- Details
Government issues response to the UK ETS expansion to waste
Natasha Barlow provides insight into the Government's response to the UK Emissions Trading Scheme consultation.![]()
The government has this week issued a long-awaited interim response to the consultation relating to the expansion of the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) to the waste sector. The intention is that energy from waste (EfW) and waste incineration facilities will enter the UK ETS fully from 2028, when operators will be obliged to acquire and surrender carbon allowances for their fossil-derived CO2 emissions.
The key takeaway from the government’s interim response is that a voluntary MRV (monitoring, reporting and verification) period will commence from January 2026. In scope are combustion and process emissions from EfW and waste incineration processes, including advanced thermal treatments and advanced conversion technologies. During this period, operators will not be required to obtain carbon allowances, nor will there be any penalties for failure to participate.
The threshold for inclusion is based on the small waste incinerator plant throughput, meaning that facilities processing three tonnes an hour or more of non-hazardous waste, or 10 tonnes a day or more of hazardous waste, can participate in the MRV period. Clinical waste incinerators, HSE (Hospital and Small Emitter) and USE (Ultra-Small Emitter) are all in scope.
High temperature incinerators that deal primarily with hazardous waste are, however, out of scope. This is in response to respondents’ concerns that there are no alternatives to the incineration of certain hazardous waste types, including POPs, and therefore it is not possible to decarbonise. Further, there were concerns that the inclusion of hazardous waste would encourage export, particularly given the EU ETS exemptions.
Responses to the consultation showed concern across local authorities and the waste industry about landfill or export of waste becoming a cheaper option. While the majority of respondents did not support the extension of UK ETS to landfill, there was acknowledgement that measures (e.g. increasing landfill tax) need to be taken to stop this becoming a more cost-efficient option.
As expected, the responses to the consultation illustrate local authorities’ concerns that the cost of UK ETS will be directly passed through. There is a general recognition in the government’s response of the financial burden on local authorities, and further assurances that packaging extended producer responsibility (pEPR) will help to mitigate the cost of incinerating packaging materials. However, the response falls short of confirming any measures or funding to support local authorities to manage the significant cost impact of UK ETS.
In order to monitor emissions, the government intends to use an integrated method using analysis of carbon-14 and emissions factors, and we are informed that the government will issue guidance by the end of 2025 about how to participate in the MRV period. The detailed methodology of how emissions will be measured for the purposes of allowances is not yet clear, however, and local authorities will no doubt remain concerned about the practicalities of installing any measurement equipment and related budgeting.
Given the remaining uncertainty, we would encourage local authorities and EfW operators to take the following steps:
- Participate in the voluntary MRV period to help understand your emissions and future exposure to UK ETS. Data will also help to drive the development of further policy.
- Review and, where necessary, amend waste management contracts to address forthcoming carbon costs.
- Budget now for the anticipated costs of UK ETS from 2028, and explore measures to reduce fossil carbon content in waste streams.
Natasha Barlow is an Associate at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email
|
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD
We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.
|
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES
April 30, 2026
The meaning and application of “freedom of speech” within the lawGeorge McLellan and Olivia Dawson represented the Free Speech Union in intervening to present written submissions to the Court concerning the meaning and application of “freedom of speech within the law”.
April 30, 2026
High Court rules on the service of local authority decision notices by emailThe High Court has confirmed that email service of statutory notices and decisions by local authorities is valid and effective on delivery, irrespective of whether the email is seen by the person concerned. Chloe McQuillan, Olivia Peake, and Amy Dann explain what you need to…
April 24, 2026
Post award modifications: Analysis of the “Modifications Claim” in TNLC v The Gambling Commission [2026] EWHC 891 (TCC)Nicola Sumner and Beatrice Wood consider the recent judgment which included claims in relation to the conduct of the procurement process (the “Process Claim”) and a challenge to post award modifications made to the Fourth UK National Lottery Licence (the “Modifications Claim”).
April 24, 2026
Separation of Powers in Wales: Is there a duty to consult before introducing a Bill into the Senedd Cymru?Oliver Dickie and Olivia Peake consider the judgment in R (The Greyhound Board of Great Britain Limited) v The Welsh Ministers [2026] EWHC 670 (Admin).
|
|
OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS
|
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Rachel Murray-Smith Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Jo Pickering Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Emyr Thomas Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Gemma Duncan Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
|
||
|
Simon Kiely Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||








Catherine Newman




