Local Government Lawyer

Interveners in financial remedy proceedings

To continue our current family law webinar series, Andrew and Catrin discuss practical tips for intervener claims in financial remedy proceedings – how to identify them, case management, preparing documentation and costs considerations.

About the speakers

         
 

999 andrew lite

Andrew Pote

Andrew is a highly skilled advocate specialising in Financial Remedy Cases, Private Law children act matters, financial disputes between cohabitees and claims under the inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. Andrew is extremely focused on getting the best outcome for all his clients. He is meticulously prepared and has a keen eye for detail to ensure no stone is left unturned. His cross- examination is direct and efficacious.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

999 andrew lite

Catrin Howells

Catrin joined 42BR in October 2022 following completion of her pupillage in chambers. She has a busy practice spanning private family law and employment. She prides herself on her diligent preparation, practical advice and approachability.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Related Articles
Standish 18 months on
16-03-2026
How to read a Court of Protection judgment
01-11-2022
Does the Care Act 2014 require a local authority to fund a family holiday to Florida?
30-08-2022
Social Services Q&A session
28-07-2020
So the Liberty Protection Safeguards are delayed until April 2022 - what should I do now?
28-07-2020

Latest Webinars

Animal Sentience

42BR present a podcast discussing the concept of 'Animal Sentience'.

Leaving care provisions demystified!

Ann Osbourne and Alison Pryor discuss local authority duties under the Children Act 1989 and the Care Act 2014 – when the duties arise, what they encompass, human rights assessments, and the interface with the issues of immigration and homelessness.

Standish 18 months on

Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.