Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Sponsored articles
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Unlocking legal talent
Government agrees to reconsider funding for local welfare assistance schemes
- Details
The Government is to re-think its ending of funding for local welfare assistance schemes after legal action supported by a charity and a London borough.
Cheshire resident Christian Jump took action against the Department for Work and Pensions and the Department for Communities and Local Government over the decision to terminate government support for the funds.
They were introduced in 2012 as local versions of the discretionary parts of the Social Fund, with some £70m from the Government.
It emerged last year that the grant would end in May 2015 after neither a consultation nor consideration of the quality duty, according to the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG), which was an ‘intervener’ in the case.
The Government decided not to fight the judicial review but instead accepted a consent order to reconsider its decision to cease funding for the schemes.
This requires the DWP, DCLG and the Treasury to complete their review of local welfare provision, conduct an ‘appropriate’ consultation, consider the equality duty and make a new decision by the time of the provisional local finance settlement, expected in December 2014.
CPAG chief executive Alison Garnham said: “We welcome that the Government has recognised the importance of local welfare assistance schemes and has committed to undertake a thorough review and consultation before deciding how the schemes will be funded in future.
“Local welfare assistance schemes are the final safety net in our social security system. We look forward to working with the government to help find the most effective way of protecting our poorest families.”
The London Borough of Islington supported the judicial review as an interested party, providing evidence of its local use by vulnerable people.
Executive member for finance Andy Hull said: “We made this stand on behalf of tens of thousands of people in need of support up and down the country because we believe that what remains of society’s safety net is worth fighting for.”
Mark Smulian
Sponsored articles
How Finders International Supports Council Officers
How hair strand testing should be instructed for family court proceedings
Principal Lawyer - Community Services Team
Senior Lawyer - Community Services
Locums
Poll
|
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD
We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here.
|
|
OUR KEY LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONTACTS
|
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
||
|
Rachel Murray-Smith Partner 020 7406 4600 Find out more |
















Catherine Newman
