SPOTLIGHT

A zero sum game?

The number of SEND tribunal cases is rising and the proportion of appeals ‘lost’ by local authorities is at a record high. Lottie Winson talks to education lawyers to understand the reasons why, and sets out the results of Local Government Lawyer’s exclusive survey.

Ombudsman warns of gaps in redress in Special Educational Needs system if parents take cases to Tribunal

There are gaps in the redress system to put things right for people if problems occur when parents of children with Special Educational Needs (SEN) take their cases to Tribunal, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has warned.

Michael King’s comments came after an Ombudsman investigation found Dudley took 104 weeks – instead of the 20 weeks specified in statutory guidance – to complete and issue a boy’s final Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan.

The parents had to make multiple appeals to the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) Tribunal to secure the final plan.

The LGO said its jurisdiction prevented it from investigating any parts of a complaint where there is a right of appeal to the Tribunal, and that as a result it had been restricted to investigating only a small part of the delays the parents in this case experienced.

“This restriction applied when the council originally refused to assess the boy to consider if he needed an EHC plan. The parents successfully appealed this decision. They had to appeal again when the council then refused to issue a plan. And when the final plan was eventually completed, the parents had to submit a further appeal because they were unhappy with the school the council decided he should attend,” the LGO said.

The Ombudsman’s investigation found when the family complained to the council, it accepted it was at fault for the way in which it handled the case, but it did not apologise. The council also took too long to deal with the family’s subsequent complaint.

The LGO added that, during the council’s own investigation, the mother was sent internal documents which suggested some officers had made judgements about the case and pre-determined whether the boy required the support a plan would offer.

Dudley has since made changes to improve its services to families of children with SEN, including increasing staff numbers, training staff and improving its complaints handling.

The council has also agreed to:

  • pay the mother £1,800 to be used for her son’s educational purposes;
  • pay her a further £500 for her time and trouble in bringing the complaint;
  • provide the Ombudsman with details of the training it has arranged.

Mr King said: “We have issued this report to show there are gaps in the system which mean parents, carers and young people are left with restrictions in what we can investigate and put right for them because of the way our jurisdiction operates alongside that of the Tribunal.

“We know from the investigations we carry out that parents often feel like they are left battling the system to get their children the support they are entitled to.

“It is all the more worrying then, when we uncover cases like this where parents are not treated with dignity and respect, and are instead subject to comments from senior officers which are both unprofessional and inappropriate.

“I welcome the steps Dudley council has already taken to improve its services to children and their families during the investigation, and its readiness to accept my recommendations.”