Local Government Lawyer Banner Hi res

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1


The Local Government Association (LGA) has called on the Government and the Sentencing Council to review sentencing guidelines for fly-tipping urgently, after new figures show that offenders prosecuted through the courts are often fined less than the penalties councils can issue directly.

Councils warned that sentencing guidelines are now “out of step” with the real impact of fly-tipping on communities, the environment and public finances, and that “tougher penalties” are needed to deter repeat and organised offenders.

In 2024/25, councils in England dealt with 1.26 million fly-tipping incidents.

According to the LGA, analysis of the latest fly-tipping data shows that the average court fine for fly-tipping is £539, which is £87 lower than the £626 average fixed penalty notice (FPN) councils can issue for the same offence.

The LGA noted that while councils are taking increasing enforcement action against offenders, taking cases to court often requires “lengthy investigations, high evidential thresholds and significant staff time”.

It added: “Despite this, sentencing outcomes frequently fail to reflect the seriousness of the offence or the public cost involved.”

Giving examples, the LGA noted that in York, two offenders were each fined £300 by magistrates for waste offences, despite Fixed Penalty Notices of £600 and £1,000 being issued.

Meanwhile, in Wiltshire, a fly-tipper who failed to pay a £1,000 fixed penalty notice was fined just £80 when the case was brought to court.

Cllr Arooj Shah, Chair of the LGA Neighbourhoods Committee, said: “Fly-tipping is criminal activity that blights communities and costs taxpayers millions of pounds every year.

“Councils are working hard to investigate and prosecute offenders, but when court fines are lower than fixed penalties, it undermines enforcement and fails to act as a deterrent.

“Sentencing guidelines must be reviewed so that the punishment fits the crime and reflects both the harm caused and the significant work undertaken by enforcement officers.”

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been approached for comment.

Lottie Winson

Must read

LGL Red line

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Click here to view our archived articles or search below.

ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD

Sharpe Light Blue Bar 435px

We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector.

Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms.

All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.

Justin Mendelle signature

OUR NEXT EVENT

Sharpe Light Blue Bar 435px

SharpeEdge Event Slide

OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS

Sharpe Light Blue Bar 435px

Slide backgroundSlide thumbnail
Slide backgroundSlide thumbnail
Slide backgroundSlide thumbnail

OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS

Sharpe Light Blue Bar 435px

Peter CollinsPeter Collins

Partner

020 7406 4600

Contact by email

Find out more
 

Catherine NewmanCatherine Newman

Partner

020 7406 4600

Contact by email

Find out more
 

Rachel Murray-Smith

Rachel Murray-Smith

Partner

020 7406 4600

Contact by email

Find out more

Directory