors that should be considered and if you are a landlord you would be well advised to obtain legal advice on the proposed terms of any CVA. However, some of the main considerations for commercial landlords are as follows:

  1. Preparation - make sure if you are entering into a new lease that you undertake due diligence on any incoming tenants.  Monitor tenant liquidity throughout the term of the lease and keep an eye on the headlines for news/rumours regarding your tenant’s financial performance and position.
  2. Announcement – once your tenant has confirmed the CVA proposal, act promptly and review the terms of the CVA - or better still, have your solicitor do so for you. If you have a rent deposit in place, consider drawing against it (if there is outstanding rent due) as a CVA will usually restrict your right to draw against the deposit.
  3. Attendance – attendance at the creditors meeting is not compulsory, but being present is the best way that you can voice your opinion and ultimately vote for/against the proposal.
  4. Challenge – if the CVA is approved and there are grounds for challenge, consider whether you can make one. Although challenge is limited to two specific grounds under the 1986 Insolvency Act (which, in summary, are: (i) unfair prejudice and (ii) material irregularity), an experienced litigation solicitor or insolvency barrister will be able to advise you on the merits of a potential challenge.
  5. Exit Options – if you are unhappy with what has been proposed under the CVA, consider whether there are any exit options provided under the same OR whether you can forfeit the lease for insolvency (a landlords property rights are not usually extinguished by the CVA). If you have other eager prospective tenants in the wings, the financial benefit of a new tenant with greater covenant strength may outweigh another three years with a tenant that is unlikely to pay much towards rent.

James Nelson is a solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard, which has extensive experience in acting for a broad spectrum of commercial landlords in connection with CVA’s – from public bodies and local authorities to high net worth individuals and property investment companies. For further information on how we may be able to assist, please contact James on This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
Icons Hazard

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Alastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
Icons Court

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
<a href=

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Icons Court

Climate emergency or climate catastrophe?

Rob Hann asks how central & local government departments and councils can work together more effectively to combat the challenges to achieve net zero by 2050.
Slide background