The “highly likely” test under s.31(2A) of the Senior Courts Act
Public law case update Q3 2025
Kinship care – latest developments
Roll up, roll up
Proposed changes to the consumer standards
The Employment Rights Act 2025 – Breakdown of Key Dates
Renters’ Rights Act 2025: What’s new for private sector housing enforcement?
HMOs and “self-contained flats”
What impact will the Renters’ Rights Act have on homelessness?
Only or Principal Home…again
Defending Age Assessment Challenges: A Guide for Local Authorities
Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Providence Building Services Limited v Hexagon Housing Association Limited – The case for a stay
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Sentencing Bill risks confusion over councillor disqualification: LGA
- Details
The new Sentencing Bill 2025 could risk confusing candidates, councillors and the public about when a council member is disqualified from public office, the Local Government Association (LGA) has warned.
The bill - which was introduced to Parliament earlier this month (2 September) - aims to, among other things, introduce a presumption to suspend custodial sentences of 12 months or less.
The provision intends to reduce overcrowding by cutting down on the number of people serving short prison sentences.
"Legally, this change does not impact the councillor disqualification criteria, as disqualification applies whether a custodial sentence is served or suspended," the LGA said.
It added: "However, if suspended sentences are used more regularly, there is a risk of confusion by candidates, councils and the public."
The Sentencing Bill does not amend any of the laws on councillor disqualification, which are set out in the Local Government Act 1972 as amended by the Local Government (Disqualification) Act 2022.
Under the current legislation grounds for disqualification include a custodial sentence of three months or more, including a suspended sentence, without the option of a fine within the last five years, bankruptcy restrictions, corrupt/illegal electoral practices, and being subject to sexual offence notification requirements or orders.
In its response, the LGA said: "The Bill [...] intends to bring in a presumption to suspend custodial sentences of 12 months or less, rather than serving a short-term imprisonment.
"Legally, this change does not impact the councillor disqualification criteria, as disqualification applies whether a custodial sentence is served or suspended.
“However, if suspended sentences are used more regularly, there is a risk of confusion by candidates, councils and the public."
It noted that candidates at elections must confirm that they are not disqualified for any reason, "but the use of suspended sentences could create confusion amongst candidates, agents, councillors, officers from whom they may seek advice as to whether they are or are not disqualified, and the public, as disqualification criteria is already complex".
Confusion may be exacerbated by the proposal to use additional community sentences alongside suspended sentences, as community sentences are not referred to in the disqualification legislation, the LGA added.
To address its concerns, the LGA called on the Government to consider issuing guidance on disqualification for candidates, agents and officers to provide "absolute clarity" on when an individual is or is not disqualified from public office.
The Sentencing Bill has its second reading in the House of Commons last week. The date for its next stage - consideration by a House of Commons committee - is yet to be announced.
Adam Carey
Deputy Director Legal and Democratic Services
Legal Director - Government and Public Sector
Locums
Poll





