Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Awaab’s Law and Fitness for Human Habitation – the same, but different?
Daylight/sunlight material consideration for planning purposes
Article 4 Directions in Wales
Not all fun and games
Children law update - October 2025
Where now for the ‘right’ to park?
Zip-wires in caverns
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
The Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 and rent paid during periods of unfitness
From the front line of HMO licensing
Housing case alert: September/October 2025
DCLG receives 56 bids to set up local enterprise partnerships
- Details
A total of 56 proposals for local enterprise partnerships were submitted in time for yesterday’s deadline, the Department for Communities and Local Government has revealed.
Ministers will now review the plans, with an emphasis on how they support economic growth.
Feedback will then be given ahead of publication of the government’s White Paper on sub-national economic growth and the introduction of the Localism Bill.
Ministers claimed that many of the proposals were “radical in their approach” and had put forward innovative ways of tackling the challenges facing individual local economies.
LEPs could “rewrite the economic geography of the country – unconstrained by the arbitrary boundaries of Regional Development Agencies and the top-down prescription approach taken previously”, the DCLG added.
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles claimed the proposals were just the beginning of a new radical way of delivering prosperity and rebalancing the economy.
He said: "We are facing economic problems that need solutions from local communities. The secret to the success of local enterprise partnerships will be working on the basis of local economic geography – gone are the artificial political regions of RDAs – this will better serve the needs of local business.
"The bureaucracy of Regional Development Agencies gave local authorities little reason to engage creatively with economic issues. Local enterprise partnerships are a way of tying council and business interests together, and creating the conditions for business to thrive and prosper."
Business Secretary Vince Cable insisted that there must be genuine partnership between business and local government and that LEPs should be practical bodies for promoting enterprise, not talking shops.
He added: "Trade and investment promotion, sector leadership, innovation, business support and access to finance will in future be led nationally, though with devolved local management in many cases. This still leaves huge scope for local initiatives to promote enterprise.
“The outcome will vary just as local economic priorities differ across the country. In some areas, there might be a focus on skills. In others, local enterprise partnerships may help set priorities for planning and infrastructure decisions. The key is that these partnerships are built from the bottom-up and will have the flexibility to determine their own agenda, rather than have it handed down to them by Whitehall."
The government has also closed the consultation on the £1bn, two-year Regional Growth Fund, which is intended to provide support for projects that “offer significant potential for sustainable economic growth and can create new private sector jobs”.
Earlier this week the Institute of Directors insisted that only elected officials should occupy local authority positions on LEP boards. The IoD also called for a focus on transport, infrastructure and planning..
The full list of local enterprise partnership proposals is:
- Bexley, Dartford, and Gravesham
- Birmingham and Solihull with East Staffordshire, Lichfield and Tamworth
- Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole
- Brighton and Hove, Croydon, the Gatwick Diamond and West Sussex - Coast to Capital
- Cheshire and Warrington
- County Durham
- Coventry and Warwickshire
- Cumbria
- Devon, Plymouth and Torbay
- East Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and North Essex)
- East Sussex
- Empowering Enterprise - Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly
- Enterprise M3 – Covers parts of Hampshire and Surrey including Andover, Basingstoke, Aldershot, Farnborough, Fleet, Hook and Camberley
- Fylde Coast, Lancashire
- Gatwick Diamond
- Gloucester, Swindon and Wiltshire
- Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough
- Greater Lincolnshire
- Greater Manchester
- Hampshire
- Heart of the South West
- Hertfordshire
- Hull, East Riding & Scarborough
- Humber
- Kent and Medway
- Kent-Essex
- Lancashire
- Leeds City Region
- Leicester and Leicestershire
- Liverpool City Region
- Newcastle Gateshead
- Norfolk
- North East
- Northamptonshire
- Northumberland and North Tyneside
- Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, Derby and Derbyshire,
- Oxfordshire City Region
- Pennine Lancashire
- Sheffield City Region
- Solent
- South East Midlands
- South Somerset and East Devon
- South Tyneside and Sunderland
- Stoke-on -Trent and Staffordshire
- Surrey Connects
- Tees Valley
- Thames Valley Berkshire
- Thames Valley Buckinghamshire
- The Black Country
- The Marches Enterprise Partnership – Shropshire and Herefordshire
- The Peel Group – Atlantic Gateway – Liverpool and Manchester
- Visitor Economy Southern England
- West Midlands
- West of England
- Worcestershire
- York and North Yorkshire
A total of 56 proposals for local enterprise partnerships were submitted in time for yesterday’s deadline, the Department for Communities and Local Government has revealed.
Ministers will now review the plans, with an emphasis on how they support economic growth.
Feedback will then be given ahead of publication of the government’s White Paper on sub-national economic growth and the introduction of the Localism Bill.
Ministers claimed that many of the proposals were “radical in their approach” and had put forward innovative ways of tackling the challenges facing individual local economies.
LEPs could “rewrite the economic geography of the country – unconstrained by the arbitrary boundaries of Regional Development Agencies and the top-down prescription approach taken previously”, the DCLG added.
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles claimed the proposals were just the beginning of a new radical way of delivering prosperity and rebalancing the economy.
He said: "We are facing economic problems that need solutions from local communities. The secret to the success of local enterprise partnerships will be working on the basis of local economic geography – gone are the artificial political regions of RDAs – this will better serve the needs of local business.
"The bureaucracy of Regional Development Agencies gave local authorities little reason to engage creatively with economic issues. Local enterprise partnerships are a way of tying council and business interests together, and creating the conditions for business to thrive and prosper."
Business Secretary Vince Cable insisted that there must be genuine partnership between business and local government and that LEPs should be practical bodies for promoting enterprise, not talking shops.
He added: "Trade and investment promotion, sector leadership, innovation, business support and access to finance will in future be led nationally, though with devolved local management in many cases. This still leaves huge scope for local initiatives to promote enterprise.
“The outcome will vary just as local economic priorities differ across the country. In some areas, there might be a focus on skills. In others, local enterprise partnerships may help set priorities for planning and infrastructure decisions. The key is that these partnerships are built from the bottom-up and will have the flexibility to determine their own agenda, rather than have it handed down to them by Whitehall."
The government has also closed the consultation on the £1bn, two-year Regional Growth Fund, which is intended to provide support for projects that “offer significant potential for sustainable economic growth and can create new private sector jobs”.
Earlier this week the Institute of Directors insisted that only elected officials should occupy local authority positions on LEP boards. The IoD also called for a focus on transport, infrastructure and planning..
The full list of local enterprise partnership proposals is:
- Bexley, Dartford, and Gravesham
- Birmingham and Solihull with East Staffordshire, Lichfield and Tamworth
- Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole
- Brighton and Hove, Croydon, the Gatwick Diamond and West Sussex - Coast to Capital
- Cheshire and Warrington
- County Durham
- Coventry and Warwickshire
- Cumbria
- Devon, Plymouth and Torbay
- East Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and North Essex)
- East Sussex
- Empowering Enterprise - Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly
- Enterprise M3 – Covers parts of Hampshire and Surrey including Andover, Basingstoke, Aldershot, Farnborough, Fleet, Hook and Camberley
- Fylde Coast, Lancashire
- Gatwick Diamond
- Gloucester, Swindon and Wiltshire
- Greater Cambridge & Greater Peterborough
- Greater Lincolnshire
- Greater Manchester
- Hampshire
- Heart of the South West
- Hertfordshire
- Hull, East Riding & Scarborough
- Humber
- Kent and Medway
- Kent-Essex
- Lancashire
- Leeds City Region
- Leicester and Leicestershire
- Liverpool City Region
- Newcastle Gateshead
- Norfolk
- North East
- Northamptonshire
- Northumberland and North Tyneside
- Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, Derby and Derbyshire,
- Oxfordshire City Region
- Pennine Lancashire
- Sheffield City Region
- Solent
- South East Midlands
- South Somerset and East Devon
- South Tyneside and Sunderland
- Stoke-on -Trent and Staffordshire
- Surrey Connects
- Tees Valley
- Thames Valley Berkshire
- Thames Valley Buckinghamshire
- The Black Country
- The Marches Enterprise Partnership – Shropshire and Herefordshire
- The Peel Group – Atlantic Gateway – Liverpool and Manchester
- Visitor Economy Southern England
- West Midlands
- West of England
- Worcestershire
- York and North Yorkshire
Sponsored articles
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Unlocking legal talent
Contracts Lawyer
Senior Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contracts Team
Legal Director - Government and Public Sector
Lawyer (Planning and Regulatory)
Principal Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contract
Locums
Poll






