Local Government Lawyer Home Page

Sharpe Edge Webpage Banner

Welcome to Sharpe Edge, Sharpe Pritchard’s local government legal hub on Local Government Lawyer.

Sharpe Edge features news, views and analysis from our team of specialist local government lawyers working at the heart of the latest legal developments. Sharpe Edge platform is also the only place where local government lawyers can get e-access to two law books by our Head of Local Government Rob Hann: The Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers (‘LACAT’) and The Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships (‘LACAP’).



Slide background

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

Icons HouseThe Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.

The BSA focuses on the safety of ‘higher-risk buildings’ from design stage through to management once occupied, including through raising construction standards generally. It also contains provisions on service charges payable by leaseholders for cladding etc. It is the government’s response to the Grenfell Tower fire and recommendations from the subsequent Hackitt review.

The BSA is weighty and multi-faceted, and many provisions merely enable the making of more detailed regulations, some of which have been published as drafts. To illustrate some of its complexity, different Parts regulate risks for different types of buildings (see box):

The different types of buildings regulated by the Building Safety Act 2022

  1. For the purposes of Part 3, which reforms the building control regime for design and construction, a higher-risk building is a building in England that is at least 18 metres / 7 storeys high AND is of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State. The draft Higher-Risk Buildings (Descriptions and Supplementary Provisions) Regulations list buildings with at least two residential units, care homes and hospitals as higher-risk buildings for this purpose and excludes secure residential institutions, temporary leisure establishments and military premises. The government is currently consulting on these draft regulations until 21st July here
  2. Some aspects of Part 3, and other parts of the BSA, relate to any building which is subject to building control, not just the higher risk ones referred to in (1) above.
  3. For the purposes of Part 4, which imposes new management requirements for occupied residential buildings, a higher-risk building is a building in England that is at least 18 metres in height or has at least 7 storeys and contains at least 2 residential units. However despite the Act having only just been passed, the government is already consulting on having some exclusions from this (same consultation as at (1) above).
  4. For the purpose of Schedule 8, which applies to limit service charges for residential long leaseholders certain safety-related works, this applies to “relevant buildings” of a lower height than above, being at least 11 metres/ 5 storeys high, and containing at least two dwellings.

What came into force on 28th June 2022 (2 months from Royal Assent)?

1) Establishment of a new building safety regulator or BSR– the existing Health & Safety Executive (HSE) will fulfill this role. It has to exercise its functions with a view to:

  • Securing the safety of people in or about buildings (all buildings)
  • Improving the standard of buildings.

It has initial duties from 28th June to draw up strategy, consult on regulations etc

2) Leaseholder rights to get defects rectified, and limits on service charges

  • A key date here is 28th February 2022 – qualifying long leaseholders get rights only if their lease was granted before this date, and they also need to meet other requirements around living there/owning other properties, liability for service charges, length of lease.
  • See “relevant building” definition above; “relevant defects” / “relevant works” are also key.

By Schedule 8, no service charges are payable for relevant works and related issues for remedying a relevant defect (or to prevent one materialising) where:

  • It is for remediation of unsafe cladding, or
  • The landlord or an associate was “responsible” (as defined) for the relevant defect, or
  • The landlord meets a “contribution condition” – based on value of the landlord’s group (not applying to local authorities or private registered providers of social housing), or
  • The value of the lease is below a certain value – in London £325,00 and elsewhere £175,000, or
  • It is for legal or professional services relating to liability for relevant defects.

In other cases, service charges for relevant works are capped if certain conditions are fulfilled, both subject to an overall cap and also an annual limit.

The legislation could also bite on limiting/ refunding of charges made for “waking watches” post-Grenfell, which attracted a lot of media attention. These may qualify as “measures” to reduce risk in relation to “relevant defects”.

Also in force:

  • Lease covenants seeking to limit the Schedule 8 rights are automatically void.
  • The ability to apply for a “building liability order” – the High Court can determine contributions that different potentially responsible parties can be required to make towards any liability under the BSA. This should prevent, for example, a complicated company structure or tiers of subcontractors being used to avoid liability.

Note: under future regulations further rights will be available in relation to safety works:

  • To provide leaseholders with a mechanism to enforce refunds of service charges where they have already paid out for relevant works, if their leases do not already provide for this
  • Qualifying leaseholders, the BSR, local authority or fire authority can apply to the First-tier Tribunal for an order that the then landlord rectify a relevant defect (a remediation order).
  • The First-tier tribunal under a “remediation contribution order” can also order that related parties, such as the landlord or developer at the time of the construction, or even certain company directors, have to contribute to the costs of anyrelevant defects.
  • section 20 notices to recover service charges – landlord needs first to have applied for any insurance payout, grant etc available, and deduct this before charging leaseholders.

3) Enhanced Liability under the Defective Premises Act 1972

Despite its title, the relevant parts of this Act only regulate dwellings, and whether they are constructed / designed in a workmanlike/ professional manner and using proper materials, so as to be “fit for habitation”. Section 1 already covers civil liability of builders and designers when the dwelling was built, and a new section 2A is inserted by the BSA to extend this to subsequent works.

Then the limitation period for claims under sections 1 and 2A accruing for buildings completed after 28th June 2022 is extended to 15 years from completion, and the limitation period for claims accruing under section 1 only for buildings completed before 28th June 2022 is extended to 30 years. Retrospective liability of this type is very unusual, and there is a defence under human rights legislation.

Note: it is also intended to bring into force the never-implemented section 38 of the Building Act 1984 about civil claims being available for those who have suffered loss arising out of the misapplication of or failure to apply the relevant Building Regulations. Once in force this will also have a limitation period of 15 years, but not retrospectively.

4) Setting up a framework to better regulate the supply and marketing of construction products.

The detailed regulations to implement this will not happen until 2023 (will replace an existing framework, under which for example the cladding of the type used at Grenfell has already been banned) with the overall emphasis on safety and not mere meeting of technical standards. However, what is in force from 28th June 2022 is the overall framework (Schedule 11) plus new potential civil liability for manufacturers and suppliers of construction products where conditions are met. Again, this is focused on housing and being “unfit for habitation”. A wide range of behaviour can be caught, such as false statements in marketing information. The limitation period for this will be 15 years, but with special retrospective liability for past cladding defaults of 30 years from when the works were completed, provided completion was before 28th June 2022, though again with a human rights legislation defence. Courts can make costs contribution orders where more than one party is liable.

What will come into force later?

The timeline indicated by the government is that the rest of the BSA will come into force over the next 12-18 months, however more detailed regulations may still then be required. Key provisions:

1: Further powers for the BSR – enforcing or regulating many of the items listed above

2: Amending the Building Act 1984 etc – Part 3 of the Act.

When in force, this Part will:

  1. make the BSR the building control authority in place of the local authority for all “higher risk” buildings (definition as above for Part 3)
  2. allow more safety-related detail to be included in future building regulations. These regulation-making powers are general, all the BSA inserts into the Building Act 1984 is that “Building Regulations may make provision for…..” This includes: provisions about the Building Regulations being able to provide for new dutyholder roles prior to and during construction – gov.uk indicates this will apply for all buildings which need to comply with Building Regulations, not just those “higher-risk”. Ability for building regulations to include more enforcement eg being able to get work opened up for inspection. Some aspects enforceable as criminal offences.
  3. Extending criminal liability for offences under the Building Act 1984 which are committed by a body corporate, to directors/partners etc committing an offence – where they have “consented” or “connived”. The range of sentences on conviction also increase.
  4. Implement new building control approval gateways – the term “gateway” has been used in commentary, though this term is not in the BSA amendments to the Building Act 1984 Building control approval for gateway 1 (introduced last year separately by reforming the planning legislation but with a different definition of the buildings to which it relates to any of those set out in the BSA!) and gateway 2 (pre-construction) will lapse after 3 years. it is not yet clear whether the regulations will cover “higher risk” buildings only, though information on gov.uk indicates so.
  5. A levy on building control approval, to fund building safety expenditure
  6. Requirements for a “golden thread” of information to be held about buildings
  7. Reform of the building control profession with the BSR as regulator – building approvers certifying compliance with building regulations (previously called “building inspectors”) to be registered, coupled with a Code of conduct and minimum qualifications.

Part 4: Regulating higher risk occupied residential buildings (see definition above). This focuses on a key concept of “building safety risk”. This Part includes:

  1. Requiring such buildings to be registered with the BSR (including existing buildings) and that a completion certificate under the Building Act 1984 must be in place before a higher risk residential building can be occupied
  2. Appointment of an “accountable person” to manage building safety risks, carry out certain duties and respond to the regulator – failure of that person to carry out their duties can see the building placed in special measures.
  3. Other rights for residents including supply of information with rent demands, landlord covenants implied into leases around building safety, and better rights to complain.

5) Creating a new homes ombudsman and other protections for occupants of new homes.

6) The detail of the construction products regulatory framework already described.

The full Act can be viewed here and Commencement Order no.1 here

Deborah Down is a Legal Director at Sharpe Pritchard LLP

For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.

sharpe edge 600x100

This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LACAT BookFREE download!

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers

Written and edited by Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of Local Government, Rob Hann,

A Guide to Local Authority Charging and Trading Powers covers:

• Updated charging powers compendium          • Commercial trading options

• Teckal ‘public to public’                                    • Localism Act


LACAT BookAvailable to buy:

A Guide to Local Authority Companies and Partnerships

An invaluable, comprehensive toolkit for lawyers, law firms and others advising
on or participating in Local Authority Companies and Partnerships”

- Local Authority Chief Executive


  More Articles

Icons Document

Signet Trading Limited v First Property Group – First Award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme

Joe Walker and James Nelson outline and analyse the first award under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 Scheme.
Icons Deal

Procurement reforms – implications for procurement challenges and remedies

Colin Ricciardello considers the implications for procurement challenges and remedies arising out of the Government's procurement reforms.
Icons House

Relationship between limitation act and scheme for construction contracts

David Owens and Natasha Barlow look at the implications of Hirst & Another v Dunbar & Others [2022] EWHC 41 (TCC)
Icons House

An Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022

The Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) received Royal Assent in April 2022. Deborah Down outlines the main provisions.
Icons Date

Tackling Teckal – does the new Procurement Bill adequately deal with the Teckal exemption?

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher take a look at whether the new Procurement Bill adequately deals with the Teckal exemption
Icons Hazard

Local authorities on track to more freedom to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the increased freedom for Local Authorities to cut ties with Russian and Belarusian suppliers.
Icons Hazard

Nitrogen Credits Commentary

Emily Knowles, Bernadette Hillman and Steve Gummer discuss the impact of nitrate on planning permission and development in the UK.
Icons House

Thurrock Council & Another v Adams & Ors [2022] EWHC 1324 (QB)

William Rose, Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP, has successfully acted for Thurrock Council and Essex County Council in obtaining a ‘first of its kind’ injunction against individuals connected with the protest group Just Stop Oil.
Icons Date

The Adjudication Part 3: The Response and Further Submissions 9 June 2022

David Owens and James Goldthorpe look at the responding party's response and further submissions during adjudication.
Icons House

A renewable future: focusing energy solutions at a local level

Natasha Barlow and Steve Gummer discuss the 'Energy Trilemma' and how it is playing out at a local level.
Icons Date

Procurement Bill – Initial impressions from the first draft

Juli Lau and Sophie Mcfie-Hyland outline their initial impressions from the first draft of the Procurement Bill.
Icons Hazard

Let’s paint the town green! Government plans for green homes

Laura Campbell discusses the change urgently needed in towns and cities to make the landscape greener.
Icons House

The Queen’s Speech in Brief

The number of Bills which affect public sector clients is greater than usual – and the government have got straight off the starting blocks by publishing some of them already.
Icons Hazard

Refurbishment and Retrofitting: In with the old, out with the new!

Sharpe Pritchard analyse the challenge of decarbonising the construction sector.
Icons House

NET ZERO – What obligations are there on the UK to achieve it?

Radhika Devesher takes a look at the legal duty to achieve net-zero placed upon the UK.
Icons House

Championing green goals through public buying

Juli Lau considers how public purchasing power can be used to champion Net Zero goals, and how public procurement might be used as another driver for change.
Icons Hazard

Top Tips for Local Authority Lawyers advising on Data Protection Matters

Charlotte Smith and Hannah Peto set out some of their top tips to consider when advising on data protection matters.
Icons Court

The Cost of Freedom of Information – The Council’s Failure to Advise

Charlotte Smith and Nadia Ahmed summarise the case and judgement of Moss v Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames and another (NJ/2018/007).
Icons QA

Ask the team

These are frequently asked questions to our experts from colleagues in Local Government via the Sharpe Pritchard ask the team facility concerning local authority companies, partnerships, charging and trading.
Icons Court

A call to review public contracts with Russian suppliers

Juli Lau and Gonzalo Puertas discuss the first official document to consider public sector contracts with companies linked to the Russian and Belarusian state regimes, issued by the Cabinet Office.
Icons Date

A New NEC Option to tackle greenwashing in the construction industry

Allan Owen and Sophie Drysdale discuss 'greenwashing' in the construction industry and a new secondary option clause X29 for its NEC4 suite of contracts developed by NEC.
Icons House

The Pathway to the Future – The Road Map for Employment Tribunals

David Leach discusses and outlines the road map of the planned changes for modernising the Tribunals in 2022 and 2023 released by The Presidents of the Employment Tribunals.
Icons House

Farrar Out

Clare Mendelle and James Goldthorpe discuss how the insolvency of Farrar Construction leads to clarity from the Courts on dealing with an insolvent contractor under JCT.
Icons House

The UK government has this week introduced the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill

Peter Collins and Sophie Pilcher discuss the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Bill introduced by the UK Government this week.
Icons Hazard

A sweet truth for selectivity

Steve Gummer and Gonzalo Puertas discuss a case that concerns an application for judicial review seeking to challenge a decision to introduce a zero-duty autonomous tariff quota (“ATQ”) of 260,000 metric tonnes of raw cane sugar for refining.
Icons House

Adjudication 101: Introduction and Overview

Michael Comba traces the origins of adjudication and considers why the process was introduced, who it is aimed towards and how construction contracts must include certain provisions.
Icons Date

New Government Guidance on PFI Expiry

Rob Hann, Head of Local Government at Sharpe Pritchard, takes a look at new guidance on PFI expiry recently published by the IPA to help public bodies wrestle with the complexities of transition they will face as these contracts reach full term.
Icons Hazard

Three new Levels to ‘level up’ Local Government in England?

Rob Hann, Sharpe Pritchard’s Head of local government, takes a look at the new proposals under the Government’s Levelling Up White Paper to facilitate devolution to remaining regions of local government in England which are currently without a Mayoral Combined Authority.
Icons Hazard

Will employers still be able to use the practice of ‘fire and rehire’ in 2022?

Christian Grierson and Julie Bann discuss a recent case in which the High Court has granted an injunction preventing Tesco from using the controversial employment practice of ‘fire and rehire’.
Icons Hazard

Progress on Climate Change action plans in Local Government

Stephen Cirell discusses the progress on climate change and renewable energy action plans within Local Government.
<a href=

Witches’ hats, sexist comments, and a £2 million pay-out

Julie Bann and Christian Grierson discuss a case in which a finance specialist has won over £2 million in compensation, after claims of sex discrimination and unequal pay.
Slide background