Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

A clinical commissioning group in the North West has agreed to hold a new public engagement exercise over its funding of homeopathy following a judicial review challenge.

According to the Good Thinking Society, the charity that brought the legal action, Liverpool CCG had been one of a number of CCGs in the Cheshire and Merseyside area to consult the public about the commissioning of treatments.

As part of this exercise Liverpool CCG consulted on the proposal to commission only those complementary therapies recommended by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

NICE does not recommend homeopathy for any condition, the Society said. It added that there had been no responses from the public which raised concern about the proposal to terminate funding for homeopathy, and the area Commissioning Support Unit subsequently recommended adopting the proposal.

A meeting of Liverpool CCG’s Governing Body in December 2014 decided, however, to continue funding homeopathy services.

The Society claimed that the board cited reasons “which had not been raised in the consultation exercise and which were unevidenced”.

After the Society challenged that decision by way of judicial review, Liverpool CCG reportedly agreed to reconsult and then make a new decision on whether to continue funding of homeopathy services.


Salima Budhani of law firm Bindmans, which acted for the Society, said: "This case underlines the necessity of transparent and accountable decision making by the controllers of health budgets, particularly in the light of the current financial climate in the NHS.

"CCGs have legal obligations to properly consider relevant evidence, as well as the views of experts and residents, in deciding how precious NHS resources are to be spent. It is essential that commissioning decisions are rational and evidence-based. Liverpool CCG's decision to reconsider its position on the funding of homeopathy in these circumstances is to be welcomed."

Budhani added: “Our client has also called upon the Secretary of State for Health to issue guidance on the funding of homeopathy on the NHS. Public statements by the Secretary of State indicate that he does not support ongoing funding, yet he has so far declined to ask NICE to do any work on this issue. The provision of such guidance would be of significant benefit to CCGs in justifying decisions to terminate funding."

According to the Society, a spokesperson for Liverpool CCG said: “Liverpool CCG currently resources a small homeopathy contract to the value of £30,000 per year that benefits a small number of patients in the city who choose to access NHS homeopathy care and treatment services.

“The CCG has agreed with the Good Thinking Society to carry out further engagement with patients and the general public to inform our future commissioning intentions for this service.”

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Jobs

Poll


 

Register for event alerts


Local Government Lawyer will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested updates. Please tick the box above to authorise us to send the alert requested.

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

 

On demand webinars

Leaving care provisions demystified!

Ann Osbourne and Alison Pryor discuss local authority duties under the Children Act 1989 and the Care Act 2014 – when the duties arise, what they encompass, human rights assessments, and the interface with the issues of immigration and homelessness.

Interveners in financial remedy proceedings

To continue our current family law webinar series, Andrew and Catrin discuss practical tips for intervener claims in financial remedy proceedings – how to identify them, case management, preparing documentation and costs considerations.

Standish 18 months on

Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.

Events

Events

Directory

Directory

Directory