Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemptionIcons Date

The Procurement Bill 2022 (the Bill) has been published and aims to reform the UK’s public procurement regime following its exit from the European Union (EU), to create a simpler and more transparent system, not based on transposed EU Directives. When you look at the Bill, there are lots of concepts that remain the same. However, when you start looking beneath the surface, there are a number of significant changes to consider. This article examines Schedule 2 of the Bill and focuses on certain omitted exemptions.

The Current Regime

The current public procurement regime, under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (SI 2015/102) (PCR 2015), applies the Teckal exemption where a contracting authority contracts with a legally distinct entity – usually this will be a company that the authority has set up, either on its own or in concert with others – to provide services. The conditions for the exemption are that:

  • The service provider carries out the principal part of its activities with the authority.
  • The authority exercises the same kind of control over the service provider as it does over its own departments.
  • There is no private sector ownership of the service provider nor any intention that there should be any.

Where these conditions are met, the arrangement will not be treated as a contract for the purposes of the PCR 2015, rather it will be deemed to be an in-house administrative arrangement. In other words, the PCR 2015 will not apply to that arrangement.

This language has changed under the Bill.

The Procurement Bill 2022

The definition of ‘public contract’ in the Bill is similar to that contained in the PCR. That is framework agreements, concession contracts and contracts for the supply of goods, services or works for pecuniary interests with an estimated value above the relevant threshold and which are not an exempted contract. The contracts which are exempt are set out in Schedule 2 to the Bill – here you will find many familiar exemptions. You will also find the provisions in relation to the in-house exemption, which was previously found in Regulation 12 of the PCR and still widely referred to as the Teckal exemption.

The main exceptions under the Bill are:

  • Vertical arrangements – arrangements between a contracting authority and a controlled entity with more than 80% of activities carried out by controlled entity for or on behalf of the contracting authority.
  • Horizontal arrangement – arrangements between authorities with the aim of achieving common objectives within their public functions and solely in the public interest. No more than 20% of the activities covered can be carried out other than for the purposes of the authorities’ public functions.

Those familiar with such concepts will see that the Teckal or in-house exemption is now called ‘vertical arrangements’ and the public sector co-operation exemption (often referred to as the Hamburg exemption) is now called ‘horizontal arrangements’ but are these concepts really as similar as they initially appear?

Vertical Exemption and Implications for Public Sector Companies

Under the PCR 2015 and firmed up in the Risk Management Partners v LB Brent case, the Teckal exemption applies to shared services. A key point raised in the Brent judgment was an authority does not have to hold all of the share capital in the proposed service provider. It can do this together with other public authorities. In such circumstances, it is not necessary to show that it alone has the power of decisive influence over both strategic objectives and significant decisions of the company, but that the authorities together exercise this control. It means that a group of local authorities can get together and set up a company – an ordinary private law company limited by shares – to run, for example, their municipal car parks, or leisure centers. Provided that the shares are all owned by the authorities and that the board of directors is controlled by them, it is likely that the company will qualify for the exemption. That means that those authorities can contract with it to provide the services in question without going through a public procurement exercise.

However, the Bill as drafted, does not seemingly allow multi-authority-controlled vehicles (as was previously provided for in Regulation 12(4) of the PCR and case law).

In other words, within the Bill, local authorities which set up ‘single’ entities on their own will continue to benefit from the vertical exemption, meaning they can award contracts to an entity without going through a full procurement process. However, contracts that councils award to joint entities, controlled by multiple local authorities, appear no longer to be exempt and will potentially be subject to a full procurement process. This would undermine the purpose and benefits of councils operating joint entities.

This is a surprising omission from the Bill and one without any real logic. Given the hundreds of shared-services vehicles throughout local government, the need to ensure that these arrangements are not prohibited will potentially require some amendment to the Bill. Given the speed at which those drafting the Bill were required to operate, it is entirely possible that these provisions simply got left out in error.

Next Steps

The Bill is not expected to be implemented until 2023 at the earliest, but the Government has promised a six-month transition period to allow for an appropriate transition to the new regime.

Meanwhile, the key message to public authorities is to keep a close eye on these aspects of the Bill, as key commercial decisions will need to be made. We will keep readers updated on changes to the Bill as it makes its way through its remaining stages.

Peter Collins is a Partner and Sophie Pilcher is a Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

Icons Hazard

“True value” adjudications and subsequent “smash and grab” adjudications

Michael Comba and Victoria Okafor summarise the case of Bexheat Ltd v Essex Services Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 936 (TCC) (19 April 2022).
Icons Research

Transforming Public Procurement – "our transparency ambition”

Sophie Mcfie-Hyland asks whether changes to the "transparency" requirements of the new public procurement regime will prove beneficial or burdensome for contracting authorities.
Icons Hazard

Holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements: Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21

Julie Bann and David Leach analyse a landmark Supreme Court ruling on holiday entitlement and pay for atypical working arrangements.
Icons House

UK Emission Trading Scheme to include waste incineration installations

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas take a look at the UK Emission Trading Scheme and new decisions on waste incineration.
Icons Document

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Joe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Icons Hazard

Three new Levels to ‘level up’ Local Government in England?

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of local government, takes a look at the new proposals under the Government’s Levelling Up White Paper to facilitate devolution to remaining regions of local government in England which are currently without a Mayoral Combined Authority.
Slide background