Winchester Vacancies

SPOTLIGHT
Shelved 400px

What now for deprivations of liberty?

What will the effect of the postponement of the Liberty Protections Safeguards be on local authorities? Local Government Lawyer asked 50 adult social care lawyers for their views on the potential consequences.

Council and care home criticised after dispute sees son banned from visiting his mother

A council has agreed to a series of recommendations from the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman after an investigation into a case where a man was barred from visiting his mother in a care home.

The man had raised safeguarding concerns about the welfare of his mother, who has dementia, to the council-commissioned care home after he found bruises. He said this was not an isolated incident and threatened to remove her from the home.

The Ombudsman said that a few days later, following an incident between the man and staff, the care home banned him from visiting. The care home did not give the man, who visited every day, any warning or discuss its concerns before issuing the ban, the LGSCO added.

Nottinghamshire County Council carried out a safeguarding investigation which looked into a number of concerns raised about the mother. It found another resident had caused the reported bruising, the mother did not always have easy access to water, and there were times when she was wet or soiled but this was not the fault of the care home.

The man complained to the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman’s investigation found the care home at fault for the way in which it banned the man from visiting his mother. “It had failed to properly consider whether the ban was necessary, the least restrictive option and the impact this might have on the mother.”

The LGSCO also found that when the care home lifted the restrictions, it did not carry out a risk assessment.

The Ombudsman criticised the home for not considering the mother’s fundamental human right to a family life when banning the son, and for making assumptions, contrary to the Equality Act, about the son’s actions.

The Ombudsman also found the county council at fault for the delay in telling the son the outcome of its safeguarding investigation.

The council has agreed to:

  • apologise to the son
  • pay him £650 for the distress and time and trouble he was put to
  • ensure, through its contract monitoring processes, that the care provider reminds staff about the actions to take before excluding a person from a care home and the importance of recording risk assessments
  • remind its staff about the importance of telling people the outcome of safeguarding investigations as quickly as possible and of recording and completing any follow-up actions arising from a safeguarding investigation.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said: “It is vitally important for care providers to have solid policies and procedures in place for situations in which they are considering restricting access to residents. They need to take into account residents’ social needs and consider less drastic options before taking the ultimate step.

“I welcome the council and care home have accepted my recommendations and hope the training that will be put in place will ensure no other relatives are unjustly discriminated against in future.”

Melanie Brooks, Corporate Director for Adult Social Care and Public Health at Nottinghamshire County Council, said: “We accept the Ombudsman’s findings and apologise to Mr C for the distress and frustration he has experienced.

“We will work with care providers to ensure the recommendations are carried out and the correct procedures are followed before a person can be excluded from a care home. We will also remind our own staff about the importance of telling people the outcome of safeguarding investigations as quickly as possible and ensuring that follow-up actions are recorded and completed.”