Local Government Lawyer

Demystifying factitious illness​ within care proceedings

Barristers Tina Cook QC and Sharan Bhachu host a discussion aimed at understanding factitious illness​ and the interplay in care proceedings​. 

The discussion centres around factors to consider when pleading and defending cases involving factitious illness alongside a look at the relevant authorities.

About the speakers

Tina Cook QC

Tina Cook QC

Tina is a family law specialist at 42 Bedford Row Chambers and has practised in family law throughout her professional career.

Email

Sharan Bhachu

Sharan Bhachu

Sharan was called to the Bar in 1999 and after completing pupillage developed a practice in all aspects of family law, with a particular emphasis on child protection work at 42 Bedford Row Chambers.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Related Articles
Court of Protection Q&A Series: 2
25-02-2021
Emotional dysregulation and the use of anticipatory declarations in the Court of Protection
20-07-2021
CQC Strategy 2021 (part 2): How ratings could change and how to challenge them
09-07-2021
Court of Protection Q&A Series: 1
12-02-2021
Care and support for disabled and elderly people during ‘Lockdown 3’ in England – key legal considerations
06-01-2021

Latest Webinars

Animal Sentience

42BR present a podcast discussing the concept of 'Animal Sentience'.

Leaving care provisions demystified!

Ann Osbourne and Alison Pryor discuss local authority duties under the Children Act 1989 and the Care Act 2014 – when the duties arise, what they encompass, human rights assessments, and the interface with the issues of immigration and homelessness.

Interveners in financial remedy proceedings

To continue our current family law webinar series, Andrew and Catrin discuss practical tips for intervener claims in financial remedy proceedings – how to identify them, case management, preparing documentation and costs considerations.

Standish 18 months on

Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.