Standish 18 months on
Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.
About the speakers
|
Paul Pavlou MCIArb A senior barrister specialising in all areas of family law, with particular expertise in complex financial remedy proceedings and children cases, both public and private law. Experienced in high-value matrimonial finance disputes, and cross-jurisdictional issues. In addition to a busy practice, Paul sits as an arbitrator and private FDR judge, bringing a balanced, pragmatic and settlement-focused approach to dispute resolution. |
Anne Hogarth Anne was called to the bar in 2018. She completed pupillage and was a tenant at Fenners Chambers, practicing primarily in Family, Property, Housing and Commercial Law. She has previously also practiced in public child, probate, insolvency and crime giving her a wealth of common law experiences to draw upon in both her legal knowledge and advocacy skills. |
Latest Webinars
Sharpe Five Podcast - Episode 1: Understanding Access Injunctions
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: R (FG) v Kensington and Chelsea
Placements of children in Scotland – implementation of the new law
The End of the Acid Test: What Every Advocate and Health & Social Care Professional Needs to Know
AI Can See Clearly Now 2026
Worth Your Data in Gold
Climate Law Matters: Live
Turning Tensions into Trust: A New Mediatory Approach to Party Walls, Rights of Light and other Neighbour Conflicts
Supreme Court judgment: After Cheshire West – Transitions from Care to COP


