Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1


Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Must read

LGL Red line

A group of councils and campaign groups have won a key judicial review case against the government, forcing it to hold further consultations before beginning work on the controversial third runway at Heathrow.

In his ruling, High Court judge Lord Justice Carnwath ruled that the 2003 Air Transport White Paper – in which the third runway was first proposed - was “obsolete” because of the subsequent Climate Change Act 2008.

He said that for the government to continue with the third runway, it must now review the climate change implications of Heathrow expansion, the economic case for a third runway, and the issue of how additional passengers would get to a bigger airport. He also called on the government to ensure that future aviation policy takes into account the implications of the 2008 Climate Change Act.

Lord Justice Carnwath said that he would be “surprised” if the recent tripling of the estimated cost to society of emitting carbon did not have “a significant effect” on the economic case for the runway and said that "it makes no sense to treat the economic case as settled in 2003."

The claimants were Hammersmith and Fulham, Hounslow, Hillingdon, Richmond upon Thames, Wandsworth and Windsor & Maidenhead councils as well as Greenpeace, the Council for the Protection of Rural England, the World Wildlife Fund UK, local residents group and aircraft noise campaigners HACAN. They were supported by The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, Transport for London and the Mayor of London. The local authorities are all members of the 2M Group which comprises 24 local councils opposed to Heathrow expansion with a combined population of 5 million.

Lord Justice Carnforth also accepted the claimants' argument that there is no credible plan in place to transport millions of extra passengers to an expanded Heathrow. However, he did not order the government to cancel the project and has adjourned the case until next month to allow the parties to make submissions on what formal orders the High Court should make.

While accepting the need to revisit the policy issues surrounding the decision to build the third runway, the government has promised to continue with the project. Lord Adonis, the Transport Secretary, told the BBC: "A new runway at Heathrow will help secure jobs and underpin economic growth as we come out of recession. It is also entirely compatible with our carbon reduction target, as demonstrated in the recent report by the Committee on Climate Change."

A group of councils and campaign groups have won a key judicial review case against the government, forcing it to hold further consultations before beginning work on the controversial third runway at Heathrow.

In his ruling, High Court judge Lord Justice Carnwath ruled that the 2003 Air Transport White Paper – in which the third runway was first proposed - was “obsolete” because of the subsequent Climate Change Act 2008.

He said that for the government to continue with the third runway, it must now review the climate change implications of Heathrow expansion, the economic case for a third runway, and the issue of how additional passengers would get to a bigger airport. He also called on the government to ensure that future aviation policy takes into account the implications of the 2008 Climate Change Act.

Lord Justice Carnwath said that he would be “surprised” if the recent tripling of the estimated cost to society of emitting carbon did not have “a significant effect” on the economic case for the runway and said that "it makes no sense to treat the economic case as settled in 2003."

The claimants were Hammersmith and Fulham, Hounslow, Hillingdon, Richmond upon Thames, Wandsworth and Windsor & Maidenhead councils as well as Greenpeace, the Council for the Protection of Rural England, the World Wildlife Fund UK, local residents group and aircraft noise campaigners HACAN. They were supported by The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, Transport for London and the Mayor of London. The local authorities are all members of the 2M Group which comprises 24 local councils opposed to Heathrow expansion with a combined population of 5 million.

Lord Justice Carnforth also accepted the claimants' argument that there is no credible plan in place to transport millions of extra passengers to an expanded Heathrow. However, he did not order the government to cancel the project and has adjourned the case until next month to allow the parties to make submissions on what formal orders the High Court should make.

While accepting the need to revisit the policy issues surrounding the decision to build the third runway, the government has promised to continue with the project. Lord Adonis, the Transport Secretary, told the BBC: "A new runway at Heathrow will help secure jobs and underpin economic growth as we come out of recession. It is also entirely compatible with our carbon reduction target, as demonstrated in the recent report by the Committee on Climate Change."

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory