Must read

The Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023
– the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
In the second of three articles for Local Government Lawyer on the Procurement
Act 2023 one year after it went live, Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from
DAC Beachcroft consider some of its practical impact and implications, including
how to choose the right regime, how authorities are tackling the notice requirements,
considerations when making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.
The Practical impact of the Procurement
Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits
and the legal lacunas
Katherine Calder and Victoria Fletcher from DAC Beachcroft
consider some of its practical impact and implications,
including how to choose the right regime, how authorities
are tackling the notice requirements, considerations when
making modifications, and setting and monitoring KPIs.


Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.
Weekly mandatory food
waste collections
What are the new rules on food waste collections and why are
councils set to miss the March deadline? Ashfords’ energy
and resource management team explain.


The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On -
How procurement processes are evolving
Katherine Calder and Sarah Foster of DAC Beachcroft focus on
changes to procurement design at selection and tender stage in
three key areas of change that the Act introduced.


Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.
Service charge recovery
and the Building Safety Act 2022
Zoe McGovern, Sian Gibbon and Caroline Frampton set out
what local authorities need to consider when it comes to
the Building Safety Act 2022 and service charge recovery.

Newsletter registration
Injunctions to restrain breaches of planning control
Who bears the burden?
Lawfulness and applications for a CLEUD
The OIA’s 2026 operating plan: What universities need to know
The Cardiff Airport subsidy control ruling
White Paper on SEN reforms: some lessons from the current Welsh SEN system
Greyhound racing and the separation of powers
CILEX and others v Mazur and others [2026] EWCA Civ 369
The Hillsborough Law Bill: implications for public bodies
Dispensing with notice to father
Court of Protection case update April 2026
The new PD27A: a step change in Family Court bundle and document management
Déjà Vu – the implications of Zenobē Energy’s latest case for local government
The ERA – Benefits and Working Conditions
£150m Clean Maritime Grant Competition Opens – Critical Subsidy Control Steps for Applicants
Failure by Employers to Keep Holiday Records Becomes a Criminal Offence From April 2026
Why I Wanted to Explore Intensity of Review Across the UK and New Zealand
Asylum hotels, overcrowding and the HMO rules
Practical impact of the Procurement Act 2023 – the challenges, the benefits and the legal lacunas
Intentional homelessness and tenancies obtained by false statement
Defective but not fatal
Self-grants of planning permission, functional separation and demolition avoidance
The lawfulness of emailing licensing decision notices
Intervention: the Monitoring Officer’s view
The role of the backbench councillor
FOI and information held on computer systems
Sentencing guidelines for HSE offences and public bodies
Correcting mistakes in public decision making
The Supreme Court on termination of JCT contracts
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Housing delivery stalling - role of local authorities
Renters’ Rights Act 2025 - what it means for local authorities
DOLS and Under 16s: Insights from Medway Council v A Father
The Local Power Plan: Putting Clean Power in Communities’ Hands
The powers of exclusion panels
Removal from kinship care
When school discipline meets disability
Navigating the expansion of foster care
Personal welfare deputies – Lawson and Mottram strikes back?
No "clinical decision" exemption from best interests
Local Government Reorganisation 2026
Adoption vs long-term fostering
Evolution of the academy trust and maintained school landscape
Care leavers and redaction of records
“Unusual facts and procedural irregularities”
Planning appeals and costs awards
Refusal of planning applications against officers’ advice
Land value and the principle of reality
The latest Sizewell C JR
Impecuniosity and other issues in credit hire claims
Anti-Money Laundering: Key Issues for Local Government Legal and Governance Teams
Arts and Culture, Community and Regeneration: The Two New Streamlined Subsidy Routes
Disclosure to the DBS
The CAT and the New Lottery Subsidy Control challenge
Gender-questioning children under draft KCSIE 2026
Accelerating the planning appeals process: unintended consequences
The convergence of DRS, Simpler Recycling and EPR
Reserve below-threshold contracts for UK or local suppliers under the 2026 Order
CMO Principle and Financial Assistance Further Clarified in Latest CAT Judgment on Subsidy Control
Make Europe Build Again – The EU Industrial Accelerator Act
Affordable housing funding news & unlocking S106 units
The Social and Affordable Housing Programme 2026–2036: new guidance
Housing case alert - February 2026
Residential developments: new section 106 delivery roadmap
The Renters Rights Act and social landlords
Assured tenancies: written statements and information sheets
The Procurement Act 2023: One Year On - How procurement processes are evolving
Book review: “Reforming lessons”
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
The draft NPPF consultation: what’s new
Mobile phones, AI and schools
Transparency in FII cases
Court documents and AI
Next steps for the LGPS after the access and fairness consultation
What is an Officer?
The High Court on the EHRC’s “interim update”
Substituted decision notices and contempt of court
Social media guidance for members
2026 in construction: a look ahead
Track allocation in housing disrepair claims
Withdrawing applications for care orders
Appropriate professional boundaries for teachers
Children under 16 and deprivation of liberty
A Welsh white leopard?
Conversion to an ‘empty’ MAT
Must read
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
Why AI must power the next wave of Social Housing delivery
Must read
Weekly mandatory food waste collections
Service charge recovery and the Building Safety Act 2022
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Integrated Care Board makes U-turn on autism assessment criteria changes after legal threat
- Details
Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board (ICB) has announced it will be reversing changes to its autism assessment criteria, after a letter before claim was sent by a parent-carer-led campaign group.
The campaign group, Access for Autism, launched a Crowd Justice campaign in March to fund legal action, after the new ICB agreed a policy in February which meant that children would only be assessed for autism and receive a formal diagnosis if their circumstances, health or family situation is in crisis.
Access for Autism said it had “deep concern” over the changes made by the ICB, which is the organisation responsible for the day-to-day running of the NHS in the area.
The campaign group reached their £5,000 fundraising target in order to engage specialist law firm Rook Irwin Sweeney.
In the letter before action, the following grounds of claim were submitted:
- Failure to consult
- Breach of Public Sector Equality Duty
- Failure to consider relevant information/failure to follow NICE Guidelines/NHS Operational Guidance
- Irrationality
- Unlawful failure to adhere to statutory duties under NHS Act 2006 and NHS Constitution
- Breach of Human Rights Act
In an update on 28 April, Access for Autism said on their Crowd Justice page that the ICB have now “reversed Sirona’s decision to change the assessment criteria for autism in Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire”, in what they described as “an incredible U-turn”.
They revealed that:
- the assessment criteria will revert to the status quo with immediate effect
- all young people on the waiting list will now be triaged in accordance with the old criteria
- all referrals made since 1 March will now be reconsidered with the old criteria in mind.
Sirona Care & Health and Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire ICB said: "We are grateful to all the parents, carers and local councillors who have shared their views regarding the recent changes to the local autism assessment referral criteria. We have always been committed to learning from young people and their families, and revising our approach if necessary, and we are sorry for any additional anxiety caused by the changes.
"Since the changes were introduced, we have also seen several further developments of direct relevance to our approach including publication of the National Framework for Autism Assessment Services and local agreement of £1m in funding to continue a waiting list initiative for autism assessments."
It added: "Considering these developments and the feedback received, we have agreed with our partners that we will revert to the previous assessment criteria, while continuing to triage all referrals based on clinical need and vulnerability as we have always done. We will now work closely with local parents, carers and partners to develop a sustainable approach to meeting the needs of children with neurodiversity.
"We will be contacting the parents and carers of children who have been referred since 1 March to notify them of the revised approach.”
Lottie Winson
Sponsored articles
How hair strand testing should be instructed for family court proceedings
How Finders International Supports Council Officers
Principal Lawyer - Community Services Team
Senior Lawyer - Community Services
Locums
Poll
25-06-2026 4:00 pm
24-09-2026 4:00 pm
On Demand











