Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Icons CourtJuli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.

The Public Procurement Review Service (“PPRS”), a body set up by the Cabinet Office to investigate concerns from suppliers in relation to procurement practices, recently published its 2020/2021 Progress Report. The report provides insights into the cases investigated by the PPRS in the 2020-2021 financial year and outlines the main trends and issues raised by suppliers.

The top five areas for complaints were as follows:

  • Payment – 30 of the cases referred to the PPRS concerned non-payment of valid and undisputed invoices. Regulation 113 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (“PCR 2015”) implies into all contracts the requirement to pay valid and undisputed invoices within 30 days. The PPRS upheld all of these complaints, leading to the payment of £602.9k to suppliers.
  • Evaluation – 12 cases related to the evaluation process of the procurement, with specific concerns including the criteria used and conflicts of interest within the evaluation panel.
  • Use of Frameworks – Concerns raised included the use of the direct award procedure, as well as the rationale of suppliers in choosing the most appropriate agreement in the circumstances. The majority of the ten cases related to Crown Commercial Service Frameworks, in particular the Digital Marketplace.
  • Feedback – Seven cases concerned a lack of detailed feedback or no feedback at all being provided to bidders when their submissions had been rejected. This meant that suppliers were not able to understand why their bids had failed. The PPRS argues that detailed feedback allows suppliers learn for future bids, and can help to improve the quality of bids in general.
  • Advertisement – The majority of the six cases concerned timeframes, the process contracting authorities used to advertise, and a perception that advertisements were written in favour of the incumbent.
  • While some of the cases referenced above were dismissed by the PPRS, they are helpful in understanding the main concerns of suppliers and issues for contracting authorities to be aware of.

To avoid the pitfalls highlighted by the PPRS report, the following is a checklist of points for contracting authorities to remember, at each stage of the lifecycle of a procurement:


If intending to use a framework agreement, contracting authorities should carefully consider the following factors:

  • Class – Is the contracting authority sufficiently identified as being entitled to use the framework?
  • Scope – Does the project satisfy the required technical and essential specific standards to use the framework? Does the framework scope meet the project needs?
  • Term – Does the framework permit call-off contracts of the length needed to complete the project?
  • Value – Will the total value permitted by the framework be exceeded?
  • Process – Have the rules laid down by the framework been followed?

In particular, if making a direct award, have the criteria for doing so been met?


Contracting authorities must be aware of their responsibilities under the procurement law regime to advertise contract opportunities. These responsibilities include complying with relevant time limits and opportunities on particular platforms (including the Find a Tender Service or Contracts Finder, as appropriate). Procurement Policy Note 07/21 outlines these transparency requirements, and we have explained this in further detail in an article on our website.
The advertisement must contain sufficient detail to ensure a fair competition.


The evaluation criteria must determine the most economically advantageous tender (Regulation 67 PCR 2015), and it must actually form the basis of the decision.
Published evaluation criteria must be transparent; clear guidance should be provided to bidders as to how their answers will be evaluated.

For each project, relevant parties should complete conflict of interest checks. A record of any actual, potential and perceived conflicts should be kept and regularly updated if circumstances change. Assistance on managing conflicts of interest can be found in PPN 04/21, and its accompanying guidance, which includes conflict of interest declaration templates which are provided and updated by the Cabinet Office.


The PPRS suggests that feedback should be provided to successful and unsuccessful bidders by contracting authorities after both shortlisting and evaluation.
It is recommended by the PPRS that detailed feedback should be provided to all suppliers, not just those who request it, and that feedback should be comprehensive and allow bidders to understand why their bid was accepted or rejected.
In any case, contracting authorities should be mindful of their duties to give feedback and notification of decisions, as set out in Regulations 55 and 86 PCR 2015.


Contracting authorities should bear in mind the requirements implied into contracts under Regulation 113 PCR 2015 that all valid and undisputed invoices must be paid to contractors within 30 days of the invoice becoming due, and that sub-contracts and sub-sub-contracts must contain similar prompt payment provisions.

It is worth noting that the “Transforming Public Procurement” Green Paper published last year proposes the replacement of the PPRS with a new oversight body which is to carry out an increased level of monitoring.

Furthermore, unlike the PPRS, this new unit would have the ability to issue enforcement notices to individual contracting authorities, with further possible action including spending controls. With these proposals pending, it is even more important that contracting authorities take heed of the types of complaints which are being brought to the PPRS’ attention, and ensure that they have sufficient processes in place to avoid the common pitfalls.

Juli Lau is a Legal Director and Beth Edwards is a Paralegal at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

Icons Hazard

“True value” adjudications and subsequent “smash and grab” adjudications

Michael Comba and Victoria Okafor summarise the case of Bexheat Ltd v Essex Services Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 936 (TCC) (19 April 2022).
Icons Research

Transforming Public Procurement – "our transparency ambition”

Sophie Mcfie-Hyland asks whether changes to the "transparency" requirements of the new public procurement regime will prove beneficial or burdensome for contracting authorities.
Icons Hazard

Holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements: Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21

Julie Bann and David Leach analyse a landmark Supreme Court ruling on holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements.
Icons House

UK Emission Trading Scheme to include waste incineration installations

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas take a look at the UK Emission Trading Scheme and new decisions on waste incineration.
Icons Document

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Joe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Date

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemption
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Slide background