Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Awaab’s Law and Fitness for Human Habitation – the same, but different?
Daylight/sunlight material consideration for planning purposes
Article 4 Directions in Wales
Not all fun and games
Children law update - October 2025
Where now for the ‘right’ to park?
Zip-wires in caverns
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
The Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 and rent paid during periods of unfitness
From the front line of HMO licensing
Housing case alert: September/October 2025
DCLG launches planning blitz: CIL, s. 106 agreements and "call-in" process affected
- Details
The Department for Communities and Local Government’s barrage of planning initiatives and guidance continued this week, with measures covering the Community Infrastructure Levy, s. 106 obligations and the call-in process.
Planning minister John Healey yesterday:
- Published guidance for councils on how to set up the Community Infrastructure Levy, the regulations for which come into force on 6 April
- Issued a consultation paper on policy on the use of s. 106
- Confirmed the government would implement the findings of a review on improvements to the “call-in” process, which would include new guidance for statutory agencies such as English Heritage, the Environment Agency and Sport England, and
- Announced a £4.5m grant for Planning Aid, the independent advice service for local people and community organisations.
The review on the “call-in” process recommended that fewer cases should be called-in. The government estimates that this would save up to £2m a year for applicants, while 300 cases a year that are considered for call-in return could be returned to local authorities quicker.
The DCLG said it would publish a new guide for members of the public, explaining how the call-in process works.
The minister added that he was looking for councils to follow the examples of authorities highlighted by the Planning Advisory Service as using planning obligations in an effective way to support local skills, training and apprenticeship schemes.
These include the London Borough of Greenwich, which has secured £25m towards its Greenwich Local Labour and Business initiative, and Barking and Dagenham Council, which has funding through s. 106 agreements in addition to money and support available through Jobcentre Plus, the ConstructionSkills levy scheme and national apprenticeships funding.
Healey said: “The power of government investment is helping build the homes this country needs, and keep workers on sites across the country. But we also need to cut red tape and get the developments underway without unnecessary delay.
“That’s why I want councils to make full use of the new Community Infrastructure Levy, so the necessary changes to local roads, schools and hospitals can be made to support these new developments.”
The Department for Communities and Local Government’s barrage of planning initiatives and guidance continued this week, with measures covering the Community Infrastructure Levy, s. 106 obligations and the call-in process.
Planning minister John Healey yesterday:
- Published guidance for councils on how to set up the Community Infrastructure Levy, the regulations for which come into force on 6 April
- Issued a consultation paper on policy on the use of s. 106
- Confirmed the government would implement the findings of a review on improvements to the “call-in” process, which would include new guidance for statutory agencies such as English Heritage, the Environment Agency and Sport England, and
- Announced a £4.5m grant for Planning Aid, the independent advice service for local people and community organisations.
The review on the “call-in” process recommended that fewer cases should be called-in. The government estimates that this would save up to £2m a year for applicants, while 300 cases a year that are considered for call-in return could be returned to local authorities quicker.
The DCLG said it would publish a new guide for members of the public, explaining how the call-in process works.
The minister added that he was looking for councils to follow the examples of authorities highlighted by the Planning Advisory Service as using planning obligations in an effective way to support local skills, training and apprenticeship schemes.
These include the London Borough of Greenwich, which has secured £25m towards its Greenwich Local Labour and Business initiative, and Barking and Dagenham Council, which has funding through s. 106 agreements in addition to money and support available through Jobcentre Plus, the ConstructionSkills levy scheme and national apprenticeships funding.
Healey said: “The power of government investment is helping build the homes this country needs, and keep workers on sites across the country. But we also need to cut red tape and get the developments underway without unnecessary delay.
“That’s why I want councils to make full use of the new Community Infrastructure Levy, so the necessary changes to local roads, schools and hospitals can be made to support these new developments.”
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Contracts Lawyer
Senior Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contracts Team
Lawyer (Planning and Regulatory)
Principal Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contract
Legal Director - Government and Public Sector
Locums
Poll






