One in ten private family law applications involve non-parents, research finds

Research published by Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (Nuffield FJO) has found that private family law applications involving non-parents are diverse, and “circumstances may overlap with public law cases”.

The vast majority of these applications to the family court usually involve separated parents who are struggling to agree arrangements for their children.

However, according to the Nuffield FJO data, 10% of private law applications each year feature people who aren’t parents.

The research, Uncovering private family law: Exploring applications that involve non-parents, highlighted that this 10% minority of cases is a “very sizeable group”, with around 5,500 such applications made each year in England and 300 in Wales.

The organisation said this was equivalent to around a third of the volume of public law applications for a care or supervision order.

The report argued that to date, "the private law reform agenda has focussed squarely on separating parents, overlooking the needs of this wider group of families."

The study, carried out by the Family Justice Data Partnership – a collaboration between Lancaster University and Swansea University – investigated private law applications involving non-parents in England and Wales over a four-year period (2017/18 to 2020/21).

Nuffield FJO noted that the study showed “a diversity in terms of non-parents involved in applications, including grandparents, aunts and uncles, siblings, step-parents, special guardians, foster carers, intended parents in surrogacy cases and putative fathers.”

Grandparents accounted for 58% of all non-parents involved in England and 63% in Wales, the study found.

A wide variety of orders were applied for, but a “clear majority” of applications were for a child arrangements order – 56% in England and 59% in Wales. In England, a high number were applications by extended family members for children to live with them.

The study found that these applications are “in addition to other application types that suggest children are being cared for away from their parents, such as special guardianship orders”.

They are likely to represent situations where there were “concerns for children's safety or welfare and a possible overlap with the circumstances of care cases”, the researchers noted. The study found a “significant proportion of these types of cases” – at least 38%.

Apart from child arrangements orders, other orders applied for during the four-year period included special guardianship (7.9% in England and 6.0% in Wales), adoption (16% in Wales), parental responsibility (5.2% in England and 2.2% in Wales) and parental orders in surrogacy cases (5.7% in England and 2.3% in Wales). The research noted the “very different circumstances of some of these types of cases”.

The study found that overall, applications “disproportionately involved people living in the more deprived areas of England and Wales – to a greater extent than in standard private family law applications, where there is also a clear link between deprivation and private law”.

The research also revealed that adults from ethnic minority backgrounds in England were “less likely to feature in non-parent applications than in applications involving two parents.”

Lisa Harker, director of Nuffield FJO, said: “For some families, taking a private law route may offer a way to find solutions and to formalise arrangements for children without the involvement of children’s services. But for other families, we suspect the reality may be less positive. There may be an overlap between what we might typically see as private law and public law issues, with child protection concerns potentially playing out in the background in private law cases, yet children and families may not be receiving the support they need from the private law courts.

“For example, careful consideration needs to be given to whether children’s views are being heard – as unlike in public law proceedings, children are not automatically separately represented in private cases. Other rights that come with public law proceedings, such as legal aid for parents, are also not given to those in the private law system.”

She added: “This leaves many potentially vulnerable adults without access to adequate legal advice and support in navigating the complexity of the family justice system, including making an application for the most appropriate type of order.”

Dr Linda Cusworth, Lancaster University, was the lead author of the report. She said: “The evidence is much less developed for private than for public law, despite that over three times as many private law cases are started each year in England and Wales than public ones – there were 54,600 new private law cases compared to 16,400 public law cases in 2021, according to the Ministry of Justice.

“While non-parent cases represent just 10% of private law cases, they involve thousands of people and potentially high levels of need and complexity. Yet, to date, the private law reform agenda has focused on separating parents, overlooking the needs of this wider group of families.

“This is the first population-based study to explore these types of private law applications in England and Wales. We have examined the diversity of applications and the individuals involved, enabling a better understanding of their circumstances to increase the evidence base. We hope this report will promote useful discussions, and help practitioners and policymakers to focus on how best to meet the needs of families.”

Lottie Winson