Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Sponsored articles
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Unlocking legal talent
Sponsored articles
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Unlocking legal talent
- Details
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Julie Bann, Catrin Mills, David Leach and Christian Grierson talk through the upcoming changes to employment law.
Just as you thought you were on top of the employment law changes coming into force in April 2026, the publication of the latest commencement regulations (giving effect to the relevant provisions of the Employment Rights Act 2025) has revealed a last-minute development.
The new statutory duty on employers to keep records of workers’ annual leave and holiday pay will now come into force on 6 April 2026. What’s more, failure to comply will amount to a criminal offence.
Previously, while it is clearly good practice to maintain holiday leave records, there was no legal duty to do so. The Working Time Regulations required employers only to keep records on working time. From 6 April 2026, however, employers are legally obliged to maintain adequate records of annual leave entitlement and pay.
The change had not been flagged in the Government’s roadmap for the implementation of the new Employment Rights Act, leaving employers with less than one working week to get ready.
Adequate Records
Adequate records must document that:
- Workers have been notified of and allowed to take their annual statutory holiday entitlement (5.6 weeks)
- Workers were correctly paid for this leave, including those on irregular hours or part-year workers
- Workers were correctly paid for accrued but untaken leave on termination of employment including any leave carried over from the previous holiday year
Records can be kept in a manner and format that the employer “reasonably thinks fit” but they must be kept for six years.
Failure to comply with this duty will amount to a criminal offence and result in a fine, which could be unlimited. It is expected that enforcement will be by the new Fair Work Agency which will be established on 7 April 2026.
It is understood that the Fair Work Agency will have the power to demand any underpayment uncovered is paid and impose a penalty on top of up to £20,000 per underpaid individual.
What Employers Should Do Now
What you should do now is:
- Audit your holiday and payroll systems to make sure they capture the correct information and that this can be safely retained for six years.
- Immediately implement a clear record‑keeping process if you don’t already have one. Think, if you were asked to produce this information now, could you?
- Consider how you track and ensure that employees are taking their holiday, e.g. are there records of reminders that employees need to book leave? Or, where notice is served for an employee to take holiday, is this documented?
- Review holiday pay calculations to ensure correct payments have been made.
- Ensure your HR and payroll staff, and managers, are trained and up to date on the new requirements.
- Update any relevant policies to reflect new record-keeping practices.
- Prepare for potential Fair Work Agency inspections.
Need Expert Advice?
For further information or advice on any of the April 2026 employment law changes, contact us on
Don’t forget, you can also sign up for our Sharpe Minds webinar series to keep up to date with ERA developments. The remaining sessions can be found here.
Julie Bann and Catrin Mills are Partners, David Leach and Christian Grierson are Senior Associates at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email
|
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD
We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.
|
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
April 16, 2026
Companies House Reform: Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023Companies House has already seen some significant changes to its powers and to the way it operates, and there are further changes ahead. Ryan Copeland and Ruth Crout explain the details.
April 16, 2026
Permission for Take Off: £205m Cardiff Airport Subsidy Authorised by the CATThis week saw the Competition Appeal Tribunal (“CAT”) hand down judgment in the case of Bristol Airport Limited v Welsh Ministers [2026] CAT 30. It’s a subsidy control case of particular interest, as it is the first to interrogate the level of detail required from the assessment…
April 16, 2026
New Regulations for the Use of AI in Court Documents?Fred Groves and Christopher Watkins provide insight into growing judicial concern about accuracy, professional responsibility and the efficient administration of justice in the face of Artificial Intelligence.
April 07, 2026
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369The Dispute Resolution team reacts to the landmark Court of Appeal judgment in CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369.
|
|
OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS
|
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Rachel Murray-Smith Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |















Catherine Newman
