Local Government Lawyer Home Page


Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).

 

                                                                                                  

Slide background

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Icons HazardAlastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.

Just like buses, major planning reforms seem to be coming along in threes in 2021, which is shaping up to be a year of significant change in the planning world. We have already had significant changes to the permitted development regime and there is still potential for a major shake-up in the Planning Bill promised in the Queen’s Speech, though recent press reports suggest this could be watered down significantly due to the strength of opposition. Sandwiched in between the two are recently made revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

The revisions to the NPPF came into force on 20 July 2021, replacing the 2019 version of the NPPF. This is something of a big deal, because since the first version of the NPPF was published in May 2012 it has only been changed twice since.

To accompany the changes, MHCLG has also published the National Model Design Code.

Here is a summary of the main NPPF changes:

- Measures to improve design quality, including a new requirement for Councils to produce local design codes or guides;
- Emphasis on using trees in new developments;
- Adjusting the presumption in favour of sustainable development for plan-makers;
- New limits on the use of Article 4 directions to restrict Permitted Development (‘PD’) rights;
- Councils should ‘retain and explain’ statues rather than remove them; and
- Encouraging faster delivery of public infrastructure, like further education colleges, hospitals and prisons.

The details:

Chapter 2: Achieving Sustainable Development

Paragraph 11 stipulates that all plans should “promote a sustainable pattern of development that seeks to…align growth and infrastructure; improve the environment; mitigate climate change (including by making effective use of land in urban areas) and adapt to its effects.’.

Paragraph 7 refers to the purpose of the planning system making a ‘contribution to the achievement of sustainable development’. The revised version makes additional reference to the 17 Global Goals of Sustainable Development (agreed by the UN in “Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”). Those goals address social progress, economic well-being and environmental protection.

Chapter 3: Plan Making: Long term vision for large scale developments

Paragraph 22 is about long-term vision in strategic plan making. It has been revised so that it now says that ‘where larger scale developments such as new settlements or significant extensions to existing villages and towns form part of the strategy for the area’ policies should be set within a vision of at least 30 years (i.e. further ahead than the usual 15 years) to take into account the likely timescale of delivery. It’s important for planning authorities to note that this change does not affect local plans already published or submitted for examination before 21 July 2021, however, it is acknowledged that it is something that planning inspectors will need to take into account when examining plans published or submitted for examination after 21 July 2021.

Chapter 4: Decision Making: Article 4 directions and PD rights

Article 4 Directions are used by Planning Authorities where they want to remove Permitted Development (PD) rights in a specific area, for example PD rights which allow for residential conversions. Paragraph 53 imposes new limits on the use of Article 4 Directions. Where they relate to changes from non-residential use to residential use, they must be limited to situations where the Direction is necessary to avoid wholly unacceptable adverse impacts, for example the loss of the essential core of a primary shopping area, where that would seriously undermine its vitality and viability. It says that all Article 4 Directions must be based on robust evidence and apply to the smallest area possible. Planning authorities should note that the changes set a higher bar when making Article 4 Directions. The Government has said that existing Article 4 Directions will remain in force during a one year grace period which ends on 31 July 2021 but after that, Planning Authorities must reapply if they wish to secure exemption from the new limitations.

Chapter 8: Promoting Health and Safe Communities: Speeding up delivery of public infrastructure

Paragraph 96 is new. It says that to ensure faster delivery of public service infrastructure such as further education colleges, hospitals, criminal justice accommodation, Planning authorities should work proactively and positively with promoters, delivery partners and statutory bodies to enable key planning issues to be resolved before applications are submitted thereby creating much needed faster delivery.

Chapter 12: Achieving Well-Designed Places: the National Design Guide and Model Design Code and Trees

In paragraphs 127, 128 and 129, reference is now made to neighbourhood planning groups, emphasising that they can play an important role in identifying the special qualities of an area and in explaining how these should be reflected in development ‘both through their own plans and by engaging in the production of design policy, guidance and codes by local planning authorities and developers.’

There is also reference to new responsibilities on local planning authorities to prepare Design Guides and Codes which align with the principles set out in the National Design Guide and National Model Design Code, and which reflect local character and design preferences. Authorities should ensure implementation of these guides and codes. Paragraph 129 provides further information about how these guides and codes can be prepared, whether that be at an area-wide, neighbourhood or site-specific scale.

Paragraph 131 is new. It is about securing tree planting to help mitigate and adapt to climate change. It says that new streets should be tree lined and that opportunities should be taken to incorporate trees elsewhere in developments such as in parks and community orchards.

It also says that appropriate measures should be put in place to secure the long-term maintenance of newly planted trees and that existing trees are retained wherever possible. It says that developers and the Planning Authority should work with highways officers and tree officers to ensure that the right trees are planted in the right places, and solutions are found that are compatible with highways standards and the needs of different users.

Paragraph 134 has been amended to say that development should be refused if it is not well designed, especially where the development fails to reflect local design policies and government guidance on design. It also now highlights that significant weight should be given to development which reflects local design policies and outstanding or innovative designs which promote sustainability.

Chapter 14: Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change: Flood Risk

Both paragraphs 161 and 162 now specifically say that ‘all sources’ of flooding, as well as current and future impacts of climate change, should be taken into account when applying the sequential test.

Previously, the wording only specified ‘flood risk to people and property’. It should also be noted that paragraph 161 says that plans should now not only use opportunities provided by new development to reduce the causes and impacts of flooding but also use ‘improvements in green and other infrastructure’ as well as ‘making as much use as possible of natural flood management techniques as part of an integrated approach to flood risk management.’

There is a change to the tests that must be met under Paragraph 167, in cases where development is proposed in areas at risk of flooding. In the light of any site-specific flood risk assessment and any sequential and exception tests, as applicable), among other things, it must be demonstrated that the development must now be appropriately flood resistance and resilient ‘such that, in the event of a flood, it could be quickly brought back into use without significant refurbishment.’

Annex 3 is new. It is introduced by paragraph 163, which says that if it is not possible for development to be located in areas with a lower risk of flooding (taking into account wider sustainable development objectives), the exception test may have to be applied. The need for the exception test will depend on the potential vulnerability of the site and of the development proposed, in line with the Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification, which is set out in the new Annex 3. It sets out five different heads of flood risk vulnerability for different types of development: Essential Infrastructure, Highly Vulnerable, More Vulnerable, Less Vulnerable and Water-Compatible Development.

Chapter 15: Conserving and Enhancing the Natural Environment: National Parks and AONBs

Paragraph 176 relates to development within National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It creates a new obligation for development within their setting to be ‘sensitively located and designed to avoid or minimise adverse impacts on the designated areas’. The NPPF continues to say (now in Paragraph 177) that permission ‘should be refused for major development’ other than in exceptional circumstances and where it can be demonstrated that the development is in the public interest.

Chapter 16: Conserving and Enhancing the Historic Environment: Statues

Paragraph 198 is new and is probably the item that has caught the public eye more than any of the proposed changes, given recent stories about the proposed removal of various statues of people associated with the slave trade. The paragraph covers applications for the removal or alteration of historic statues, plaques, memorials and monuments (whether listed or not). It says that in considering those applications, Planning Authorities should have regard to the importance of the retention of the statue in situ and of explaining their historic and social context rather than removal.

Chapter 17: Facilitating the Sustainable Use of Minerals

Changes to paragraph 215 show a move away from encouraging certain types of carbon-based fuel exploration and production. It no longer provides that minerals planning authorities should ‘recognise the benefits of on-shore oil and gas development, including unconventional hydrocarbons, for the security of energy supplies and supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy and put in place policies to facilitate their exploration and extraction’ and instead provides that they should ‘when planning for on-shore oil and gas development, clearly distinguish between and plan positively for the three phases of development (exploration, appraisal and production), whilst ensuring appropriate monitoring and site restoration is provided for.’

Summary

So in summary, the number of changes that have been made may not be particularly high, but some of them are of some significance, for example those relating to good design. It will be interesting to see how the revised NPPF will interact with the Planning Bill – once we know what it says, particularly in the light of press reports that the proposals for zoning may not be going ahead after all.

Alastair Lewis is a Partner and Parliamentary Agent and Sarah Wertheim is a Trainee Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.


For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act

FREE DOWNLOAD

LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive

BUY NOW

  More Articles

<a href=

Momentum for Heat Network Roll Out Gathers Pace

Steve Gummer discusses the increased momentum for a Heat Network Rollout.
Icons Hazard

Unconscious Bias, Discrimination and a Warning to Public Sector Employers

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss two employment tribunal judgements, which provide a stark warning to public sector employers about unconscious bias and discrimination.
<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
Icons Court

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
<a href=

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Slide background