Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Icons CourtJuli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.

The Public Procurement Review Service (“PPRS”), a body set up by the Cabinet Office to investigate concerns from suppliers in relation to procurement practices, recently published its 2020/2021 Progress Report. The report provides insights into the cases investigated by the PPRS in the 2020-2021 financial year and outlines the main trends and issues raised by suppliers.

The top five areas for complaints were as follows:

  • Payment – 30 of the cases referred to the PPRS concerned non-payment of valid and undisputed invoices. Regulation 113 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (“PCR 2015”) implies into all contracts the requirement to pay valid and undisputed invoices within 30 days. The PPRS upheld all of these complaints, leading to the payment of £602.9k to suppliers.
  • Evaluation – 12 cases related to the evaluation process of the procurement, with specific concerns including the criteria used and conflicts of interest within the evaluation panel.
  • Use of Frameworks – Concerns raised included the use of the direct award procedure, as well as the rationale of suppliers in choosing the most appropriate agreement in the circumstances. The majority of the ten cases related to Crown Commercial Service Frameworks, in particular the Digital Marketplace.
  • Feedback – Seven cases concerned a lack of detailed feedback or no feedback at all being provided to bidders when their submissions had been rejected. This meant that suppliers were not able to understand why their bids had failed. The PPRS argues that detailed feedback allows suppliers learn for future bids, and can help to improve the quality of bids in general.
  • Advertisement – The majority of the six cases concerned timeframes, the process contracting authorities used to advertise, and a perception that advertisements were written in favour of the incumbent.
  • While some of the cases referenced above were dismissed by the PPRS, they are helpful in understanding the main concerns of suppliers and issues for contracting authorities to be aware of.

To avoid the pitfalls highlighted by the PPRS report, the following is a checklist of points for contracting authorities to remember, at each stage of the lifecycle of a procurement:


If intending to use a framework agreement, contracting authorities should carefully consider the following factors:

  • Class – Is the contracting authority sufficiently identified as being entitled to use the framework?
  • Scope – Does the project satisfy the required technical and essential specific standards to use the framework? Does the framework scope meet the project needs?
  • Term – Does the framework permit call-off contracts of the length needed to complete the project?
  • Value – Will the total value permitted by the framework be exceeded?
  • Process – Have the rules laid down by the framework been followed?

In particular, if making a direct award, have the criteria for doing so been met?


Contracting authorities must be aware of their responsibilities under the procurement law regime to advertise contract opportunities. These responsibilities include complying with relevant time limits and opportunities on particular platforms (including the Find a Tender Service or Contracts Finder, as appropriate). Procurement Policy Note 07/21 outlines these transparency requirements, and we have explained this in further detail in an article on our website.
The advertisement must contain sufficient detail to ensure a fair competition.


The evaluation criteria must determine the most economically advantageous tender (Regulation 67 PCR 2015), and it must actually form the basis of the decision.
Published evaluation criteria must be transparent; clear guidance should be provided to bidders as to how their answers will be evaluated.

For each project, relevant parties should complete conflict of interest checks. A record of any actual, potential and perceived conflicts should be kept and regularly updated if circumstances change. Assistance on managing conflicts of interest can be found in PPN 04/21, and its accompanying guidance, which includes conflict of interest declaration templates which are provided and updated by the Cabinet Office.


The PPRS suggests that feedback should be provided to successful and unsuccessful bidders by contracting authorities after both shortlisting and evaluation.
It is recommended by the PPRS that detailed feedback should be provided to all suppliers, not just those who request it, and that feedback should be comprehensive and allow bidders to understand why their bid was accepted or rejected.
In any case, contracting authorities should be mindful of their duties to give feedback and notification of decisions, as set out in Regulations 55 and 86 PCR 2015.


Contracting authorities should bear in mind the requirements implied into contracts under Regulation 113 PCR 2015 that all valid and undisputed invoices must be paid to contractors within 30 days of the invoice becoming due, and that sub-contracts and sub-sub-contracts must contain similar prompt payment provisions.

It is worth noting that the “Transforming Public Procurement” Green Paper published last year proposes the replacement of the PPRS with a new oversight body which is to carry out an increased level of monitoring.

Furthermore, unlike the PPRS, this new unit would have the ability to issue enforcement notices to individual contracting authorities, with further possible action including spending controls. With these proposals pending, it is even more important that contracting authorities take heed of the types of complaints which are being brought to the PPRS’ attention, and ensure that they have sufficient processes in place to avoid the common pitfalls.

Juli Lau is a Legal Director and Beth Edwards is a Paralegal at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

<a href=

Momentum for Heat Network Roll Out Gathers Pace

Steve Gummer discusses the increased momentum for a Heat Network Rollout.
Icons Hazard

Unconscious Bias, Discrimination and a Warning to Public Sector Employers

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss two employment tribunal judgements, which provide a stark warning to public sector employers about unconscious bias and discrimination.
<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
Icons Hazard

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Alastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
<a href=

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Slide background