Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Newsletter registration
Injunctions to restrain breaches of planning control
Who bears the burden?
Lawfulness and applications for a CLEUD
The OIA’s 2026 operating plan: What universities need to know
The Cardiff Airport subsidy control ruling
White Paper on SEN reforms: some lessons from the current Welsh SEN system
Greyhound racing and the separation of powers
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369
The Hillsborough Law Bill: implications for public bodies
Dispensing with notice to father
Court of Protection case update April 2026
The new PD27A: a step change in Family Court bundle and document management
Déjà Vu – the implications of Zenobē Energy’s latest case for local government
The ERA – Benefits and Working Conditions
£150m Clean Maritime Grant Competition Opens – Critical Subsidy Control Steps for Applicants
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Why I Wanted to Explore Intensity of Review Across the UK and New Zealand
Asylum hotels, overcrowding and the HMO rules
Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
Intentional homelessness and tenancies obtained by false statement
Defective but not fatal
Self-grants of planning permission, functional separation and demolition avoidance
The lawfulness of emailing licensing decision notices
Intervention: the Monitoring Officer’s view
The role of the backbench councillor
FOI and information held on computer systems
Sentencing guidelines for HSE offences and public bodies
Correcting mistakes in public decision making
The Supreme Court on termination of JCT contracts
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 - what it means for local authorities
DOLS and Under 16s: Insights from Medway Council v A Father
The Local Power Plan: Putting Clean Power in Communities’ Hands
The powers of exclusion panels
Removal from kinship care
When school discipline meets disability
Navigating the expansion of foster care
Personal welfare deputies – Lawson and Mottram strikes back?
No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Adoption vs long-term fostering
Evolution of the academy trust and maintained school landscape
Care leavers and redaction of records
“Unusual facts and procedural irregularities”
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
Land value and the principle of reality
The latest Sizewell C JR
Impecuniosity and other issues in credit hire claims
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance Teams
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy Routes
Disclosure to the DBS
The CAT and the New Lottery Subsidy Control challenge
Gender-questioning children under draft KCSIE 2026
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The convergence of DRS, Simpler Recycling and EPR
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 Order
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy Control
Make Europe Build Again – The EU Industrial Accelerator Act
Affordable housing funding news & unlocking S106 units
The Social and Affordable Housing Programme 2026–2036: new guidance
Housing case alert - February 2026
Residential developments: new section 106 delivery roadmap
The Renters Rights Act and social landlords
Assured tenancies: written statements and information sheets
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On - How procurement processes are evolving
Book review: “Reforming lessons”
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Mobile phones, AI and schools
Transparency in FII cases
Court documents and AI
Next steps for the LGPS after the access and fairness consultation
What is an Officer?
The High Court on the EHRC’s “interim update”
Substituted decision notices and contempt of court
Social media guidance for members
2026 in construction: a look ahead
Track allocation in housing disrepair claims
Withdrawing applications for care orders
Appropriate professional boundaries for teachers
Children under 16 and deprivation of liberty
A Welsh white leopard?
Conversion to an ‘empty’ MAT
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Must read
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Environment Agency becomes first regulator to use new civil sanctions
- Details
The Environment Agency last month became the first enforcement body to use new civil sanctions for environmental offences as an alternative to criminal prosecution.
The watchdog accepted an offer of £21,000 from engineering and IT business Invensys for packaging waste offences. The company has also agreed to implement a number of improvements to ensure it complies with the relevant regulations, and will meet the cost of the investigation and future monitoring.
The £21,000 will be handed to organisations that can drive environmental improvements in local communities.
The sanctions used by the EA were introduced by the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act in England and Wales in 2008. The watchdog – which can use them for some, but not all, of the offences it enforces – first started using them on 4 January 2011.
Under these provisions organisations that breach environmental regulation can, where an enforcement undertaking is available for that breach, set out how they propose to put the matter right. If the Environment Agency accepts their proposals, the enforcement undertaking becomes a legally binding voluntary agreement.
The undertaking sets out the steps the business will take to put right any harm caused and can include providing compensation for the local community. “It must also identify what the business will do to return to compliance, in both the immediate term and long term,” the EA said.
So far the agency has received some 30 offers from a range of organisations that have broken environmental regulations. These have included proposals such as setting up a local community recycling awareness scheme, donations to a range of environmental charities and provision of funding for a local school environmental project.
Environment Agency Director of Environment and Business, Ed Mitchell said: “Civil sanctions are an alternative to criminal prosecution for less serious environment offences - such as breaking packaging waste regulations. They allow us to secure regulatory compliance from organisations, eliminate any financial gain from non-compliance and get them to react responsibly to the offending.
“Organisations can make reparations that focus on environmental improvements and providing benefits for the local people affected by the offences.”
Mitchell said the addition of civil sanctions to the agency’s enforcement toolkit saved it time and money – “freeing up our legal resources to prosecute more serious environmental offenders”.
Civil sanctions are only available to regulators assessed as “better regulators”.
The Environment Agency last month became the first enforcement body to use new civil sanctions for environmental offences as an alternative to criminal prosecution.
The watchdog accepted an offer of £21,000 from engineering and IT business Invensys for packaging waste offences. The company has also agreed to implement a number of improvements to ensure it complies with the relevant regulations, and will meet the cost of the investigation and future monitoring.
The £21,000 will be handed to organisations that can drive environmental improvements in local communities.
The sanctions used by the EA were introduced by the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act in England and Wales in 2008. The watchdog – which can use them for some, but not all, of the offences it enforces – first started using them on 4 January 2011.
Under these provisions organisations that breach environmental regulation can, where an enforcement undertaking is available for that breach, set out how they propose to put the matter right. If the Environment Agency accepts their proposals, the enforcement undertaking becomes a legally binding voluntary agreement.
The undertaking sets out the steps the business will take to put right any harm caused and can include providing compensation for the local community. “It must also identify what the business will do to return to compliance, in both the immediate term and long term,” the EA said.
So far the agency has received some 30 offers from a range of organisations that have broken environmental regulations. These have included proposals such as setting up a local community recycling awareness scheme, donations to a range of environmental charities and provision of funding for a local school environmental project.
Environment Agency Director of Environment and Business, Ed Mitchell said: “Civil sanctions are an alternative to criminal prosecution for less serious environment offences - such as breaking packaging waste regulations. They allow us to secure regulatory compliance from organisations, eliminate any financial gain from non-compliance and get them to react responsibly to the offending.
“Organisations can make reparations that focus on environmental improvements and providing benefits for the local people affected by the offences.”
Mitchell said the addition of civil sanctions to the agency’s enforcement toolkit saved it time and money – “freeing up our legal resources to prosecute more serious environmental offenders”.
Civil sanctions are only available to regulators assessed as “better regulators”.







