- Details
The Procurement Act 2023 (Commencement No. 3) Regulations 2024 – Transitional and Saving Provisions
Regulation 2 – Commencement Date
Regulation 2 means that the majority of the Procurement Act 2023 (the “Act”) not previously commenced by The Procurement Act 2023 (Commencement No. 1 and Saving Provision) Regulations 2024 and The Procurement Act 2023 (Commencement No. 2) Regulations 2024 will be brought into force on 28 October 2024.
Regulation 5 – Saving provisions relating to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015
Regulation 5 sets out that the 2015 (“PCR”) will continue to apply after the PCR is revoked by the Act, subject to certain modifications (discussed below), to procurement procedures, contracts, frameworks, agreements and dynamic purchasing systems (“DPS”), in the following circumstances:
- A sub-central contracting authority has submitted for publication under PCR Regulation 51) a prior information notice as a call for competition (in accordance with PCR Regulation 26(9)), before 26 May 2023.
- Before 28 October 2024, a contracting authority has;
- Awarded the contract, concluded the framework agreement or established the DPS.
- Contacted an economic operator to commence the negotiated procedure without prior publication in cases set out in PCR Regulation 32.
- A contract notice (pursuant to PCR Regulations 26(8) or 75(1)(a) or a contest notice has been submitted for publication in accordance with PCR Regulation 51.
- Published a voluntary transparency notice expressing intention to enter into a contract in accordance with PCR Regulation 99(3)(b).
- Published information about a contract award opportunity on Contracts Finder in accordance with PCR Regulation 110(2).
Where the PCR continues to apply in the circumstances described above, Regulation 5(4) makes certain transitional modifications to the PCR:
- The period of validity of a DPS cannot be changed after 27 October 2025 and will expire at the end of 27 October 2028. References to ‘every financial year’ in PCR Regulation 113(7)(a) (relating to the publication of compliance with prompt payment requirements) will be amended to refer instead to a period beginning on 28 October 2024 and ending 31 March 2025, with subsequent periods being six months.
Regulation 6 – Transitional provisions relating to repeat services or works supplied under a contract awarded under the PCR
Regulation 6 is a transitional provision that addresses PCR Reg 32(9). Regulation 6 states that a contracting authority may award a public contract directly under s.41 of the Act (direct award in special cases) where:
- a public contract concerns the supply of services or works by the existing supplier that are similar to existing services or works; and
- the existing services or works were supplied under a public contract or framework agreement that was award in accordance with the PCR.
Where applying s.41 of the Act in the above circumstances, Regulation 6 amends paragraph 8 of Schedule 5 of the Act to read as follows:
‘8 The public contract concerns the supply of services or works by the existing supplier that are similar to existing services or works where—
- the existing, services or works were supplied under a public contract that was awarded in accordance with regulation 26(1) and (2) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 within the period of five years ending with the day on which the transparency notice is published, and
- there was a disclosure as soon as that earlier contract was put up for tender that met the requirements of regulation 32(11) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.
The focus of this article has been the implications of the Regulations on the PCR, but for contracting authorities and utilities procuring under the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011, the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 and the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016, it is important to note that the Regulations make similar savings and transitional amendments to those regimes as to the PCR.
Juli Lau is a Partner and Clarice Harper-Smith is a Trainee Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email
|
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD
We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.
|
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
August 21, 2026
Reforms to the NSIP Regime (and Beyond…)James Goldthorpe, Emyr Thomas and Alastair Lewis set out where the government’s Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (“NSIPs”) reforms have reached, the implications of the changes made to date and how the latest consultation “beyond NSIPS” could allow the government…
August 20, 2026
Local Government Reorganisation: Governance frameworksIs your governance framework ready for vesting day? Peter Collins examines the importance of early planning. When councils think about Local Government Reorganisation, governance is often viewed through the lens of the new authority. Constitutions are reviewed, committee…
August 20, 2026
Local Government Reorganisation and corporate structuresIn the first in a five-part series on local government reorganisation, Peter Collins explains why councils should start with their corporate structures. When local government reorganisation is discussed, the conversation naturally gravitates towards the big-ticket issues.…
August 04, 2026
High Court Orders Government to Pay Costs Following Free Speech Union Judicial ReviewGeorge McLellan and Olly Dickie share an update on Sharpe Pritchard's successful representation of the Free Speech Union, with the court ordering the Education Secretary to pay the costs of a judicial review.
|
|
OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS
|
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Rachel Murray-Smith Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Jo Pickering Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Emyr Thomas Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Gemma Duncan Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Simon Kiely Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||





Catherine Newman




