Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Newsletter registration
Injunctions to restrain breaches of planning control
Who bears the burden?
Lawfulness and applications for a CLEUD
The OIA’s 2026 operating plan: What universities need to know
The Cardiff Airport subsidy control ruling
White Paper on SEN reforms: some lessons from the current Welsh SEN system
Greyhound racing and the separation of powers
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369
The Hillsborough Law Bill: implications for public bodies
Dispensing with notice to father
Court of Protection case update April 2026
The new PD27A: a step change in Family Court bundle and document management
Déjà Vu – the implications of Zenobē Energy’s latest case for local government
The ERA – Benefits and Working Conditions
£150m Clean Maritime Grant Competition Opens – Critical Subsidy Control Steps for Applicants
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Why I Wanted to Explore Intensity of Review Across the UK and New Zealand
Asylum hotels, overcrowding and the HMO rules
Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
Intentional homelessness and tenancies obtained by false statement
Defective but not fatal
Self-grants of planning permission, functional separation and demolition avoidance
The lawfulness of emailing licensing decision notices
Intervention: the Monitoring Officer’s view
The role of the backbench councillor
FOI and information held on computer systems
Sentencing guidelines for HSE offences and public bodies
Correcting mistakes in public decision making
The Supreme Court on termination of JCT contracts
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 - what it means for local authorities
DOLS and Under 16s: Insights from Medway Council v A Father
The Local Power Plan: Putting Clean Power in Communities’ Hands
The powers of exclusion panels
Removal from kinship care
When school discipline meets disability
Navigating the expansion of foster care
Personal welfare deputies – Lawson and Mottram strikes back?
No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Adoption vs long-term fostering
Evolution of the academy trust and maintained school landscape
Care leavers and redaction of records
“Unusual facts and procedural irregularities”
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
Land value and the principle of reality
The latest Sizewell C JR
Impecuniosity and other issues in credit hire claims
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance Teams
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy Routes
Disclosure to the DBS
The CAT and the New Lottery Subsidy Control challenge
Gender-questioning children under draft KCSIE 2026
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The convergence of DRS, Simpler Recycling and EPR
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 Order
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy Control
Make Europe Build Again – The EU Industrial Accelerator Act
Affordable housing funding news & unlocking S106 units
The Social and Affordable Housing Programme 2026–2036: new guidance
Housing case alert - February 2026
Residential developments: new section 106 delivery roadmap
The Renters Rights Act and social landlords
Assured tenancies: written statements and information sheets
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On - How procurement processes are evolving
Book review: “Reforming lessons”
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Mobile phones, AI and schools
Transparency in FII cases
Court documents and AI
Next steps for the LGPS after the access and fairness consultation
What is an Officer?
The High Court on the EHRC’s “interim update”
Substituted decision notices and contempt of court
Social media guidance for members
2026 in construction: a look ahead
Track allocation in housing disrepair claims
Withdrawing applications for care orders
Appropriate professional boundaries for teachers
Children under 16 and deprivation of liberty
A Welsh white leopard?
Conversion to an ‘empty’ MAT
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Enterprise culture
- Details
The improvement of SMEs’ access to procurement opportunities is high on the agenda of both the Government and Brussels. But are contracting authorities listening?
Elizabeth Cooper looks at the latest developments
Gaining better access to opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is not a new issue for contracting authorities in the UK. With competition to win public sector business increasing and the desire to boost economic growth running parallel with ever increasing complexities in EU procurement law, positive steps are needed to ensure that SMEs can tender alongside bigger market players on a level playing field.
This is not just a concern for the UK either – the European Commission is equally driven in ensuring market opportunities are open to wider competition and this forms much of its Europe 2020 growth strategy.
In April, the Minister for the Cabinet Office, Francis Maude, announced a number of steps designed to implement the Government’s “radical and ambitious” programme to ensure that the huge purchasing power of the public sector is used to foster growth. This programme of reform is designed to support growth and UK businesses, including SMEs, the Cabinet Office said.
Key measures
Key measures for central government included:
• new commitments from large private sector organisations to publish their government subcontracting opportunities on the Government’s searchable website, Contracts Finder;
• a new approach to IT contracts: introducing set breakpoints in IT contracts so there is less money locked into large lengthy contracts. The Government said it would look to disaggregate future contracts and deliver flexible, cheaper solutions. This opens up opportunities for SMEs and reduces the cost to taxpayers;
• prompter payment for SMEs;
• extending the Mystery Shopper service: where SMEs can complain about procurements and trigger an investigation, the Cabinet Office will now investigate complaints
about unfair practices in the supply chain of government contracts;
• better dialogue between Government and smaller businesses: a new online tool will help government buyers to engage earlier with SMEs by allowing them to put informal postings about what they need to buy in future online and for SMEs to respond and explain what they can offer.
In 2011, the Cabinet Office had already unveiled further measures including the elimination of the use of pre-qualification questionnaires (PQQs) for all central government procurements under the EU threshold, and the standardisation of the PQQ, with the objective of ensuring cross-Government adoption of a shortened/less onerous PQQ template.
But are key messages getting through to local government officers procuring contracts?
In the survey, we asked: ‘In light of Cabinet Office policy on better access for SMEs, have you reviewed your tender procedures?’ Only 52% of respondents said ‘yes’; 48% said ‘no’.
Time for change
Those saying ‘yes’ cited the following examples of changes made to their tender procedures:
• Splitting contracts into lots. This is often regarded as not permitted under the procurement regulations. This is incorrect – what is unlawful is breaking down contracts to circumvent the rules.
• Reviewing PQQ questions. What questions are permissible and necessary? Consider what level of experience is required and consider how new market entrants may be able to demonstrate similar experience.
• Simplifying documentation. Review your standard tender
documents, update them and ensure they are clear.
• Simplified PQQs including standardisation. This can work in relation to standard questions, but thresholds should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
• More supplier engagement events. Pre-market engagement is an invaluable tool to alert the SME market to opportunities.
• Resilience in financial ratings. Don’t set thresholds too high – or too low. Consider the nature of each contract and what is proportionate.
• Giving SMEs opportunities to form consortia and inclusion of SMEs in sub-contracting chain. This can include holding events to encourage local businesses to get together with larger suppliers.
• Work with other organisations to improve communication of opportunities.
The Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on public procurement (draft 18 October 2012) includes provisions which support increased participation of SMEs in EU contract procurements. This includes self-certification, cutting out the need for all applicants to complete and provide supporting evidence at selection stage, and a financial turnover threshold limited to a maximum of three times the contract value (where proportionate to the contract).
All of these measures should open up market opportunities to SMEs, but will require positive steps to be taken by contracting authorities. As the survey results show, these messages are being heard by at least half of respondents.
Elizabeth Cooper is a partner at Bevan Brittan.










