Slide background
Slide background

Council refused permission to challenge Ombudsman findings on payment of special guardians

A High Court judge has refused to grant Rochdale Council permission to challenge the findings of a Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman on the way it pays special guardians.

In May 2019, the Ombudsman criticised the local authority for underpaying Special Guardianship Allowances to a family in the area.

The LGO said the High Court judge concluded that the council’s policy was at odds with statutory guidance and the principles established in previous court cases, and that no rational explanation had been put forward to justify this.

“The basic principle was that fostering allowances should be used as the starting point for these payments, with means-tested reductions and adjustments as appropriate,” the Ombudsman said.

The council was ordered to pay the Ombudsman’s costs. 

The case involved grandparents who had been granted a Special Guardianship Order to look after their grandchild.

The grandparents complained because their allowance did not increase in line with the fostering allowance rates nor were they given the age band increase for the child, which they had been told they would receive.

An investigation by the Ombudsman found the council’s policy on paying the allowance, which had not been agreed by any formal committee, was not in line with statutory guidance, caselaw, or its own internal legal advice, the LGO said.

In its subsequent report the LGO asked the council to:

  • calculate and backdate all Special Guardianship Allowance payments, for which the grandparents were eligible, to November 2013 (the publication date of the Ombudsman’s first focus report);
  • reconsider its policy for Special Guardianship Allowances in light of the statutory guidance, caselaw and the Ombudsman’s focus reports;
  • identify other Special Guardians similarly affected and make backdated payments to them too.

Michael King, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said: “The ability to scrutinise defective council policies goes to the heart of our work and it would have been a remarkable and regrettable erosion of our jurisdiction had this case been successful. The High Court has endorsed our decision and clearly rejected the council’s challenge

“Special guardianship orders offer invaluable stability to children who, for whatever reason, cannot live with their birth parents. We issued focus reports in 2013 and again in 2018 offering advice and guidance to councils on how they should support Special Guardians, after finding a number of families had not been treated fairly.

“Given the background to this case, we sincerely hope elected members will now honourably accept our recommendations to correct the council’s error and protect other families in the future.”

Gail Hopper, director of children’s services at Rochdale, said: "Our special guardians do such an important job looking after young people in difficult circumstances, keeping families together, and we appreciate all they do. We are very sorry for this payment error and the inconvenience this has caused.

"In line with the recommendations of the report, we will be reviewing the payments that any families who are in receipt of Special Guardianship payments receive and putting right any errors that have occurred by making appropriate compensatory payments. We will also be consulting in the New Year on a new policy around our SGO payments.”

Sponsored Editorial

  • Sheriffs Office Hi res

    High Court enforcement for Local Authorities

    High Court enforcement services can be useful for local authorities in several circumstances. The Sheriff's Office outlines the main circumstances when local authorities may need to use enforcement services and the procedures they will need to follow when they do.

Sheriffs Office TSO animated banner

Slide background