How and why the ‘No Recourse to Public Funds’ policy has been held to be unlawful
In this webinar, Landmark Chambers barristers discuss how and why the ‘No Recourse to Public Funds’ policy has been held to be unlawful.
On 7th May, the Divisional Court upheld a challenge to the Home Office policy of imposing no recourse to public funds conditions on migrants’ leave because it failed to obviate inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR. In this webinar, the legal team acting for the Claimant will explain the long history of the strategic litigation leading to this result.
About the presenters
|
Caz Hattam Unity Project Coordinator. |
Alex Goodman Alex’s specialises in planning, environment and public law including human rights, immigration, discrimination and local government. |
|
Adam Hundt Adam is recognised as one of the leading human rights and public law practitioners in the country. |
Fiona Bawdon Fiona Bawdon is a freelance journalist. She writes on criminal and civil justice issues for the national and specialist legal press. |
Latest Webinars
Forfeiture of leases
Boundary line lessons from White v Alder [2025] EWCA Civ 392
Commonhold Reform in Focus: Implications of the Draft Bill
Animal Sentience
Animal Welfare and Wildlife Protection in Planning Law
Family Law Week Webinar - Financial Remedies Update
Putting Children First: the Evolving Role of the Family Law Professional
Lessons learned in 2025 - a public law update
Leaving care provisions demystified!
