Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Managing new enforcement powers for councils under the Traffic Management Act 2004

Icons Court

Rob Hann considers the recent legislative changes to traffic management in England, including the introduction of Clean Air Zones and widening local authorities enforcement powers for moving traffic offences.

Clean Air Zones

The adoption of a CAZ in major cities forms part of a major Government initiative to reduce carbon emissions caused by traffic congestion and exhaust fumes. Whether charges apply to the particular vehicle you happen to be driving depends on the type of CAZ introduced in that area.

Charging in a CAZ falls under four Classes – Class A, B, C and D.

  • Class A – covers buses, coaches and taxi.
  • Class B – effects buses, coaches, taxis, private hire vehicles and heavy goods vehicles.
  • Class C – covers buses, coaches, taxis, private hire vehicles, heavy goods vehicles, vans and minibuses.
  • Class D – is all encompassing and includes buses, coaches, taxis, private hire vehicles, heavy goods vehicles, vans, minibuses and domestic cars, plus the local authority has the option to include motorcycles.

Urgent Action Required

There is no doubt that urgent action is needed to clean up the air we breathe. The Royal College of Physicians estimates that 40,000 deaths can be attributed to exposure to outdoor pollution. It has been linked to cancer, asthma, strokes, heart disease, diabetes, obesity and dementia. Government ministers were ordered by the Supreme Court to introduce measures designed to tackle the amount of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the air. It is hoped the use of a CAZ in a city will form a key part of that response. However, it is questionable whether a CAZ is really going to be that effective in reducing carbon emissions and achieving better air quality?

Whilst some local authorities (e.g. Bath, Birmingham, Greater Manchester, Leeds) have embraced the CAZ concept, others have chosen alternative approaches.  Many local authorities fear that a charging CAZ may deter visitors and tourists, at a time when Councils are seeking to entice people back into city centres to help rebuild local economies. The risk of local opposition to a charging CAZ is high, with people directly affected likely to resent having to pay a new tax. The fear is such opposition could translate to the ballot box, as local aggrieved motorists are also likely to become local aggrieved voters.

This perhaps demonstrates the horns of a dilemma faced by councils as they struggle to address different but connected priorities. The recovery and regeneration of the local economy on the one hand and the improvement of air quality through reduced traffic on the other.

Moving Traffic Offences

To this heady mix is now added another set of major changes, as the Government ponders the possibility of passing on responsibility for the enforcement of (certain) moving traffic offences in England to the relevant local authority for the area. Local authorities across England would gain the power to issue penalty charge notices for decriminalised offences such as straying into a restricted route, stopping in a yellow box junction or performing a prohibited turn.

Several recent articles warn of dire consequences for motorists if this should come to pass and point to the fact that such schemes have already been introduced in London and Cardiff which have netted a total of over £58m in fines in only one year. The fear is, should these powers be extended across England to 300 or so local authorities, those local authorities could get carried away with their new-found enforcement powers. There may be a perception that the local authorities are seeking to exploit their powers to ‘fleece’, any poor, unsuspecting driver who happen to be blundering past.

Baroness Vere of Norbiton the Transport Minister recently suggested new powers could be introduced as early as December 2021 and (like the CAZ) they are designed to help councils prioritise cycling, reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality. In fact, primary legislation already exists to make this happen – contained in the Traffic Management Act 2004 ‘(the TMA 2004’). In Part 6, S.73 specifies that the offences listed at Schedule 7 can be made subject to civil enforcement. However, it has yet to happen anywhere in England. In London, decriminalisation came about as a result of an Act of Parliament which Sharpe Pritchard promoted for the London Borough Councils and TfL (the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003).

Secondary legislation would be needed to implement the powers on a wider basis, and the government would need to start consulting on it soon in order to meet a December 2021 implementation date.

Managing the Changes

With new powers come new responsibilities and the local authorities considering the adoption and use of these new powers should address the following questions.

  • Will they be able to develop appropriate transport strategies to take account of the impact of these powers that will satisfy central government they are ready to take on the new responsibilities?
  • Do they have, or can they procure in time the sophisticated equipment, cameras, ITC to make enforcement work efficiently?
  • Can they engage and train up staff in good time to undertake these new functions? Will they have to fund this investment before taking on the new powers and receiving any income from penalty charges and fines?
  • Will they be able to keep all of the proceeds from enforcement in terms of fines and penalties, and if so, will they be required to use them for limited purposes (in London, penalty charge income must be used for transport-related expenditure before in the first instance)?
  • What discretion (if any) will there be to decide not to impose penalties in particular circumstances and how will such discretions be applied across all LA regions?
  • What will the view of the police be?

As is to be expected, the LGA are lobbying hard for the new powers to be made available to their members and have previously conducted research showing their members would consider using the new powers. Several councils are already gearing up to take these new responsibilities on and so big changes to traffic management are ahead.

Sharpe Pritchard can prepare bespoke training and advice to aid local authorities in managing these powers. A free introductory webinar on the topic is likely to be scheduled in the Autumn ahead of the December 2021 changes.

Sharpe Pritchard is well placed to advise on all manner of issues related to the new traffic management powers and adoption of Clean Air Zones.  If you have any queries in relation to this article you can This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Rob Hann was head of legal at 4ps/Local Partnerships between 1996 and 2016 and (amongst other things) he helped develop and deliver the roll out of the PFI across local government including templates, model form sector specific contracts and the local government input to SoPC. He is now Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard. He can be contacted at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
Icons Hazard

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Alastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
Icons Court

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
<a href=

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Icons Court

Climate emergency or climate catastrophe?

Rob Hann asks how central & local government departments and councils can work together more effectively to combat the challenges to achieve net zero by 2050.
Slide background