- Details
Energy Price Caps and a Cost-Plus Revenue Limit
Steve Gummer discusses the new Energy Prices Bill, which includes energy price caps and a cost-plus revenue limit.![]()
On 12 October the Government introduced into Parliament the Energy Prices Bill. The draft can be found here. The Bill is being “fast-tracked” through Parliament. This is to ensure households and businesses receive the benefits in their bills asap.
Things we knew about before
Some of what the Bill does has been well publicised.
For households, there is the creation of the Energy Price Guarantee for electricity and gas. This will reduce the unit cost of electricity and gas for end users.
For businesses, there is a scheme to reduce the amount non-domestic customers would be charged for gas and electricity and reimburse suppliers. This is the Energy Bill Relief Scheme.
There is also protection for those alternative fuel consumers – i.e. those on a heat network. This is the Alternative Fuel Payment. It is available for domestic and non-domestic customers.
It is important to note the Bill also contains obligations on intermediaries i.e. private landlords to pass through benefits re savings to end users.
Some surprises… a cap on revenues for renewables
Some of what the Bill does was not so expected… The Bill creates powers for the Government to introduce a “Cost Plus Revenue Limit” for low carbon generators.
What is this? It is effectively a temporary revenue limit on low carbon generators. Electricity prices achieved by generators in the UK are set by the price charged by the most expensive, or marginal, source of energy for generation. At present the most expensive source of energy for generation is gas. Currently gas prices are significantly inflated in the UK in light of global energy prices. However, there is no reason low carbon generators operating in the market should charge prices based on inflated gas prices. Low carbon generators will likely have lower operating costs but will still benefit from the high price in the wholesale market.
The exact scope of the Cost Plus Revenue Limit remains unclear and subject to consultation. However, this is not a windfall tax. It does not apply to profits. It is a revenue cap – the intention appears to be that the new cap will allow generators to recover costs as well as costs a return linked to investment and risk profile. We understand this is due to kick in in March 2023.
The challenges of a revenue cap are immediately obvious. Questions arise such as:
- Where to set appropriate returns and whether to do this by project or by technology. It will be important that this cap does not artificially distort the market as between renewable technologies.
- Revenue caps will presumably have to be set on a unit basis but how will this be calculated.
- How to deal with revenue sharing mechanisms outside of the CfD e.g. Energy from Waste Plants built under PFI already have third party revenue sharing mechanisms.
- The cap is stated to be temporary but how temporary is temporary?
- How will the cap take into account actual cost – for example if a person constructed a wind farm and costs overran, is the cost overrun factored into the cap.
- How to ensure this does not act as a deterrent to constructing renewable generation.
- How will this interact with those generators on a CfD – who are incentivised to achieve “market price” but will forego the difference between “market price” and their subsidised “strike price”.
- Questions regarding the equity of capping revenues for renewable generators but not gas wholesalers (as opposed to generators).
None of this is to say the Cost Plus Revenue Limit is wrong. The Government is correct that the link between gas prices and renewable prices should be severed. The key challenge is the how. The consultation is forthcoming.
Steve Gummer is a Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email
|
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD
We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.
|
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
April 30, 2026
The Meaning and Application of “Freedom of Speech” Within the LawGeorge McLellan and Olivia Dawson represented the Free Speech Union in intervening to present written submissions to the Court concerning the meaning and application of “freedom of speech within the law”.
April 30, 2026
High Court Rules on the Service of Local Authority Decision Notices by EmailThe High Court has confirmed that email service of statutory notices and decisions by local authorities is valid and effective on delivery, irrespective of whether the email is seen by the person concerned. Chloe McQuillan, Olivia Peake, and Amy Dann explain what you need to…
April 24, 2026
Post award modifications: Analysis of the “Modifications Claim” in TNLC v The Gambling Commission [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)Nicola Sumner and Beatrice Wood consider the recent judgment which included claims in relation to the conduct of the procurement process (the “Process Claim”) and a challenge to post award modifications made to the Fourth UK National Lottery Licence (the “Modifications Claim”).
April 24, 2026
Separation of Powers in Wales: Is there a duty to consult before introducing a Bill into the Senedd Cymru?Oliver Dickie and Olivia Peake consider the judgment in R (The Greyhound Board of Great Britain Limited) v The Welsh Ministers [2026] EWHC 670 (Admin).
|
|
OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS
|
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Rachel Murray-Smith Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Jo Pickering Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Emyr Thomas Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Gemma Duncan Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Simon Kiely Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||








Catherine Newman




