Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

Consultation on the Electronic Communications Code – What’s Changing?

<a href=Lillee Reid-Hunt outlines the legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code.


This week the government published its response to the consultation on legislative changes to the Electronic Communications Code (the ‘2017 Code’), which was launched by the Department for Digital, Culture Media & Sport in the first quarter of 2021.

The 2017 Code was introduced to support and enhance the process for delivery of telecommunications infrastructure throughout the UK. As such, it is unsurprisingly ‘operator friendly’ compared to the old Code. The proposals detailed in the government response seek to clarify areas of difficulty that have been identified by stakeholders since the introduction of the 2017 Code, namely (1) obtaining and using Code agreements; (2) sharing and upgrading; and (3) expired agreements. Unfortunately for site providers, the ‘no-network’ valuation methodology is outside the scope of the consultation, and many of the proposals appear to extend the rights currently enjoyed by operators under the 2017 Code. However, while the purpose of the legislation is to assist with meeting the nationwide gigabit-capable coverage targets it will be interesting to see how the government’s proposals are incorporated into the legislation in a manner that also protects the private property rights of site providers.

At a glance, the key proposals include:

  1. Obtaining and using Code agreements
  • Alternative dispute resolution should be available (but not mandatory) to determine disputes that are not concerned with the legal interpretation of the Code. Operators will have a duty to consider ADR before applying to the courts in relation to new agreements, as well as renewals and termination.
  • Operators should have a complaints procedure in place. Ofcom will be charged with including in its Code of Practice matters concerning operators’ handling of complaints regarding their conduct under Code agreements and negotiations, and Ofcom should have enforcement powers if an operator has breached its complaints handling requirements.
  • There should be no fast-track court procedures for Code cases.
  • The Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021 addressed the issue with non-responsive landlords of multi-let buildings where a tenant has requested connection. A similar process should be included in the Code so that where an operator does not receive a response from a site provider then a process will be followed (including the issue of further notices) before the operator can apply to the Tribunal for Code rights, which can then be imposed for a maximum of 6 years. Powers should be given to the Secretary of State to make regulations in connection with the process and requirements.
  • The definition of ‘occupier’ should be changed so that if an operator is the ‘occupier’ as defined in the Code, then it should be able to obtain Code rights from whoever would be able to grant the rights if the operator was not in occupation i.e. the landowner or whoever has rights to control the use of the land otherwise.
  1. Rights to upgrade and share apparatus
  • Existing rights on upgrading and sharing to remain, and no prescriptive conditions to be added – only the existing ‘no adverse impact or no more than minimal adverse impact on appearance’ and ‘no additional burden on site provider’ to remain.
  • Upgrading is listed as specific a Code right under paragraph 3, but sharing is not. Paragraph 3 should include a ‘bare’ right to share. This means that any ancillary rights necessary to exercise the right to share (such as terms around access of the additional operator/s etc.) will need to be negotiated between the parties or imposed by the courts.
  • Automatic rights to share and upgrade, which apply to 2017 Code agreements, should apply to pre 2017 Code agreements and existing apparatus provided that there is no material impact on the site provider and subject to other conditions so that the right is more limited than its application to 2017 Code agreements.
  1. Expired agreements
    • Part 5 of the 2017 Code deals with renewal and termination of expired Code agreements, but it only applies to ‘subsisting agreements’. This excludes, for example, 1954 Act leases and instances where there is no evidence of continuing Code rights.  There should be amendments to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 to ensure that the renewal and termination framework aligns more closely with Part 5 and enable the Upper Tribunal to hear disputes relating to agreements governed by the 1954 Act.  Where there is no evidence of continuing Code rights, then operators should be able to seek new Code agreements in the usual manner under Part 4 of the Code
    • All renewal disputes should be able to be referred directly to the First Tier or Upper Tribunal and the Secretary of State should amend the time limits around how long a court has to determine a dispute.
    • Whereas only site providers can currently apply to the court for an interim order determining the amount of rent an operator should pay whilst the parties negotiate a renewal agreement, this right should also be afforded to operators and the right to apply for interim orders should be extended beyond financial terms – it should be for modification of any terms to apply in the interim following expiry of an agreement.

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Lillee Reid-Hunt is a Senior Associate at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

<a href=

Momentum for Heat Network Roll Out Gathers Pace

Steve Gummer discusses the increased momentum for a Heat Network Rollout.
Icons Hazard

Unconscious Bias, Discrimination and a Warning to Public Sector Employers

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss two employment tribunal judgements, which provide a stark warning to public sector employers about unconscious bias and discrimination.
<a href=

Levelling up – A new opportunity for further devolution in England?

Rob Hann explores the Government's 'levelling up' policy and looks at whether it is an opportunity for further devolution in England.
<a href=

Time limits for commencing proceedings in procurement challenges

Colin Ricciardiello discusses a landmark procurement challenge judgment on the time limit for commencing proceedings.
Icons Hazard

The Revised National Planning Policy Framework: Better design, greener outcomes?

Alastair Lewis and Sarah Wertheim outline the latest National Planning Policy Framework changes and explain how future developments will be impacted by the new rules.
<a href=

Loose talk costs money: Oral agreement to forego liquidated damages was valid

Michael Comba outlines and analyses a contract dispute resolution: Mansion Place Ltd v Fox Industrial Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 2972 (TCC)
<a href=

Procurement reform – an update

Radhika Devesher and Natasha Barlow provide a summary of the proposed and enacted changes to the UK procurement regime post-Brexit.
Icons Court

The Public Procurement Review Service Report: Procurement Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards examine some of the most common procurement pitfalls and provide a checklist of points for local authorities to bear in mind in order to avoid costly errors.
<a href=

JCT Dispute Adjudication Board Rules: a case of “three’s a crowd”?

Peter Jansen who specialises in construction law and dispute resolution, examines the roles and functions of the JCT’s Dispute Adjudication Board and highlights some key considerations for parties planning to adopt the Rules in their JCT contracts.
<a href=

The Electric Vehicle Revolution or…

Emily Knowles discusses new legislation on the requirement of electric vehicle charging points, and its potential impact on the Electric Vehicle Revolution.
Icons Court

You Must Adjudicate First NEC3 imposes obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.

Michael Comba discusses NEC3 imposing an obligation to adjudicate first before commencing court proceedings.
Icons Court

Rocking aground the Christmas tree

Clare Mendelle and George Dale discuss and solve a common construction scenario, looking at the position under the Contract, and how the Employer should deal with the Contractor's request.
Icons Hazard

Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK

Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
<a href=

Managing employees with long COVID and employees who have anxiety about returning to the office

Julie Bann and Victoria Smith consider how Long Covid may be treated under existing employment laws and provide compliance guidance for employers.
<a href=

Environment Act 2021: What Does it Mean for Waste Authorities?

Sally Stock, Juli Lau, Ellen Painter and Beth Edwards discuss notable changes made to the Environment Bill 2021-2022, which received Royal Assent on the 9th November.
<a href=

ESG and its relevance to the public sector

Peter Collins and Sydney Chandler discuss the growing importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria in public procurement.
<a href=

JCT 101: Time and Punishment

Rachel Murray-Smith, Clare Mendelle and Laura Campbell discuss a common Construction scenario regarding the Practical Completion of a project, and the position under the unamended JCT DB 2016.
Icons Court

The importance of due process, communication and fairness in employee conduct investigations – what you need to know.

Julie Bann and James Hughes discuss the importance of fairness in employee conduct investigations, taking a look at the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham -v- Mr S Keable case.
<a href=

Becoming More Inclusive: VAT and Public Procurement

Juli Lau, Natasha Barlow and Beth Edwards examine the recently published Public Procurement Regulations 2021, focussing upon amendments to the thresholds within various procurement regimes.
<a href=

The LADs are Alright

Laura Campbell discusses liquidated damages in construction contracts, focussing upon the long-running Triple Point saga which ended in the Supreme Court this year.
<a href=

Procurement Policy Note 08/21

Juli Lau and Beth Edwards outline Procurement Policy Note 08/21, recently published by the Cabinet office.
Icons Court

Hard Times: Improving Air Quality with Clean Air Zones

Rob Hann and James Goldthorpe examine the introduction of Clean Air Zones to improve air quality across the UK.
<a href=

Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021 – What Public Bodies Need To Know

Rob Hann and James Hughes examine the Autumn Budget Spending Review 2021, looking at what Public Bodies need to know.
<a href=

Net Zero – What’s new for local authorities?

Steve Gummer and Sophie Drysdale look at two major climate publications: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and the Net Zero Strategy.
Icons Hazard

Jumping to conclusions: Final Statements, liquidated damages and material breaches of natural justice

Michael Comba looks at a recent Technology and Construction Court case that provides useful guidance on the JCT’s procedural requirements on disputing Final Statements.
Icons Court

Three times one equals one: Several disputed payment applications amount to a single dispute

Michael Comba considers a case in which the High Court dismissed an employer’s argument that an adjudicator lacked jurisdiction because the referral concerned three separate payment applications and, therefore, comprised three separate disputes.
<a href=

Warm feelings or hot air: the Heat and Buildings Strategy and Heat Networks

This week the government published its Heat and Buildings Strategy (Strategy). This contained vital innovations and essential step changes in terms of how heating is provided, writes Steve Gummer.
<a href=

Procurement reforms: update from Cabinet Office

Rob Hann, Nicola Sumner and Juli Lau assess the Cabinet Office's update on the progress of the government's public procurement reforms.
Icons Court

Bond, Performance Bond. Delivering value for the Public Sector?

Justin Mendelle examines whether public sector clients achieve value for money from the provision of performance bonds.
Icons Hazard

Not so personal messages: R. (on the application of Good Law Project Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and Abingdon Health Plc [2021] EWHC 2595 (TCC)

Nicola Sumner, Juli Lau and Beth Edwards look at The Good Law Project's challenge of the direct award by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of three contracts for the production and supply of rapid Covid-19 antibody tests (the “Contracts”).
<a href=

Insolvency – Termination and Beyond

Rachel Murray-Smith and Clare Mendelle consider the potential warning signs of, and the compliant manner for dealing with, contractor insolvency.
Icons Court

Settlement agreements – waiving Personal Injury claims

In the case of Farnham-Oliver v RM Educational Resources LTD, the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court allowed a Personal Injury claim (“PI claim”) to be pursued by an employee against his former employer despite the parties signing a Settlement Agreement in respect of an Employment Tribunal claim on the same issue. Julie Bann and James Hughes report.
Icons Hazard

Mandatory Vaccination for Care Home Workers in England – Update

Rachel Murray-Smith and Francesca Gallagher look at the detail of the government's guidance on compulsory vaccination for care staff.
<a href=

Make your mind up! Liquidated Damages clause upheld despite Employer’s challenge

In the recent case of Eco World Ballymore (EWB) v Dobler[1] , an Employer took the unusual position of challenging their own entitlement to liquidated damages (LDs) on the ground that the LDs provision constituted an unenforceable penalty clause. Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe investigate.
<a href=

Are Collateral Warranties Construction Contracts? Timing is Key.

Clare Mendelle and Anna Sidebottom examine the recently decided case of Toppan v Simply[1], which has provided guidance on when collateral warranties may be considered “construction contracts” under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 and so give the warranty holder the right to adjudicate.
Slide background