The “highly likely” test under s.31(2A) of the Senior Courts Act
Public law case update Q3 2025
Kinship care – latest developments
Roll up, roll up
Proposed changes to the consumer standards
The Employment Rights Act 2025 – Breakdown of Key Dates
Renters’ Rights Act 2025: What’s new for private sector housing enforcement?
HMOs and “self-contained flats”
What impact will the Renters’ Rights Act have on homelessness?
Only or Principal Home…again
Defending Age Assessment Challenges: A Guide for Local Authorities
Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Providence Building Services Limited v Hexagon Housing Association Limited – The case for a stay
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Government consults on statutory code to crack down on “fire and rehire” practices
- Details
The Government has unveiled a “crackdown” on controversial dismissal and re-engagement tactics through a planned statutory code of practice.
A consultation will run for the next 12 weeks to invite views from the public and other interested groups on a new statutory code of practice for dismissal and re-engagement, also known as “fire and rehire”.
‘Fire and rehire’ refers to when an employer fires an employee and offers them a new contract on new, often less-favourable terms.
The planned statutory code, subject to a consultation, will make it “explicitly clear to employers that they must not use threats of dismissal to pressurise employees into accepting new terms”, and that they should have “honest and open-minded discussions with their employees and representatives”, the Government said.
The Code is issued under section 203(1)(a) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The new statutory code of practice will set out employers’ responsibilities when seeking to change contractual terms and conditions of employment, including that businesses must consult with employees in a “fair and transparent way” when proposing changes to their employment terms.
Once in force, Courts and Employment Tribunals will be able to take the code into account when considering relevant cases, including unfair dismissal.
The Courts will be given power to apply a 25% uplift to an employee’s compensation in certain circumstances if an employer is found to have not complied with the statutory code.
Business Secretary Grant Shapps said: “Using fire and rehire as a negotiation tactic is a quick-fire way to damage your reputation as a business. Our new code will crack down on firms mistreating employees and set out how they should behave when changing an employee’s contract.
“We are determined to do all we can to protect and enhance workers’ rights across the country.”
In March 2022, ferry operator P&O fired 786 workers and then rehired cheaper agency workers. The Government notes that the company did this “without due consultation” and without informing the Business Secretary at the time, “failing to follow best practice”.
It was following this event that Grant Shapps, as Transport Secretary at the time, introduced a 9-point plan including primary legislation to tackle these issues.
Individuals or groups with an interest can take part in the consultation: Draft Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement. The consultation closes on 18 April 2023.
Lottie Winson





