Law Society, Bar Council and others judicial review of hikes to court fees

The grounds for the challenge are:

• The proposals “would be tantamount to 'selling justice' contrary to the principles of Magna Carta”.
• The Government does not have the power to raise fees for the purposes it has stated in the consultation - to make 'departmental savings'.
• The Government is proceeding “without evidence to justify the increases, which are effectively a tax”.
• Consultees were not told how much money needed to be raised from enhanced fees or why – “this is a breach of the Government's own consultation principles, which state that sufficient reasons must be given for any proposal to permit intelligent consideration and response".
• When the Government tabled its second round of proposals on higher fees for possession claims and general civil applications, “it had already made up its mind about certain options, which is unfair”.
• The Government failed to allow representations on enhanced fees in combination with amendments to the remissions scheme.

The signatories to the letter to the Lord Chancellor include: the Law Society, the Bar Council; CILEx; the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL); the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL); the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS); the Chancery Bar Association; Action Against Medical Accidents (AvMA); and the Commercial Bar Association (COMBAR).

The Law Society said it had asked the Government to provide information on how much money it proposed to raise through enhanced fees and what it would spend the money on.

Chancery Lane has also asked the Government to explain how modernisation of the court services will appear in the Government's accounts.

Law Society president Andrew Caplen said: “The Government's policy on 'enhanced court fees' amounts to a flat tax on those seeking justice.

“The government's hikes - due to come in from April - will price the public out of the courts and leave small businesses saddled with debts they are due but unable to afford to recover.”