Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements: Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21

Julie Bann and David Leach analyse a landmark Supreme Court ruling on holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements.Icons Hazard

The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21 that the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) do not provide for pro-rating of the holiday entitlement for permanent workers who only worked for part of the year will be disappointing and costly for many organisations but has provided welcome clarity.

It has always been simple to deal with holiday for permanent employees who work 5 days a week all year and are paid a consistent salary. The WTR are also very clear on pro rating the 5.6 weeks leave for part- time workers who work over 52 weeks. Most guides (including ACAS) advised that it was also appropriate to pro-rate holiday entitlement for workers who worked for only part of the year such as term time only workers, although this was not stipulated within the WTR.  The fabled 12.07% to calculate holiday for atypical workers was general custom and practice. It now transpires that this means of calculating leave and pay is contrary to the WTR.

This final judgment will have substantial implications for how organisations calculate holiday pay and entitlement for staff on permanent contracts but who only work term-time or another part year work pattern.


Ms Brazel is a peripatetic music teacher at a school run by the Harpur Trust. She has a permanent contract and works a variable number of hours each week, depending on the student demand for private music lessons. She is only paid for the hours that she teaches during term time.

Under the WTR, she is entitled to a statutory minimum holiday entitlement of 5.6 weeks but as she does not work during school holidays, she receives more than the minimum holiday leave entitlement. The issue was in relation to her holiday pay, which was treated as being taken in three equal tranches (the spring, summer and winter holidays).

From September 2011, the Harpur Trust used the calculation method promoted by many guides and ACAS in calculating 12.07% of the total hours worked at the end of each term and then multiplying this by her fixed hourly rate to determine her holiday pay. (12.07% is the proportion that 5.6 weeks of annual leave bears to the total working year for an FTE).

Ms Brazel pursued an unlawful deduction of wages claim in the Employment Tribunal arguing that the Working Time Regulations did not provide for pro rating holiday for part year workers. While she was initially unsuccessful at the ET, the EAT, Court of Appeal and now the Supreme Court found that there was no legal basis for creating this system of prorating holiday entitlement.


The Supreme Court found that the 5.6 weeks leave was the basic minimum requirement and there was no European law preventing a state from offering more generous provision. They also held that the any calculation for pro-rating leave for part year workers was not provided for in the WTR and was contrary to the holiday pay requirements.

Briefing on Implications

Employers must ensure that all workers are entitled to 5.6 weeks paid leave a year even if they do not work for the full 52 week leave year.

The 12.07% calculation is not a safe or legal method and should be avoided. The only way to calculate holiday pay is by taking an average of hours worked over the last 52 weeks of the leave year, (ignoring any weeks not worked) to calculate the weeks’ pay which is then multiplied by 5.6 weeks leave.

The Supreme Court accepted that there will be rare exceptions that will create some anomalies, but that this does not undo the clear statutory scheme. In circumstances where you have a worker contracted for a year, but only works one week that year. It also accepted that there will situations where this will be worse than the 12.07%.

The ruling has immediate and serious implications for organisations, which offer term time only employment such as schools, nurseries and other childcare facilities and any employer who has workers with atypical part-year arrangements.

Next steps

If you have not already done so, organisations must immediately review their holiday pay and leave calculations for term time or part year workers. Contracts and leave policies should be updated to reflect the statutory minimum.

Organisations should also undertake an audit of the number of staff impacted by this change in calculation and assess their liability for claims for underpayment of holiday pay. Please note that unlawful deduction of wages claims has a cap of two years.

We understand that some Unions are threatening indirect discrimination claims which would remove the 2-year cap. We believe such claims can be successfully resisted.

An important distinction which must be considered, is that this judgment applies to workers who are permanently engaged to work only part of the year but this may not extend to workers who happen to start or finish work part way through the year.

Julie Bann is a Partner and David Leach is an Associate at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

Icons House

UK Emission Trading Scheme to include waste incineration installations

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas take a look at the UK Emission Trading Scheme and new decisions on waste incineration.
Icons Document

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Joe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Date

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemption
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Icons Hazard

Three new Levels to ‘level up’ Local Government in England?

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of local government, takes a look at the new proposals under the Government’s Levelling Up White Paper to facilitate devolution to remaining regions of local government in England which are currently without a Mayoral Combined Authority.
Icons Hazard

Will employers still be able to use the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ in 2022?

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss a recent case in which the High Court has granted an injunction preventing Tesco from using the controversial employment practice of ‘fire and rehire’.
Icons Hazard

Progress on Climate Change action plans in Local Government

Stephen Cirell discusses the progress on climate change and renewable energy action plans within Local Government.
Slide background