Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1


Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Must read

LGL Red line

A local authority and a refurbishment company have been fined for a “simply unacceptable” incident where three men were exposed to asbestos during work on a school.

Birmingham City Council had contracted Solihull Supplies Ltd, of Lodge Road, Knowle, to refurbish the reception area at William Cowper Community Primary School, Newtown, Birmingham.

Solihull Supplies then sub-contracted another firm – which cannot be named as legal proceedings are still ongoing – to remove ceiling tiles at the school without carrying out a proper risk assessment.

On 24 July 2009 two workers from the firm were tasked with stripping out tiles from seven rooms being refurbished.

However, a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found the tiles contained brown asbestos and the work lasted several hours, exposing both workers and the school caretaker to asbestos.

Also, rather than use a cleaner with a specialised filter, an ordinary vacuum cleaner was used which would have spread fibres into the air.

The HSE told Birmingham Magistrates’ Court that the subcontractor firm did not have a licence to undertake work with asbestos, had no knowledge of how to deal with asbestos and had given its employees no training in dealing with the substance.

Birmingham City Council pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £5,000 and ordered to pay £1,091 costs.

Solihull Supplies pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 6(1)(a) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 and was fined £1,750 and ordered to pay £1,091 costs.

HSE Principal Inspector Jo Anderson said after the hearing: "Because of the failing of the council and the firms involved, three people now have to live with the knowledge they may become ill from lung disease in the future.

"The long term health risks associated with exposure to asbestos dust are well known and it is simply unacceptable for incidents such as this to still be taking place. This was an entirely preventable incident which could have been avoided if those involved had assessed the situation properly and taken the necessary precautions."

A local authority and a refurbishment company have been fined for a “simply unacceptable” incident where three men were exposed to asbestos during work on a school.

Birmingham City Council had contracted Solihull Supplies Ltd, of Lodge Road, Knowle, to refurbish the reception area at William Cowper Community Primary School, Newtown, Birmingham.

Solihull Supplies then sub-contracted another firm – which cannot be named as legal proceedings are still ongoing – to remove ceiling tiles at the school without carrying out a proper risk assessment.

On 24 July 2009 two workers from the firm were tasked with stripping out tiles from seven rooms being refurbished.

However, a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found the tiles contained brown asbestos and the work lasted several hours, exposing both workers and the school caretaker to asbestos.

Also, rather than use a cleaner with a specialised filter, an ordinary vacuum cleaner was used which would have spread fibres into the air.

The HSE told Birmingham Magistrates’ Court that the subcontractor firm did not have a licence to undertake work with asbestos, had no knowledge of how to deal with asbestos and had given its employees no training in dealing with the substance.

Birmingham City Council pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 and was fined £5,000 and ordered to pay £1,091 costs.

Solihull Supplies pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 6(1)(a) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 and was fined £1,750 and ordered to pay £1,091 costs.

HSE Principal Inspector Jo Anderson said after the hearing: "Because of the failing of the council and the firms involved, three people now have to live with the knowledge they may become ill from lung disease in the future.

"The long term health risks associated with exposure to asbestos dust are well known and it is simply unacceptable for incidents such as this to still be taking place. This was an entirely preventable incident which could have been avoided if those involved had assessed the situation properly and taken the necessary precautions."

Jobs

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Events

Directory