Local Government Lawyer

London Borough of Tower Hamlets Vacancies

Government Legal Department Vacancies


The Welsh Government’s provisional 2026-27 local government settlement “does not come close to matching the unprecedented financial pressures facing councils across Wales”, leaders have warned.

In a written statement issued yesterday, Jayne Bryant MS, Cabinet Secretary for Housing and Local Government, announced yesterday that the provisional settlement would provide £6.4bn from the Welsh Government Revenue Support Grant (RSG) and Non-Domestic Rates (NDR) to spend on delivering key services.

“This is an average increase of 2.7% on a like-for-like basis and includes an additional £5.5m (on top of the £8.6m allocated at draft budget) to ensure no authority receives an increase of less than 2.3%,” Bryant said.

She added that the baseline funding of £244m for the Council Tax Reduction Scheme would continue to be maintained.

Bryant also published indicative information on specific revenue and capital grants planned for 2026-27.

At this provisional stage these grants amount to more than £1.3bn for revenue and more than £1.08bn for capital, she said.

In response to the announcement, the Welsh Local Government Association issued a statement welcoming the settlement and including reactions from the various group leaders.

Cllr Andrew Morgan, WLGA Labour Group Leader, said: “While we now need to go through the figures in detail, this draft settlement offers a degree of stability at a time when local services are under sustained pressure. The average increase shows that Welsh Government recognises the strain councils are facing. 

“But stability doesn’t remove the pressures themselves. Social care, homelessness, education and workforce costs continue to rise faster than resources can keep up. Councils will still need to make tough choices, and that remains a concern. 

“We will continue to work constructively with Welsh Government over the coming weeks on budget talks, as we have been clear that additional funding to increase the final settlement will be required to help protect and maintain services. Our shared goal is to maintain the essential services people rely on every day, and to do so in a way that is fair and sustainable in the long term.” 

Cllr Mark Pritchard, WLGA Independent Group Leader, said: “I urge Welsh Government to look again at the reality facing councils and to increase the final settlement. Without additional support, the strain on councils to deliver essential services to the public will become untenable. The pressures on council workforces will only get worse and redundancies will be inevitable.” 

Cllr Gary Pritchard, WLGA Plaid Cymru Group Leader, meanwhile said: “Local government has been warning for some time that the pressure on core services is now structural, not temporary. This increase simply doesn’t keep pace with the underlying forces driving demand. 

“Many councils are already operating at the limits of what is safe or sustainable. Even with a funding floor, the gap between need and resource continues to widen, and that poses real risks for the resilience of services, especially in rural areas. The funding formula really needs to be reformed. 

“We need to see a final settlement that genuinely reflects the pressures councils face, alongside clarity on how wider cost increases will be supported. Without that, local authorities across Wales will remain on very uncertain ground.” 

Cllr Jake Berriman, WLGA Liberal Democrat Group Leader, said: “Councils are working hard to protect services, but demand is rising far faster than resources, particularly in social care and services for vulnerable residents. This settlement will still leave many authorities struggling to keep pace with that demand. 

“It’s also important to recognise that every community faces different challenges. Rural and semi-rural areas deal with higher delivery costs and geographic pressures that a flat percentage uplift simply doesn’t reflect. 

“I look forward to continuing discussions with Welsh Government during the consultation period. Communities need a settlement that acknowledges the real pressures on the ground and gives councils a fair chance to plan ahead.” 

Poll